Going concern prediction using data mining techniques

Going concern is a fundamental concept in accounting and auditing and the assessment of a firm's going concern status is not an easy task. Several going concern prediction models based on statistical methods to assist auditors have been suggested in the literature. This study explores and compares the usefulness of neural networks, decision trees and logistic regression in predicting a firm's going concern status. The sample data comprise financial ratios for 165 going concerns and 165 matched non‐going concerns. The classification results indicate the potential usefulness of data mining techniques in a going concern prediction context. Further, the decision tree going concern prediction model outperforms the logistic regression and neural network models. Data mining techniques such as neural networks and decision trees are powerful for analysing complex non‐linear and interaction relationships, and hence can supplement and complement traditional statistical methods in constructing going concern prediction models.

[1]  Paul Gray,et al.  Special Section: Data Mining , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  John Hudson.  An analysis of company liquidations , 1986 .

[3]  Bruce Curry,et al.  NEURAL NETWORKS AND BUSINESS FORECASTING: AN APPLICATION TO CROSS‐SECTIONAL AUDIT FEE DATA , 1998 .

[4]  Duarte Trigueiros,et al.  Neural networks and empirical research in accounting , 1996 .

[5]  R. Billings.  A Model of Crisis Perception: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. , 1980 .

[6]  Namsik Chang,et al.  Dynamics of Modeling in Data Mining: Interpretive Approach to Bankruptcy Prediction , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  John M. Bryson,et al.  A perspective on planning and crises in the public sector , 1981 .

[8]  Raymond McLeod,et al.  Expert, Linear Models, and Nonlinear Models of Expert Decision Making in Bankruptcy Prediction: A Lens Model Analysis , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  H. Koh.  Model Predictions and Auditor Assessments of Going Concern Status , 1991 .

[10]  Lucy Marshall,et al.  Finding needles in the haystack : Mining meets the Web , 1999 .

[11]  Hian Chye Koh,et al.  A neural network approach to the prediction of going concern status , 1999 .

[12]  Ian Witten,et al.  Data Mining , 2000 .

[13]  Larry N. Killough,et al.  The USE OF MULTIPLE DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS IN THE ASSESSMENT OF THE GOING-CONCERN STATUS OF AN AUDIT CLIENT , 1990 .

[14]  Bongsik Shin,et al.  Data Mining: New Arsenal for Strategic Decision Making , 1999, J. Database Manag..

[15]  Edward I. Altman,et al.  FINANCIAL RATIOS, DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS AND THE PREDICTION OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY , 1968 .

[16]  Michael J. A. Berry,et al.  Data mining techniques - for marketing, sales, and customer support , 1997, Wiley computer publishing.

[17]  Hian Chye Koh,et al.  THE SENSITIVITY OF OPTIMAL CUTOFF POINTS TO MISCLASSIFICATION COSTS OF TYPE I AND TYPE II ERRORS IN THE GOING‐CONCERN PREDICTION CONTEXT , 1992 .