Decision Aiding Question selection for multi-attribute decision-aiding

A decision-maker (DM), or a group of DMs, must select a most preferred alternative from a finite set of alternatives. Each alternative has a single consequence. There are multiple and conflicting attributes. All value scores are known precisely. However, all that is known about the vector of trade-off weights is that it is a member of a given set, the tradeoff weight set. A facilitator can ask questions and use the responses to update the trade-off weight set and hence the set of non-dominated alternatives, i.e., those alternatives that are candidates for being a most preferred alternative. The DM can terminate this process at any point. Termination typically occurs when the non-dominated set contains a sufficiently small number of alternatives. The facilitator’s role is to ask questions that efficiently lead the DM to a most preferred alternative. The objective of this research is to aid the facilitator in selecting the best question to ask next. We model the question-response process as a sequential decision-making problem under uncertainty and develop a dynamic programming-based approach that guarantees a finite, and hence potentially computable, representation of the expected optimal cost-to-go function. An example serves to illustrate the approach. 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  J. C. Bean,et al.  A Genetic Algorithm Heuristic for Finite Horizon Partially Observed Markov Decision Problems , 2003 .

[2]  Alfonso Mateos,et al.  The utility efficient set and its interactive reduction , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Antreas D. Athanassopoulos,et al.  Dominance and potential optimality in multiple criteria decision analysis with imprecise information , 1997 .

[4]  Edward L. Hannan,et al.  Obtaining Nondominated Priority Vectors for Multiple Objective Decisionmaking Problems with Different Combinations of Cardinal and Ordinal Information , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[5]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  A choice set-sensitive analysis of preference information acquisition about discrete resources , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[6]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Communication , 1950 .

[7]  Chelsea C. White,et al.  Optimal Diagnostic Questionnaires Which Allow Less than Truthful Responses , 1976, Inf. Control..

[8]  Martin L. Puterman,et al.  Markov Decision Processes: Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming , 1994 .

[9]  Chelsea C. White,et al.  A penalty function approach to alternative pairwise comparisons in ISMAUT , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[10]  Andrew P. Sage,et al.  A model of multiattribute decisionmaking and trade-off weight determination under uncertainty , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[11]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[12]  Martin Weber,et al.  Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multiattribute decision making , 1993 .

[13]  Martin Weber Decision Making with Incomplete Information , 1987 .

[14]  Daphne Koller,et al.  Making Rational Decisions Using Adaptive Utility Elicitation , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.

[15]  Kyung S. Park,et al.  Tools for interactive multiattribute decisionmaking with incompletely identified information , 1997 .