Modelling heterogeneity in behavioral response to peak-avoidance policy utilizing naturalistic data of Beijing subway travelers

Abstract Studies of travelers’ response behavior to transportation demand management is receiving substantial attention among researchers and transport operators in recent years. While previous studies in this area have generally assumed that the sensitivity of travelers to different factors is homogeneous and relies on survey responses, which may be prone to self-reporting errors and/or subject to behavioral incongruence. Relying on naturalistic data, this paper aims to investigate the behavioral response to pre-peak discount pricing strategy in the context of the Beijing subway with a special focus on the heterogeneity among the travelers. Anonymous smart card data from 5946 travelers before and after the introduction of a peak avoidance policy in Beijing are used to construct a latent class choice model to capture the sensitivity to different factors and the associated taste heterogeneity of travelers. Given the passive nature of the data, the model can offer more realistic outputs. The results indicate that there is substantial heterogeneity in travelers’ responses to the peak avoidance policy, and that they can be probabilistically allocated to four latent classes. For all classes of travelers, the decision to shift their departure to off-peak is affected by the monetary saving, the required change in departure time and the frequency of travel, but in different magnitudes. In particular, only two classes of travelers (who exhibit lower standard-deviation in pre-intervention departure time) show significant sensitivity to price changes indicating that the discount policies are more likely to be effective for these groups. The rest of travelers are largely price insensitive – warranting the need for non-monetary incentives as opposed to fare discounts. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to innovatively apply the LCC framework to analyze travelers’ heterogeneous behavior using large-scale smart card data without socio-demographic information. The findings can provide guidance to the subway authority in devising differential peak avoidance policies targeted for different groups of users, which are likely to be more effective than the current ‘one size fits all’ approach.

[1]  S. Managi,et al.  How does commuting behavior change due to incentives? An empirical study of the Beijing Subway System , 2014, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[2]  Keli A. Braitman,et al.  Patterns of distracted driving behaviors among young adult drivers: Exploring relationships with personality variables , 2017 .

[3]  Ahmad Tavassoli,et al.  Application of smart card data in validating a large-scale multi-modal transit assignment model , 2017, Public Transport.

[4]  Satish V. Ukkusuri,et al.  Experimental Economics and choice in transportation: Incentives and context☆ , 2017 .

[5]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Latent lifestyle preferences and household location decisions , 2007, J. Geogr. Syst..

[6]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  Costs of Travel Time Uncertainty and Benefits of Travel Time Information: Conceptual Model and Numerical Examples , 2006 .

[7]  Dinesh Gopinath,et al.  Modeling heterogeneity in discrete choice proceses : application to travel demand , 1995 .

[8]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Extended Framework for Modeling Choice Behavior , 1999 .

[9]  Stephane Hess,et al.  Latent class structures: taste heterogeneity and beyond , 2014 .

[10]  Zhenliang Ma,et al.  Demand management of congested public transport systems: a conceptual framework and application using smart card data , 2019, Transportation.

[11]  M. Wardman,et al.  Twenty Years of Rail Crowding Valuation Studies: Evidence and Lessons from British Experience , 2011 .

[12]  Jeroen K. Vermunt,et al.  Factor Analysis with Categorical Indicators: A Comparison Between Traditional and Latent Class Approaches , 2005 .

[13]  Erik T. Verhoef,et al.  Train Commuters' Scheduling Preferences: Evidence from a Large-Scale Peak Avoidance Experiment , 2015 .

[14]  Maria Börjesson,et al.  On the income elasticity of the value of travel time , 2012 .

[15]  Le Minh Kieu,et al.  A modified Density-Based Scanning Algorithm with Noise for spatial travel pattern analysis from Smart Card AFC data , 2015 .

[16]  Kevin G Volpp,et al.  Lottery-based versus fixed incentives to increase clinicians' response to surveys. , 2011, Health services research.

[17]  Prashant Kumar,et al.  Identifying public preferences using multi-criteria decision making for assessing the shift of urban commuters from private to public transport: A case study of Delhi , 2014 .

[18]  Linda K. Nozick,et al.  Selection and Evaluation of Travel Demand Management Measures , 1997 .

