Predominant Leg Pain Is Associated With Better Surgical Outcomes in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Spinal Stenosis: Results From the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT)

Study Design. As-treated analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Objective. To compare baseline characteristics and surgical and nonoperative outcomes in degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and spinal stenosis (SpS) patients stratified by predominant pain location (i.e., leg vs. back). Summary of Background Data. Evidence suggests that DS and SpS patients with predominant leg pain may have better surgical outcomes than patients with predominant low back pain (LBP). Methods. The DS cohort included 591 patients (62% underwent surgery), and the SpS cohort included 615 patients (62% underwent surgery). Patients were classified as leg pain predominant, LBP predominant, or having equal pain according to baseline pain scores. Baseline characteristics were compared between the 3 predominant pain location groups within each diagnostic category, and changes in surgical and nonoperative outcome scores were compared for 2 years. Longitudinal regression models including baseline covariates were used to control for confounders. Results. Among DS patients at baseline, 34% had predominant leg pain, 26% had predominant LBP, and 40% had equal pain. Similarly, 32% of SpS patients had predominant leg pain, 26% had predominant LBP, and 42% had equal pain. DS and SpS patients with predominant leg pain had baseline scores indicative of less severe symptoms. Leg pain predominant DS and SpS patients treated surgically improved significantly more than LBP predominant patients on all primary outcome measures at 1 and 2 years. Surgical outcomes for the equal pain groups were intermediate to those of the predominant leg pain and LBP groups. The differences in nonoperative outcomes were less consistent. Conclusion. Predominant leg pain patients improved significantly more with surgery than predominant LBP patients. However, predominant LBP patients still improved significantly more with surgery than with nonoperative treatment.

[1]  A. Mannion,et al.  The Influence of Preoperative Back Pain on the Outcome of Lumbar Decompression Surgery , 2009, Spine.

[2]  E. Blood,et al.  SPORT SPINAL STENOSIS VERSUS DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS: COMPARISON OF BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS AND OUTCOMES , 2008 .

[3]  James N Weinstein,et al.  Reliability of Readings of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 2008, Spine.

[4]  Brett Hanscom,et al.  Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Brett Hanscom,et al.  Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  S. Savolainen,et al.  Preoperative Predictors for Postoperative Clinical Outcome in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Systematic Review , 2006, Spine.

[7]  S. Yerby,et al.  Patient-based outcomes for the operative treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[8]  D. Sengupta,et al.  Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Review of Current Trends and Controversies , 2005, Spine.

[9]  J. Ware,et al.  Applied Longitudinal Analysis , 2004 .

[10]  T. S. Keller,et al.  A predictive model for outcome after conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[11]  N. Birkmeyer,et al.  Design of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) , 2002, Spine.

[12]  R A Deyo,et al.  Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the maine lumbar spine study. , 2000, Spine.

[13]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. , 1999, Spine.

[14]  K. Tallroth,et al.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: assessment of long-term outcome 12 years after operative and conservative treatment. , 1998, Journal of spinal disorders.

[15]  R. Deyo,et al.  The Quebec Task Force Classification for Spinal Disorders and the Severity, Treatment, and Outcomes of Sciatica and Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 1996, Spine.

[16]  R. Deyo,et al.  The Maine Lumbar Spine Study, Part III: 1‐Year Outcomes of Surgical and Nonsurgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 1996, Spine.

[17]  M. Liang,et al.  The North American Spine Society Lumbar Spine Outcome Assessment Instrument: Reliability and Validity Tests , 1996, Spine.

[18]  D. Singer,et al.  Assessing Health‐Related Quality of Life in Patients With Sciatica , 1995, Spine.

[19]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[20]  R. Deyo,et al.  Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Attempted Meta‐Analysis of the Literature , 1992, Spine.

[21]  A. Nachemson.  Lumbar Spine Instability: A Critical Update and Symposium Summary , 1985, Spine.

[22]  Jo Jordan,et al.  Herniated lumbar disc. , 2005, Clinical evidence.

[23]  J. M. Strauss,et al.  Comparison of surgical procedures for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1975 to 1995 , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[24]  J. Laredo,et al.  Radiologic assessment of lumbar intervertebral instability and degenerative spondylolisthesis. , 2001, Radiologic clinics of North America.