The Development and Scaling of the easyCBM CCSS Elementary Mathematics Measures: Grade K. Technical Report #1314.

The results of formative assessments are regularly used to inform important instructional decisions (e.g., targeted intervention) within a response to intervention (RTI) system of teaching and learning. The validity of such instructional decision-making depends, in part, on the alignment between formative measures and the academic content standards on which classroom instruction is based, as well as the technical adequacy of the measures used in RTI applications. In the following technical report, we describe the development and scaling of the easyCBM Common Core State Standards elementary school mathematics measures for use within an RTI framework. Within a given grade, math items from two distinct item pools were calibrated to a common horizontal scale using a 1-parameter Rasch analysis. The results of the scaling were then used to construct 13 alternate forms designed to be of comparable difficulty – 3 forms designated for seasonal benchmark screening and 10 designated for progress monitoring. Prior and subsequent grade-level math items were added to the benchmark test forms as a basis for constructing a common vertical scale in the future. Evidence of technical adequacy is reported in appendices by both test form and by the full bank of CCSS items piloted and

[1]  Martha Thurlow,et al.  Universal Design Applied to Large Scale Assessments (NCEO Synthesis Report) , 2002 .

[2]  Steven M. Downing,et al.  Selected-Response Item Formats in Test Development , 2006 .

[3]  P. Shawn Irvin,et al.  The Development and Scaling of the easyCBM CCSS Middle School Mathematics Measures. Technical Report #1207. , 2012 .

[4]  Stanley L. Deno,et al.  Developments in Curriculum-Based Measurement , 2003 .

[5]  T. Haladyna Developing and validating multiple-choice test items, 3rd ed. , 2004 .

[6]  R. Brennan,et al.  Test equating : methods and practices , 1995 .

[7]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Introduction to Response to Intervention: What, Why, and How Valid Is It?. , 2006 .

[8]  Julie Alonzo,et al.  The Alignment of easyCBM[R] Math Measures to Curriculum Standards. Technical Report #1002. , 2010 .

[9]  S. Downing Twelve Steps for Effective Test Development. , 2006 .

[10]  Joseph C. Witt,et al.  A Multi-Year Evaluation of the Effects of a Response to Intervention (RTI) Model on Identification of Children for Special Education. , 2007 .

[11]  B. Wright Reasonable mean-square fit values , 1994 .

[12]  Christine E. DeMars Item Response Theory , 2010 .

[13]  Julie Alonzo,et al.  The Development of K-8 Progress Monitoring Measures in Mathematics for Use with the 2% and General Education Populations: Grade 5. Technical Report # 09-01. , 2009 .

[14]  Gerald Tindal,et al.  Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Brief History of Nearly Everything from the 1970s to the Present , 2013 .

[15]  P. Shawn Irvin,et al.  The Alignment of the easyCBM Grades 3-5 Math Measures to the Common Core Standards. Technical Report #1229. , 2012 .