Gain- and Loss-of-Function Mutations in the Breast Cancer Gene GATA3 Result in Differential Drug Sensitivity

Patterns of somatic mutations in cancer genes provide information about their functional role in tumourigenesis, and thus indicate their potential for therapeutic exploitation. Yet, the classical distinction between oncogene and tumour suppressor may not always apply. For instance, TP53 has been simultaneously associated with tumour suppressing and promoting activities. Here, we uncover a similar phenomenon for GATA3, a frequently mutated, yet poorly understood, breast cancer gene. We identify two functional classes of frameshift mutations that are associated with distinct expression profiles in tumours, differential disease-free patient survival and gain- and loss-of-function activities in a cell line model. Furthermore, we find an estrogen receptor-independent synthetic lethal interaction between a GATA3 frameshift mutant with an extended C-terminus and the histone methyltransferases G9A and GLP, indicating perturbed epigenetic regulation. Our findings reveal important insights into mutant GATA3 function and breast cancer, provide the first potential therapeutic strategy and suggest that dual tumour suppressive and oncogenic activities are more widespread than previously appreciated.

[1]  J. Foekens,et al.  GATA3 mRNA expression, but not mutation, associates with longer progression-free survival in ER-positive breast cancer patients treated with first-line tamoxifen for recurrent disease. , 2016, Cancer letters.

[2]  Ken Chen,et al.  Hotspot mutations delineating diverse mutational signatures and biological utilities across cancer types , 2016, BMC Genomics.

[3]  Minghua Deng,et al.  A microscopic landscape of the invasive breast cancer genome , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[4]  N. Rosenfeld,et al.  The somatic mutation profiles of 2,433 breast cancers refines their genomic and transcriptomic landscapes , 2016, Nature Communications.

[5]  David C. Jones,et al.  Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole genome sequences , 2016, Nature.

[6]  Michael L. Gatza,et al.  Proteogenomics connects somatic mutations to signaling in breast cancer , 2016, Nature.

[7]  A. Cimino-Mathews,et al.  The role of GATA3 in breast carcinomas: a review. , 2016, Human pathology.

[8]  S. Nijman,et al.  Functional genomics to uncover drug mechanism of action. , 2015, Nature chemical biology.

[9]  Zitong Zhao,et al.  The Significance and Therapeutic Potential of GATA3 Expression and Mutation in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review , 2015, Medicinal research reviews.

[10]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive Molecular Portraits of Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer , 2015, Cell.

[11]  F. Gannon,et al.  Functional Role of G9a Histone Methyltransferase in Cancer , 2015, Front. Immunol..

[12]  Cheryl H. Arrowsmith,et al.  Prevalent p53 mutants co-opt chromatin pathways to drive cancer growth , 2015, Nature.

[13]  Yan Wang,et al.  Dysfunction of the Reciprocal Feedback Loop between GATA3- and ZEB2-Nucleated Repression Programs Contributes to Breast Cancer Metastasis. , 2015, Cancer cell.

[14]  S. Efroni,et al.  Shift in GATA3 functions, and GATA3 mutations, control progression and clinical presentation in breast cancer , 2014, Breast Cancer Research.

[15]  Mingming Jia,et al.  COSMIC: exploring the world's knowledge of somatic mutations in human cancer , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  J. D. Di Santo,et al.  GATA-3 function in innate and adaptive immunity. , 2014, Immunity.

[17]  X. Li,et al.  GATA3 cooperates with PARP1 to regulate CCND1 transcription through modulating histone H1 incorporation , 2014, Oncogene.

[18]  G. Mills,et al.  Unraveling the regulatory connections between two controllers of breast cancer cell fate , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  Keda Yu,et al.  GATA3 mutations define a unique subtype of luminal‐like breast cancer with improved survival , 2014, Cancer.

[20]  Sara A. Grimm,et al.  Breast tumor specific mutation in GATA3 affects physiological mechanisms regulating transcription factor turnover , 2014, BMC Cancer.

[21]  Karen H. Vousden,et al.  Mutant p53 in Cancer: New Functions and Therapeutic Opportunities , 2014, Cancer cell.

