Detecting coordinated regulation of multi-protein complexes using logic analysis of gene expression

BackgroundMany of the functional units in cells are multi-protein complexes such as RNA polymerase, the ribosome, and the proteasome. For such units to work together, one might expect a high level of regulation to enable co-appearance or repression of sets of complexes at the required time. However, this type of coordinated regulation between whole complexes is difficult to detect by existing methods for analyzing mRNA co-expression. We propose a new methodology that is able to detect such higher order relationships.ResultsWe detect coordinated regulation of multiple protein complexes using logic analysis of gene expression data. Specifically, we identify gene triplets composed of genes whose expression profiles are found to be related by various types of logic functions. In order to focus on complexes, we associate the members of a gene triplet with the distinct protein complexes to which they belong. In this way, we identify complexes related by specific kinds of regulatory relationships. For example, we may find that the transcription of complex C is increased only if the transcription of both complex A AND complex B is repressed. We identify hundreds of examples of coordinated regulation among complexes under various stress conditions. Many of these examples involve the ribosome. Some of our examples have been previously identified in the literature, while others are novel. One notable example is the relationship between the transcription of the ribosome, RNA polymerase and mannosyltransferase II, which is involved in N-linked glycan processing in the Golgi.ConclusionsThe analysis proposed here focuses on relationships among triplets of genes that are not evident when genes are examined in a pairwise fashion as in typical clustering methods. By grouping gene triplets, we are able to decipher coordinated regulation among sets of three complexes. Moreover, using all triplets that involve coordinated regulation with the ribosome, we derive a large network involving this essential cellular complex. In this network we find that all multi-protein complexes that belong to the same functional class are regulated in the same direction as a group (either induced or repressed).

[1]  Ting Wang,et al.  An improved map of conserved regulatory sites for Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[2]  D. Pe’er,et al.  Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[3]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Nature.

[4]  Sarah A Teichmann,et al.  Conservation of gene co-regulation in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. , 2002, Trends in biotechnology.

[5]  M. Hall,et al.  TOR Signaling in Growth and Metabolism , 2006, Cell.

[6]  P. Bork,et al.  Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery , 2006, Nature.

[7]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Use of Logic Relationships to Decipher Protein Network Organization , 2004, Science.

[8]  A. Hinnebusch,et al.  New modes of translational control in development, behavior, and disease. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[9]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Inferring Cellular Networks Using Probabilistic Graphical Models , 2004, Science.

[10]  D. Klionsky,et al.  The Molecular Mechanism of Autophagy , 2003, Molecular medicine.

[11]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Revealing targeted therapy for human cancer by gene module maps. , 2008, Cancer research.

[12]  S. Baserga,et al.  Crosstalk in gene expression: coupling and co-regulation of rDNA transcription, pre-ribosome assembly and pre-rRNA processing. , 2005, Current opinion in cell biology.

[13]  Julian N. Selley,et al.  Global Translational Responses to Oxidative Stress Impact upon Multiple Levels of Protein Synthesis* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  Sander Granneman,et al.  Ribosome biogenesis: of knobs and RNA processing. , 2004, Experimental cell research.

[15]  Roded Sharan,et al.  Revealing modularity and organization in the yeast molecular network by integrated analysis of highly heterogeneous genomewide data. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  J. Rayner,et al.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Protein Mnn10p/Bed1p Is a Subunit of a Golgi Mannosyltransferase Complex* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  P. Bork,et al.  Dynamic Complex Formation During the Yeast Cell Cycle , 2005, Science.

[18]  Hans-Werner Mewes,et al.  MPact: the MIPS protein interaction resource on yeast , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  S. Munro,et al.  The Components of the Saccharomyces cerevisiaeMannosyltransferase Complex M-Pol I Have Distinct Functions in Mannan Synthesis* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  Naama Barkai,et al.  Strategy of Transcription Regulation in the Budding Yeast , 2007, PloS one.

[21]  J. Gallagher,et al.  Components of an Interdependent Unit within the SSU Processome Regulate and Mediate Its Activity , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[22]  Y. Zhang,et al.  IntAct—open source resource for molecular interaction data , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  Yaniv Ziv,et al.  Revealing modular organization in the yeast transcriptional network , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[24]  D. Klionsky,et al.  Autophagy in the Eukaryotic Cell , 2002, Eukaryotic Cell.

[25]  Nicola J. Rinaldi,et al.  Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome , 2004, Nature.

[26]  George M Church,et al.  A network of transcriptionally coordinated functional modules in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2005, Genome research.

[27]  Martin Schmidt,et al.  Importance of cell wall mannoproteins for septum formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2005, Yeast.

[28]  M. Kozak The scanning model for translation: an update , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[29]  Didier Gonze,et al.  Modularity of the transcriptional response of protein complexes in yeast. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  D. Botstein,et al.  Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[31]  G. Church,et al.  Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[32]  A. Helenius,et al.  Roles of N-linked glycans in the endoplasmic reticulum. , 2004, Annual review of biochemistry.

[33]  G. Pavitt,et al.  eIF2B, a mediator of general and gene-specific translational control. , 2005, Biochemical Society transactions.

[34]  E. Sprinzak,et al.  Utilizing logical relationships in genomic data to decipher cellular processes , 2005, The FEBS journal.

[35]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Tom Misteli,et al.  Potential Roles for Ubiquitin and the Proteasome during Ribosome Biogenesis , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[37]  A. Gerber,et al.  Stress-Dependent Coordination of Transcriptome and Translatome in Yeast , 2009, PLoS biology.