[19]  Eleni I. Vlahogianni,et al.  Big data in transportation and traffic engineering , 2015 .

[20]  Yoshizo Hashimoto,et al.  A Comparison between Latent Class Model and Mixed Logit Model for Transport Mode Choice : Evidences from Two Datasets of Japan , 2006 .

[21]  Yunpeng Wang,et al.  Understanding commuting patterns using transit smart card data , 2017 .

[22]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Hybrid Choice Models: Progress and Challenges , 2002 .

[23]  Jinhua Zhao,et al.  Individual mobility prediction using transit smart card data , 2018 .

[24]  Huang Hai-jun Model of Subway Commuters' Departure Time Choice with In-Carriage Congestion and Arrival Early/Late Penalty , 2009 .

[25]  Huiyu Zhou,et al.  Understanding peak avoidance commuting by subway: an empirical study in Beijing , 2018 .

[26]  Eran Ben-Elia,et al.  Changing commuters' behavior using rewards: a study of rush-hour avoidance , 2011 .

[27]  Ahmad Tavassoli,et al.  Public transport trip purpose inference using smart card fare data , 2018 .

[28]  Karel Martens,et al.  Revealing group travel behavior patterns with public transit smart card data , 2018 .

[29]  John M. Rose,et al.  Crowding in public transport systems: Effects on users, operation and implications for the estimation of demand , 2013 .

[30]  Jiangping Zhou,et al.  Tracking job and housing dynamics with smartcard data , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Ahmad Tavassoli,et al.  Determining route-choice behaviour of public transport passengers using Bayesian statistical inference , 2016 .

[32]  J. Hunt,et al.  Valuing of attributes influencing the attractiveness of suburban train service in Mumbai city: A stated preference approach , 2012 .

[33]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Which Is the Biggest Carrot? Comparing Nontraditional Incentives for Demand Management , 2013 .

[34]  David A. Hensher,et al.  A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit , 2003 .

[35]  Mark Hickman,et al.  Trip purpose inference using automated fare collection data , 2014, Public Transp..

[36]  C G Bamford,et al.  The use of association analysis in market segmentation for public transport: a case study of bus passengers in West Yorkshire, UK , 1987 .

[37]  Yan Liu,et al.  Evaluating the effects of public transport fare policy change together with built and non-built environment features on ridership: The case in South East Queensland, Australia , 2019, Transport Policy.

[38]  Akshay Vij,et al.  Incorporating the influence of latent modal preferences on travel mode choice behavior , 2013 .

[39]  Haris N. Koutsopoulos,et al.  Reducing Subway Crowding: Analysis of an Off-Peak Discount Experiment in Hong Kong , 2016 .

[40]  Mahmoud Mesbah,et al.  Use of Smart Card Fare Data to Estimate Public Transport Origin–Destination Matrix , 2015 .

[41]  Jeremy Shires,et al.  Accommodating Underlying Pro-environmental Attitudes in a Rail Travel Context: Application of a Latent Variable Latent Class Specification , 2013 .

[42]  Peter White,et al.  The Potential of Public Transport Smart Card Data , 2005 .

[43]  Ryan Greene-Roesel,et al.  BART Perks: Using Incentives to Manage Transit Demand , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[44]  Alexander Erath,et al.  Transport modelling in the age of big data , 2017 .

[45]  D. Ettema,et al.  Rewarding rush-hour avoidance: A study of commuters' travel behavior. , 2011 .

[46]  Jiří Slavík,et al.  Estimation of a route choice model for urban public transport using smart card data , 2014 .

[47]  Nan Yang,et al.  Temporary Incentives Change Daily Routines: Evidence from a Field Experiment on Singapore's Subways , 2017, Manag. Sci..

[48]  Cui Chengyin,et al.  Identifying Commuting Pattern of Beijing Using Bus Smart Card Data , 2012 .

[49]  Charisma F. Choudhury,et al.  Emerging Big Data Sources for Public Transport Planning: A Systematic Review on Current State of Art and Future Research Directions , 2019, Journal of the Indian Institute of Science.