[22]  E. Toska,et al.  Classification of a frameshift/extended and a stop mutation in WT1 as gain-of-function mutations that activate cell cycle genes and promote Wilms tumour cell proliferation , 2014, Human molecular genetics.

[23]  Barbara Mair,et al.  Exploiting epigenetic vulnerabilities for cancer therapeutics. , 2014, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[24]  S. Knapp,et al.  The structural basis of PI3K cancer mutations: from mechanism to therapy. , 2014, Cancer research.

[25]  G. Superti-Furga,et al.  Somatic mutations of calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types , 2013, Nature.

[27]  P. Pandolfi,et al.  Gata3 antagonizes cancer progression in Pten-deficient prostates. , 2013, Human molecular genetics.

[28]  Wei Shi,et al.  featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features , 2013, Bioinform..

[29]  Jeffrey E. Green,et al.  Expression of GATA3 in MDA-MB-231 Triple-negative Breast Cancer Cells Induces a Growth Inhibitory Response to TGFß , 2013, PloS one.

[30]  Benjamin E. Gross,et al.  Integrative Analysis of Complex Cancer Genomics and Clinical Profiles Using the cBioPortal , 2013, Science Signaling.

[31]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Cancer Genome Landscapes , 2013, Science.

[32]  E. Lander,et al.  Lessons from the Cancer Genome , 2013, Cell.

[33]  I. Grigorieva,et al.  GATA3 Mutations Found in Breast Cancers May Be Associated with Aberrant Nuclear Localization, Reduced Transactivation and Cell Invasiveness , 2013, Hormones and Cancer.

[34]  Z. Werb,et al.  GATA3 suppresses metastasis and modulates the tumour microenvironment by regulating microRNA-29b expression , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[35]  V. Theodorou,et al.  GATA3 acts upstream of FOXA1 in mediating ESR1 binding by shaping enhancer accessibility , 2013, Genome research.

[36]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic analysis of somatic mutations in phosphorylation signaling predicts novel cancer drivers , 2013 .

[37]  Marcus D. Hanwell,et al.  Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform , 2012, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[38]  F. Berry,et al.  BRCA1 and GATA3 corepress FOXC1 to inhibit the pathogenesis of basal-like breast cancers , 2012, Oncogene.

[39]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumors , 2012, Nature.

[40]  Adam A. Margolin,et al.  22 The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia - Using Preclinical Models to Predict Anticancer Drug Sensitivity , 2012 .

[41]  A. Sivachenko,et al.  Sequence analysis of mutations and translocations across breast cancer subtypes , 2012, Nature.

[42]  Thomas A. Peterson,et al.  Domain landscapes of somatic mutations in cancer , 2012, BMC Genomics.

[43]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  The landscape of cancer genes and mutational processes in breast cancer , 2012, Nature.

[44]  Benjamin E. Gross,et al.  The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[45]  F. Markowetz,et al.  The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups , 2012, Nature.

[46]  Joshua F. McMichael,et al.  Whole Genome Analysis Informs Breast Cancer Response to Aromatase Inhibition , 2012, Nature.

[47]  Adam A. Margolin,et al.  The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modeling of anticancer drug sensitivity , 2012, Nature.

[48]  C. Sander,et al.  Mutual exclusivity analysis identifies oncogenic network modules. , 2012, Genome research.

[49]  Wei Shi,et al.  Gata-3 Negatively Regulates the Tumor-Initiating Capacity of Mammary Luminal Progenitor Cells and Targets the Putative Tumor Suppressor Caspase-14 , 2011, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[50]  Wing-Kin Sung,et al.  Cellular reprogramming by the conjoint action of ERα, FOXA1, and GATA3 to a ligand-inducible growth state , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[51]  Peter A. DiMaggio,et al.  A chemical probe selectively inhibits G9a and GLP methyltransferase activity in cells. , 2011, Nature chemical biology.

[52]  Y. Shinkai,et al.  H3K9 methyltransferase G9a and the related molecule GLP. , 2011, Genes & development.

[53]  M. Stratton Exploring the Genomes of Cancer Cells: Progress and Promise , 2011, Science.

[54]  E. Lander Initial impact of the sequencing of the human genome , 2011, Nature.

[55]  G. Blobel,et al.  GATA Transcription Factors and Cancer. , 2010, Genes & cancer.

