Variations in US Hospital Performance on Imaging-use Measures

Background:The Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting Program (HOQR) publicly reports measures of US hospitals’ use of 4 imaging studies that may be problematic if overused: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for low back, follow-up imaging after screening mammography, and abdominal and thoracic computed tomography (CT) with and without contrast. Objectives:To characterize performance on these measures, determine whether performance was consistent across measures, and identify hospital characteristics associated with highest-decile imaging use. Research Design:Cross-sectional analysis. Measurements:Correlation across measures was assessed using Spearman rank order tests. We linked 2008 HOQR data to the 2009 American Hospital Association Survey and used multivariable logistic regression to examine associations between hospital characteristics and the likelihood of highest-decile imaging use. Results:Imaging use varied widely. Imaging use was weakly correlated (&rgr;<0.10) across most measures. Compared with hospitals with moderate imaging volume (25th to 75th percentile), hospitals with low volume (<25th percentile) were more likely to report highest-decile imaging use on all measures [adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) range from 1.38 (1.05–1.80) for CT Abdomen to 4.22 (3.04–5.84) for MRI Back]. Rural hospitals were more likely to report highest-decile use on most measures [MRI: 1.42 (1.21–1.68), CT Abdomen: 1.46 (1.28–1.66), and CT Thorax: 1.32 (1.16–1.51)]. For-profit hospitals were more likely to report highest-decile use on mammography [1.47 (1.10–1.98)] and CT Thorax measures [1.71 (1.28–2.27)]. Conclusions:Wide variations in imaging use and extraordinarily high use at some hospitals may indicate that imaging overuse occurs at US hospitals. The effectiveness of the HOQR measures to decrease imaging overuse remains to be seen.

[1]  W. M. Barclay.  Surgery , 1894, Bristol medico-chirurgical journal.

[2]  D. Himmelstein,et al.  Costs of care and administration at for-profit and other hospitals in the United States. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  J. Elmore,et al.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  J. Skinner,et al.  The association between for-profit hospital ownership and increased Medicare spending. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Isher,et al.  THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN FOR-PROFIT HOSPITAL OWNERSHIP AND INCREASED MEDICARE SPENDING , 2000 .

[6]  Ethan A Halm,et al.  Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the Literature , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  Afschin Gandjour,et al.  Threshold Volumes Associated With Higher Survival in Health Care: A Systematic Review , 2003, Medical care.

[8]  N. Birkmeyer,et al.  Rates of Advanced Spinal Imaging and Spine Surgery , 2003, Spine.

[9]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  Michael J Schell,et al.  Evidence-based target recall rates for screening mammography. , 2007, Radiology.

[11]  Noel T Brewer,et al.  Systematic Review: The Long-Term Effects of False-Positive Mammograms , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  J. Elmore,et al.  Background Methods Results , 2009 .

[13]  R Holland,et al.  European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document. , 2008, Annals of Oncology.

[14]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  Rebecca S Lewis,et al.  Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[16]  R. Hendrick,et al.  Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies. , 2010, Radiology.

[17]  J. Herman.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria. , 2010, Current problems in cancer.

[18]  G. Moneta,et al.  Projected Cancer Risks From Computed Tomographic Scans Performed in the United States in 2007 , 2010 .

[19]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria for screening mammography. , 2010, Radiology.

[20]  Roger Chou,et al.  Diagnostic Imaging for Low Back Pain: Advice for High-Value Health Care From the American College of Physicians , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[21]  David C. Miller,et al.  Regional collaboration to improve radiographic staging practices among men with early stage prostate cancer. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[22]  Patient volume and quality of care for young children hospitalized with acute gastroenteritis. , 2011, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[23]  Connie M. Rhee,et al.  Association between iodinated contrast media exposure and incident hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. , 2012, Archives of internal medicine.

[24]  Consumer Protection,et al.  European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.