External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation at and Near Term

Objectives: To determine the safety of procedure external cephalic version (ECV), the success of procedure at different gestational ages and to calculate the reduction in caesarean rate secondary to successful procedure. Study Design: Retrospective, descriptive study. Place and Duration of Study: from August, 2002 to July, 2003. Patients and Methods: This was a single centered retrospective descriptive study. It was carried out at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Shaikh Zayed Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute and Hospital, Lahore from August 2002 to July 2003. Hundred cases were selected for study. Results: Most of the patients in this study were multiparous. Success rate of ECV in this study was 50%. Out of this successful group 88% persisted as cephalic and 12% experienced reversion of their fetuses to breech. Normal vaginal delivery rate was 80% in the successful ECV group. Remaining cases underwent emergency caesarean section either due to spontaneous reversion to breech or fetal distress of cephalic fetuses in labour. Unsuccessful ECV group constitute 50% of cases. Elective caesarean delivery rate was high i.e. 96% in this group. Only one had vaginal breech delivery. The remaining underwent emergency caesarean section for various indications including footling breech, delayed progress in first stage of labour or at patient's request. Multiparity was the factor associated with greater success. No relationship could be found of the birth weight of fetus with the success of procedure in this study. No complication was observed during and after ECV. Conclusion: All the pregnant women with uncomplicated breech presentation should be offered external cephalic version when they are approaching term. This will provide them an alternate management option without causing any harm to them and their fetuses. This will also help in reducing the number of caesarean sections for breech presentation.

[1]  B. Bassaw,et al.  Correlation of fetal outcome with mode of delivery for breech presentation , 2004, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[2]  Darren McKay,et al.  External cephalic version beginning at 34 weeks' gestation versus 37 weeks' gestation: a randomized multicenter trial. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  G. Visser,et al.  Term breech presentation in The Netherlands from 1995 to 1999: mortality and morbidity in relation to the mode of delivery of 33,824 infants , 2003, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[4]  I. Abdelmoneim,et al.  Changing patterns in the management and outcome of breech presentation over a 7-year period. Review from a referral hospital in Saudi Arabia , 2003, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[5]  T. Leung,et al.  Outcome of labour after successful external cephalic version at term complicated by isolated transient fetal bradycardia , 2000, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[6]  F. Nahid Outcome of singleton term breech cases in the pretext of mode of delivery. , 2000, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association.

[7]  I. Durand-zaleski,et al.  External cephalic version with epidural anaesthesia after failure of a first trial with beta‐mimetics , 2000, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[8]  Terence Teoh Outcome of External Cephalic Version: Our Experience , 1996, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[9]  M. Kornman,et al.  Preterm external cephalic version in an outpatient environment. , 1995, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  M. Hannah,et al.  Breech delivery at term: A critical review of the literature , 1993, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  J. Fortney,et al.  Efficacy of external cephalic version: A review , 1993, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  J. P. Vandorsten,et al.  Predicting success of external cephalic version. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  D. Roder,et al.  Breech Presentation in South Australia, 1987–1989 , 1993, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[14]  J. Greenspoon,et al.  Repeated external cephalic version at term. , 1992, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[15]  W. S. Giles,et al.  External cephalic version after previous cesarean section. , 1991, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  G. Hofmeyr,et al.  External cephalic version at term: how high are the stakes? , 1991, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[17]  G. Hofmeyr External Cephalic Version at Term with Tocolysis , 1988 .

[18]  T. Chimbira,et al.  Controlled trial of external cephalic version , 1985, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[19]  D. Harvey EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF BREECH PRESENTATION , 1973, Developmental medicine and child neurology.