The theory of empty categories and the pro-drop parameter in Modern Greek

One of the most promising new developments of recent research into theoretical syntax within the model of Government and Binding (GB) as presented in Chomsky (1981) and (1982) has been the new importance given to the study of languages other than English. This has stimulated a great deal of work into a variety of languages (see, for example, Rizzi, 1982; Borer, 1983; Bouchard, 1984; Huang, 1984 and others). It has also been welcomed by linguists outside the TG tradition. Thus, Comrie, (1984:155) expresses his delight that ‘Chomsky (1981) makes clear that generative grammarians have come to realize that an adequate study of syntax within universal grammar requires the study of languages of different types. Chomsky's main concern has always been to formulate a theory that would achieve ‘explanatory adequacy’ by providing a restrictive set of principles which could characterize universally the notion ‘natural language’. However, detailed and in-depth analyses of various languages have revealed that in order to achieve ‘descriptive adequacy’ the theory has to allow for cross-linguistic differences, or ‘parametric variation’. The concept of parametric variation weakens some-what the restrictiveness of the universal grammar (UG) hypothesis and even more so its purported innateness, since the values for the parameters must be arrived at by the child through induction from empirical evidence. Nevertheless, explanatory adequacy may still be attained if the number of parameters is very small and each parameter has few values.

[1]  W. Harbert,et al.  On the Nature of the Matching Parameter , 1983, The Linguistic Review.

[2]  Richard S. Kayne Connectedness and binary branching , 1984 .

[3]  Geoffrey Horrocks,et al.  5. The order of constituents in modern Greek , 1983 .

[4]  Hagit Borer,et al.  Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages , 1984 .

[5]  C. Huang On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns , 1984 .

[6]  Richard S. Kayne,et al.  French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle , 1975 .

[7]  Geoffrey Horrocks,et al.  Bounding theory and Greek syntax: evidence for wh-movement in NP , 1987, Journal of Linguistics.

[8]  Irene P. Warburton,et al.  Modern Greek clitic pronouns and the ‘surface structure constraints’ hypothesis , 1977, Journal of Linguistics.

[9]  O. Jaeggli Topics in Romance syntax , 1982 .

[10]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Issues in Italian Syntax , 1981 .

[11]  Denis Bouchard,et al.  On the content of empty categories , 1982 .

[12]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[13]  Geoffrey Horrocks,et al.  The lexical head constraint, X-theory and the "pro-drop parameter" , 1984 .

[14]  G. Pullum,et al.  Order, Concord and Constituency , 1983 .

[15]  Bernard Comrie,et al.  Language universals and linguistic argumentation: a reply to Coopmans , 1984, Journal of Linguistics.

[16]  Knut Tarald Taraldsen,et al.  The internal structure and external distribution of tensed clausal complements in English, French and Norwegian , 1984 .

[17]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  On Wh-Movement , 1977 .

[18]  Noam Chomsky Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding , 1982 .