Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with digraph and matrix approach, AHP and ANP

The equipment selection process is considered in the early stage of the design process since the equipment selection process decides the quality, cost, and reliability, which are important for customer satisfaction. Due to the availability of large numbers of equipment, the selection of suitable equipment for certain operation/product becomes much difficult. The selection process is not so easy a task because the equipment features are many and vary from one manufacturer to another, and the features are also being increased constantly. Since the quality, cost, and reliability of a product are decided by proper equipment selection, the equipment selection process becomes more and more important. This paper describes three multi-attributes decision-making methods, namely, digraph and matrix approach, analytical hierarchical process (AHP), and analytical network process (ANP). These methods provide selection indices for different alternatives considered. In this paper, the selection of milling machine is considered. The problem is solved by digraph and matrix approach, AHP, and ANP methods. The results obtained by the three methods are compared and analyzed. Finally, a milling machine is selected as the best one concerning manufacturing environment.

[1]  Metin Dagdeviren,et al.  Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE , 2008, J. Intell. Manuf..

[2]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[3]  Henry C. W. Lau,et al.  Integration of expert system with analytic hierarchy process for the design of material handling equipment selection system , 2001 .

[4]  Narsingh Deo,et al.  Graph Theory with Applications to Engineering and Computer Science , 1975, Networks.

[5]  C. Kahraman,et al.  Fuzzy multi-attribute equipment selection based on information axiom , 2005 .

[6]  M. Iphar,et al.  An application of fuzzy sets to the Diggability Index Rating Method for surface mine equipment selection , 2006 .

[7]  Mario T. Tabucanon,et al.  A multiple-criteria approach to machine selection for flexible manufacturing systems , 1994 .

[8]  Zone-Ching Lin,et al.  Evaluation of machine selection by the AHP method , 1996 .

[9]  Chulho Chung,et al.  The selection of tools and machines on web-based manufacturing environments , 2004 .

[10]  V. Balakrishnan,et al.  Graph Theory , 1997 .

[11]  Yang-Byung Park ICMESE: Intelligent consultant system for material handling equipment selection and evaluation , 1996 .

[12]  Sandeep Grover,et al.  Human resource performance index in TQM environment , 2005 .

[13]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  Design of a material handling equipment selection model using analytic hierarchy process , 2006 .

[14]  Bülent Çatay,et al.  Development of a machine tool selection system using AHP , 2007 .

[15]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[16]  Mustafa Yurdakul,et al.  AHP as a strategic decision-making tool to justify machine tool selection , 2004 .