[56]  Wei Yan,et al.  GATA3 Inhibits Breast Cancer Metastasis through the Reversal of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[57]  Z. Werb,et al.  GATA3 in development and cancer differentiation: Cells GATA have it! , 2010, Journal of cellular physiology.

[58]  Mark D. Robinson,et al.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data , 2009, Bioinform..

[59]  Varda Rotter,et al.  When mutants gain new powers: news from the mutant p53 field , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[60]  Brian J. Wilson,et al.  GATA3 inhibits breast cancer growth and pulmonary breast cancer metastasis , 2009, Oncogene.

[61]  A. Nobel,et al.  Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[62]  J. Snyder,et al.  Structural basis for G9a-like protein lysine methyltransferase inhibition by BIX-01294 , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[63]  W. Alkema,et al.  BioVenn – a web application for the comparison and visualization of biological lists using area-proportional Venn diagrams , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[64]  D. Bates,et al.  Crystal structures of multiple GATA zinc fingers bound to DNA reveal new insights into DNA recognition and self-association by GATA. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[65]  Z. Werb,et al.  GATA-3 and the regulation of the mammary luminal cell fate. , 2008, Current opinion in cell biology.

[66]  Z. Werb,et al.  GATA-3 links tumor differentiation and dissemination in a luminal breast cancer model. , 2008, Cancer cell.

[67]  Jérôme Eeckhoute,et al.  Positive Cross-Regulatory Loop Ties GATA-3 to Estrogen Receptor α Expression in Breast Cancer , 2007 .

[68]  M. Olivier,et al.  Impact of mutant p53 functional properties on TP53 mutation patterns and tumor phenotype: lessons from recent developments in the IARC TP53 database , 2007, Human mutation.

[69]  E. Birney,et al.  Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes , 2007, Nature.

[70]  E. S. Venkatraman,et al.  A faster circular binary segmentation algorithm for the analysis of array CGH data , 2007, Bioinform..

[71]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  Reversal of H3K9me2 by a small-molecule inhibitor for the G9a histone methyltransferase. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[72]  Marie-Liesse Asselin-Labat,et al.  Gata-3 is an essential regulator of mammary-gland morphogenesis and luminal-cell differentiation , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[73]  Z. Werb,et al.  Candidate regulators of mammary branching morphogenesis identified by genome‐wide transcript analysis , 2006, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[74]  Zena Werb,et al.  GATA-3 Maintains the Differentiation of the Luminal Cell Fate in the Mammary Gland , 2006, Cell.

[75]  Jérôme Eeckhoute,et al.  A cell-type-specific transcriptional network required for estrogen regulation of cyclin D1 and cell cycle progression in breast cancer. , 2006, Genes & development.

[76]  Debashis Ghosh,et al.  Identification of GATA3 as a breast cancer prognostic marker by global gene expression meta-analysis. , 2005, Cancer research.

[77]  M. Cronin,et al.  A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[78]  R. Strausberg,et al.  Mutation of GATA3 in human breast tumors , 2004, Oncogene.

[79]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[80]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer , 2002, Nature.

[81]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[82]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[83]  R. Weigel,et al.  GATA‐3 is expressed in association with estrogen receptor in breast cancer , 1999, International journal of cancer.

[84]  James Douglas Engel,et al.  Targeted disruption of the GATA3 gene causes severe abnormalities in the nervous system and in fetal liver haematopoiesis , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[85]  P. Romeo,et al.  Human GATA-3 trans-activation, DNA-binding, and nuclear localization activities are organized into distinct structural domains , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[86]  J. D. Engel,et al.  DNA-binding specificities of the GATA transcription factor family , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[87]  Sara A. Grimm,et al.  GATA3 in Breast Cancer: Tumor Suppressor or Oncogene? , 2015, Gene expression.

[88]  Steven A. Roberts,et al.  Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes , 2013 .

[89]  Thomas R. Gingeras,et al.  STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner , 2013, Bioinform..

[90]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2013 .

[91]  J. Eeckhoute,et al.  Positive cross-regulatory loop ties GATA-3 to estrogen receptor alpha expression in breast cancer. , 2007, Cancer research.