Strategic manoeuvers in outsourcing arrangements

Purpose Adaptation is often seen as a key competitive advantage for outsourcing vendors. Outsourcing research has often assumed that vendor capabilities are static. However, as a result of uncertainties and/or changes in the client environment, vendors need to be able to adapt their outsourcing capabilities. The aim of our research is to compare two contrasting outsourcing approaches and illustrate how an adaptive approach may deliver better results for clients in the long term. Design/methodology/approach The paper uses a combination of literature and case study research. A retrospective case study approach was adopted, using interviews, observations and analysis of reports. Two case studies utilizing contrasting clients approaches were investigated and compared. In one of the case studies, the client reorganized activities first and then outsourced them, while in the other, the client did the reverse – outsourced first and then reorganized. Findings The findings indicate that reorganizing first and outsourcing afterwards contributes to a more controlled implementation, which results in a more defined and stable set of vendor outsourcing capabilities that contributed to short-term success. In contrast, outsourcing first and reorganizing later demonstrates a less controlled redesign of the client’s organizational structure, which requires a malleable set of outsourcing capabilities to accommodate future change. The latter strategic manoeuver results in an extended adaptation period, as some capabilities need to be developed over time. However, it may improve success over time as subsequent changes in the client environment can be catered for in a better way. Research limitations/implications Only two explorative case studies were performed, limiting confidence in the degree of generalization of the results. We plea for more research on the effect of context dependency as various contingencies may impact the adaptation of outsourcing capabilities; for example, the volatility of the client’s market or the stability of the technology concerned. Practical implications When a client applies a proactive manoeuver, reorganizing first and then applying outsourcing, the number of adaptive capabilities required of the outsourcing vendor is reduced, limiting the risk for the client in the short term. In the longer term, however, subsequent change requirements may be less well-accommodated. Originality/value Strategic manoeuvers within an outsourcing context have received limited attention in research. As far as we know, this is the first empirical research that investigates the benefits of vendors having adaptive capability.

[1]  Jongwoo Kim,et al.  Achieving dynamic capabilities with cloud computing: an empirical investigation , 2016, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[2]  William H. DeLone,et al.  IT resources, organizational capabilities, and value creation in public-sector organizations: a public-value management perspective , 2014, J. Inf. Technol..

[3]  Ilan Oshri,et al.  On the Attractiveness of the UK for Outsourcing Services , 2014, Global Sourcing Workshop.

[4]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Leveraging Digital Technologies: How Information Quality Leads to Localized Capabilities and Customer Service Performance , 2013, MIS Q..

[5]  Carmen Weigelt,et al.  Leveraging supplier capabilities: The role of locus of capability deployment , 2013 .

[6]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Preface: advanced outsourcing practice: rethinking ITO, BPO and cloud services , 2012 .

[7]  Peter Buxmann,et al.  Organizational design of IT supplier relationship management: a multiple case study of five client companies , 2012, J. Inf. Technol..

[8]  Rong Du,et al.  Internal and contextual factors, knowledge processes and performance: From the Chinese provider's perspective , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Advanced Outsourcing Practice , 2012 .

[10]  M. Miozzo,et al.  Capabilities of large services outsourcing firms: The "outsourcing plus staff transfer model" in EDS and IBM , 2011 .

[11]  James D. McKeen,et al.  Enabling Collaboration with IT , 2011, Communications of the Association for Information Systems.

[12]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  A review of the IT outsourcing empirical literature and future research directions , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[13]  Ruth C. King,et al.  Capability, Quality, and Performance of Offshore IS Vendors: A Theoretical Framework and Empirical Investigation , 2010, Decis. Sci..

[14]  Graham Pervan,et al.  Offshore BPO at large captive operations in India , 2009, Inf. Technol. People.

[15]  Erik Beulen,et al.  The contribution of a global service provider's Human Resources Information System (HRIS) to staff retention in emerging markets: Comparing issues and implications in six developing countries , 2009, Inf. Technol. People.

[16]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  The Practice of Outsourcing: From Information Systems to BPO and Offshoring , 2009 .

[17]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Social Ties in Globally Distributed Software Teams: Beyond Face-to-Face Meetings , 2007 .

[18]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Managing Flexibility in Outsourcing , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[19]  S. Winter,et al.  The Co-evolution of Capabilities and Transaction Costs: Explaining the Institutional Structure of Production , 2005 .

[20]  P. Weill,et al.  IT Governance , 2017 .

[21]  K. Möller,et al.  How Does Adaptability Drive Firm Innovativeness , 2004 .

[22]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  From the Vendor's Perspective: Exploring the Value Proposition in Information Technology Outsourcing 1, 2 , 2003 .

[23]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[24]  Shailesh S. Kulkarni,et al.  Agility in manufacturing systems: an exploratory modeling framework and simulation , 2001 .

[25]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Global Information Technology Outsourcing: In Search of Business Advantage , 2001 .

[27]  Mary Sumner,et al.  Risk factors in enterprise-wide/ERP projects , 2000, J. Inf. Technol..

[28]  J. Child Strategic Choice in the Analysis of Action, Structure, Organizations and Environment: Retrospect and Prospect , 1997 .

[29]  Gordon E. Greenley,et al.  Consequences of High and Low Adaptive Capability in UK Companies , 1995 .

[30]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[31]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Politics of Strategic Decision Making in High-Velocity Environments: Toward a Midrange Theory , 1988 .

[32]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[33]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms , 1983 .

[34]  B. Chakravarthy Adaptation: A Promising Metaphor for Strategic Management , 1982 .

[35]  N. Denzin The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .