Biological invasions and the acoustic niche: the effect of bullfrog calls on the acoustic signals of white-banded tree frogs

Invasive species are known to affect native species in a variety of ways, but the effect of acoustic invaders has not been examined previously. We simulated an invasion of the acoustic niche by exposing calling native male white-banded tree frogs (Hypsiboas albomarginatus) to recorded invasive American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) calls. In response, tree frogs immediately shifted calls to significantly higher frequencies. In the post-stimulus period, they continued to use higher frequencies while also decreasing signal duration. Acoustic signals are the primary basis of mate selection in many anurans, suggesting that such changes could negatively affect the reproductive success of native species. The effects of bullfrog vocalizations on acoustic communities are expected to be especially severe due to their broad frequency band, which masks the calls of multiple species simultaneously.

[1]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  Invasive Species, Environmental Change and Management, and Health , 2010 .

[2]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Anthropogenic sounds differentially affect amphibian call rate , 2005 .

[3]  C. Both,et al.  Widespread Occurrence of the American Bullfrog, Lithobates catesbeianus (Shaw, 1802) (Anura: Ranidae), in Brazil , 2011 .

[4]  C. Haddad,et al.  Mate Choice And Reproductive Biology Of Hypsiboas Albomarginatus (Anura: Hylidae) In The Atlantic Forest, Southeastern Brazil , 2007 .

[5]  I. L. Kaefer,et al.  Reproductive biology of the invasive bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus in southern Brazil , 2007 .

[6]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Auditory masking of anuran advertisement calls by road traffic noise , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  When sounds collide: the effect of anthropogenic noise on a breeding assemblage of frogs in Belize, Central America , 2011 .

[8]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression , 2001 .

[9]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Exotic taxa less related to native species are more invasive. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  H. Brumm The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird , 2004 .

[11]  Paola Laiolo,et al.  The emerging significance of bioacoustics in animal species conservation , 2010 .

[12]  K. Parris,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Effects of Roads and Traffic on Wildlife Populations and Landscape Function Frogs Call at a Higher Pitch in Traffic Noise , 2009 .

[13]  J. Bosch,et al.  Are frog calls modulated by the environment? An analysis with anuran species from Bolivia , 2004 .

[14]  E. García‐Berthou,et al.  Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  The Vocal Repertoire of the Bullfrog (Rana Catesbeiana) , 1968 .

[16]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Finding a mate at a cocktail party: spatial release from masking improves acoustic mate recognition in grey treefrogs , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  C. Haddad,et al.  Social Interactions in Hypsiboas albomarginatus (Anura: Hylidae) and the Significance of Acoustic and Visual Signals , 2006 .

[18]  K. Wells,et al.  An experimental study of acoustic interference between two species of neotropical treefrogs , 1983, Animal Behaviour.