Toward a Formal Model for Group Polarization in Social Networks

In this paper we develop a preliminary model for social networks, and a measure of the level of polarization in these social networks, based on Esteban and Ray’s classic measure of polarization for economic situations. Our model includes information about each agent’s quantitative strength of belief in a proposition of interest and a representation of the strength of each agent’s influence on every other agent. We consider how the model changes over time as agents interact and communicate, and include several different options for belief update, including rational belief update and update taking into account irrational responses such as confirmation bias and the backfire effect. Under various scenarios, we consider the evolution of polarization over time, and the implications of these results for real world social networks.

[1]  Barteld P. Kooi,et al.  Probabilistic Dynamic Epistemic Logic , 2003, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[2]  Claire Cardie,et al.  A Measure of Polarization on Social Media Networks Based on Community Boundaries , 2013, ICWSM.

[3]  Frank D. Valencia,et al.  Spatial and Epistemic Modalities in Constraint-Based Process Calculi , 2012, CONCUR.

[4]  Debraj Ray,et al.  On the Measurement of Polarization , 1994 .

[5]  Alexey S. Matveev,et al.  Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks With Hostile Camps: Consensus vs. Polarization , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[6]  Ananthram Swami,et al.  Consensus, Polarization and Clustering of Opinions in Social Networks , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[7]  Jae Kook Lee,et al.  Social Media, Network Heterogeneity, and Opinion Polarization , 2014 .

[8]  Dino Pedreschi,et al.  Algorithmic bias amplifies opinion fragmentation and polarization: A bounded confidence model , 2018, PloS one.

[9]  James A. Scepansky,et al.  Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information. , 1998 .

[10]  Peter H. Ditto,et al.  Motivated Skepticism: Use of Differential Decision Criteria for Preferred and Nonpreferred Conclusions , 1992 .

[11]  Camilo Rueda,et al.  Characterizing right inverses for spatial constraint systems with applications to modal logic , 2018, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[12]  Ethan Porter,et al.  The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes’ Steadfast Factual Adherence , 2019 .

[13]  Michael R. Hulsizer,et al.  Molding the Past: Biased Assimilation of Historical Information1 , 2004 .

[14]  W. Hoek,et al.  Dynamic Epistemic Logic , 2007 .

[15]  Audun Jøsang,et al.  Subjective Logic: A Formalism for Reasoning Under Uncertainty , 2016 .

[16]  Jan A. Plaza,et al.  Logics of public communications , 2007, Synthese.

[17]  François Schwarzentruber,et al.  Asynchronous Announcements in a Public Channel , 2015, ICTAC.

[18]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities , 2008, KDD.

[19]  R. Nielsen,et al.  Are News Audiences Increasingly Fragmented? A Cross-National Comparative Analysis of Cross-Platform News Audience Fragmentation and Duplication , 2017 .

[20]  Fenrong Liu,et al.  Logical dynamics of belief change in the community , 2014, Synthese.

[21]  Aaron Hunter.  Reasoning About Trust and Belief Change on a Social Network: A Formal Approach , 2017, ISPEC.

[22]  Camilo Rueda,et al.  Deriving Inverse Operators for Modal Logic , 2016, ICTAC.

[23]  Taylor W. Brown,et al.  Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Fenrong Liu,et al.  Logic in the Community , 2011, ICLA.

[25]  Camilo Rueda,et al.  Belief, knowledge, lies and other utterances in an algebra for space and extrusion , 2017, J. Log. Algebraic Methods Program..

[26]  Floriana Gargiulo,et al.  The Role of Homophily in the Emergence of Opinion Controversies , 2016, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[27]  Santiago Quintero,et al.  Reasoning About Distributed Knowledge of Groups with Infinitely Many Agents , 2019, CONCUR.

[28]  B. Nyhan,et al.  When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions , 2010 .

[29]  R. Kelly Garrett,et al.  The “Echo Chamber” Distraction: Disinformation Campaigns are the Problem, Not Audience Fragmentation , 2017 .

[30]  Engin Bozdag,et al.  Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization , 2013, Ethics and Information Technology.

[31]  Camilo Rueda,et al.  An algebraic view of space/belief and extrusion/utterance for concurrency/epistemic logic , 2015, PPDP.

[32]  François Schwarzentruber,et al.  Reasoning about knowledge and messages in asynchronous multi-agent systems , 2017, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[33]  Justin M. Rao,et al.  Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption , 2016 .

[34]  Z. L. Christoff,et al.  Dynamic logics of networks: Information flow and the spread of opinion , 2016 .

[35]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Signed networks in social media , 2010, CHI.