What is the gap in activity and participation between people with disability and the general population in Taiwan?

[1]  J. Ponsford,et al.  Measurement of Disability-free Survival after Surgery , 2015, Anesthesiology.

[2]  H. Liao,et al.  Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 36--item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: validity and reliability analyses. , 2014, Research in developmental disabilities.

[3]  T. Liou,et al.  Validity and reliability of the Functioning Disability Evaluation Scale-Adult Version based on the WHODAS 2.0--36 items. , 2014, Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi.

[4]  T. Liou,et al.  Does the planned long-term care policy in Taiwan meet the needs of people with disabilities? , 2014, Health policy.

[5]  Yen-ho Wang,et al.  Evolution of system for disability assessment based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: A Taiwanese study. , 2013, Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi.

[6]  Yen-ho Wang,et al.  Implementing disability evaluation and welfare services based on the framework of the international classification of functioning, disability and health: experiences in Taiwan , 2013, BMC Health Services Research.

[7]  Y. Liu,et al.  Activity limitation and participation restrictions of breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: psychometric properties and validation of the Chinese version of the WHODAS 2.0 , 2013, Quality of Life Research.

[8]  R. Hays,et al.  US general population norms for telephone administration of the SF-36v2. , 2012, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  P. Nash,et al.  Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey Questionnaire: normative data for Wales. , 2011, Journal of public health.

[10]  J. Ayuso-Mateos,et al.  Validation of the "World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2" in patients with chronic diseases , 2010, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[11]  Jacques P. Brown,et al.  Health-related Quality of Life in Canadian Adolescents and Young Adults: Normative Data Using the SF-36 , 2009, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[12]  M. Wunderlich,et al.  WHODAS II with people after stroke and their relatives , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation.

[13]  A. Cieza,et al.  Psychometric properties of the WHODASII in rehabilitation patients , 2007, Quality of Life Research.

[14]  J. Richardson,et al.  Retrospective baseline measurement of self-reported health status and health-related quality of life versus population norms in the evaluation of post-injury losses , 2007, Injury Prevention.

[15]  N. Powe,et al.  Barriers to health care access among the elderly and who perceives them. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[16]  M. T. J. Buñuales,et al.  La clasificación internacional del funcionamiento de la discapacidad y de la salud (CIF) 2001 , 2002 .

[17]  S. Katz,et al.  STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION. , 1963, JAMA.

[18]  A. Williams,et al.  International classification of functioning, disability, and health: ICF-CY World Health Organization , 2013 .

[19]  T. B. Üstün,et al.  Measuring health and disability : manual for WHO Disability Assessment Schedule : WHODAS 2.0 , 2010 .

[20]  Joshua A. Salomon,et al.  WHO Multi-country Survey Study on Health and Responsiveness 2000-2001 , 2001 .