Groundwater flow patterns in a large peatland

Abstract Groundwater flow patterns and geochemistry were studied in the Mer Bleue bog, near Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Groundwater flow patterns alternated between recharge, i.e. head gradients producing flow from the surface of the peatland to the deeper peat, and discharge, i.e. head gradients indicating flow from the deeper peat towards the surface of the peatland, during the summer of 1998. The patterns were controlled by changes in precipitation, evapotranspiration and the differential head response of catotelm peat (lower layer) to changes in water table elevation. Above-average rainfall in the spring created recharge patterns of groundwater flow in the peatland. Evapotranspiration exceeded precipitation for a three-week period in mid-summer decreasing head at the water table and reversing flow from recharge to discharge. A sustained moisture deficit maintained a flow reversal for 32 days, until a 46 mm rainfall raised the water-table, reversing the vertical hydraulic gradients and restoring recharge flow. The mixing of meteoric water and deeper groundwater controls geochemical profiles. Diffusion modeling shows that the peatland is a long-term recharge system. However, electrical conductivity and cation concentrations in peat pore-waters increase (up to 60%) during a flow reversal, and then decrease when recharge conditions are re-established. The redistribution of substrates from reversed flow is likely important to peatland biogeochemical function.

[1]  D. Siegel,et al.  Climate-driven flushing of pore water in peatlands , 1995, Nature.

[2]  C. Neuzil Groundwater Flow in Low‐Permeability Environments , 1986 .

[3]  S. P. Mathur,et al.  EFFECT OF IN‐SITU GAS ACCUMULATION ON THE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF PEAT , 1992 .

[4]  E. Gorham Northern Peatlands: Role in the Carbon Cycle and Probable Responses to Climatic Warming. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[5]  T. C. Winter,et al.  Hydrologic setting of wetlands in the Cottonwood Lake area, Stutsman County, North Dakota , 1980 .

[6]  S. P. Mathur,et al.  An ombrotrophic bog as a methane reservoir , 1989 .

[7]  J. Chanton,et al.  Radiocarbon evidence for the substrates supporting methane formation within northern Minnesota peatlands , 1995 .

[8]  D. Siegel,et al.  Groundwater flow and the metal content of peat , 1991 .

[9]  T. Meyers,et al.  Measuring Biosphere‐Atmosphere Exchanges of Biologically Related Gases with Micrometeorological Methods , 1988 .

[10]  B. Branfireun,et al.  FLOW REVERSALS IN PEATLANDS INFLUENCED BY LOCAL GROUNDWATER SYSTEMS , 1997 .

[11]  Thomas C. Winter,et al.  Relation of streams, lakes, and wetlands to groundwater flow systems , 1999 .

[12]  R. Mott,et al.  Palynological studies in the Ottawa area , 1969 .

[13]  F. E. Egler Ecosystems of the World , 1960 .

[14]  P. K. Doss The nature of a dynamic water table in a system of non-tidal, freshwater coastal wetlands , 1993 .

[15]  D. Siegel,et al.  Hydraulic reversals and episodic methane emissions during drought cycles in mires , 1993 .

[16]  John Crank,et al.  The Mathematics Of Diffusion , 1956 .

[17]  A. Heyes,et al.  The hydrology and methylmercury dynamics of a Precambrian shield headwater peatland , 1996 .

[18]  D. I. Siegela The Recharge‐Discharge Function of Wetlands Near Juneau, Alaska: Part I. Hydrogeological Investigations , 1988 .

[19]  P. Glaser,et al.  The patterned mires of the Red Lake Peatland, northern Minnesota: vegetation, water chemistry, and landforms , 1981 .

[20]  Shashi B. Verma,et al.  Micrometeorological methods for measuring surface fluxes of mass and energy , 1990 .

[21]  D. Verseghy,et al.  Parametrization of peatland hydraulic properties for the Canadian land surface scheme , 2000, Data, Models and Analysis.

[22]  D. Siegel,et al.  HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY AND RELATED PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF PEAT, LOST RIVER PEATLAND, NORTHERN MINNESOTA , 1986 .

[23]  N. Roulet,et al.  Groundwater flow and dissolved carbon movement in a boreal peatland , 1997 .