Thermodynamically consistent and positivity-preserving discretization of the thin-film equation with thermal noise

In micro-fluidics not only does capillarity dominate but also thermal fluctuations become important. On the level of the lubrication approximation, this leads to a quasi-linear fourth-order parabolic equation for the film height h driven by space-time white noise. The (formal) gradient flow structure of its deterministic counterpart, the so-called thin-film equation, which encodes the balance between driving capillary and limiting viscous forces, provides the guidance for the thermodynamically consistent introduction of fluctuations. We follow this route on the level of a spatial discretization of the gradient flow structure, i.e., on the level of a discretization of energy functional and dissipative metric tensor. Starting from an energetically conformal finite-element (FE) discretization, we point out that the numerical mobility function introduced by Grün and Rumpf can be interpreted as a discretization of the metric tensor in the sense of a mixed FE method with lumping. While this discretization was devised in order to preserve the so-called entropy estimate, we use this to show that the resulting high-dimensional stochastic differential equation (SDE) preserves pathwise and pointwise strict positivity, at least in case of the physically relevant mobility function arising from the no-slip boundary condition. As a consequence, and opposed to more naive discretizations of the thin-film equation with thermal noise, the above discretization is not in need of an artificial condition at the boundary of the configuration space orthant {h > 0} (which admittedly could also be avoided by modelling a disjoining pressure). As a consequence, this discretization gives rise to a consistent invariant measure, namely a discretization of the Brownian excursion (up to the volume constraint), and thus features an entropic repulsion. The price to pay over more naive discretizations is that when writing the SDE in Itô’s form, which is the basis for the Euler-Mayurama time discretization, a correction term appears. We perform various numerical experiments to compare the behavior and performance of our discretization to that of the more naive finite difference discretization of the equation. Among other things, we study numerically the invariance and entropic repulsion of the invariant measure and provide evidence for the fact that the finite difference discretization touches down almost surely while our discretization stays away from the ∂{h > 0}. (‡) Universität Bielefeld & Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften (†) Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften E-mail addresses: benjamin.gess@gmail.com, gvalani@mis.mpg.de, kunick@mis.mpg.de, otto@mis.mpg.de. Date: September 14, 2021. 2020 Mathematics Subject Classification. 60H17, 76D45, 65C99.

[1]  B. Gess,et al.  The stochastic thin-film equation: Existence of nonnegative martingale solutions , 2019, Stochastic Processes and their Applications.

[2]  G. Grün Degenerate Parabolic Differential Equations of Fourth Order and a Plasticity Model with Non-Local Hardening , 1995 .

[3]  J. Fischer OPTIMAL LOWER BOUNDS ON ASYMPTOTIC SUPPORT PROPAGATION RATES FOR THE THIN-FILM EQUATION , 2013 .

[4]  Felix Otto,et al.  Lubrication approximation with prescribed nonzero contact anggle , 1998 .

[5]  S. Shreve,et al.  Stochastic differential equations , 1955, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[6]  L. Zambotti A Reflected Stochastic Heat Equation as Symmetric Dynamics with Respect to the 3-d Bessel Bridge , 2001 .

[7]  Stefan Metzger,et al.  Existence of nonnegative solutions to stochastic thin-film equations in two space dimensions , 2021 .

[8]  F. Cornalba A priori positivity of solutions to a non-conservative stochastic thin-film equation , 2018, 1811.07826.

[9]  M. Bertsch,et al.  Nonnegative solutions of a fourth-order nonlinear degenerate parabolic equation , 1995 .

[10]  池田 信行,et al.  Stochastic differential equations and diffusion processes , 1981 .

[11]  Vladas Sidoravicius,et al.  Stochastic Processes and Applications , 2007 .

[12]  Martin Hairer,et al.  Large deviations for white-noise driven, nonlinear stochastic PDEs in two and three dimensions , 2014, 1404.5863.

[13]  Benjamin Gess,et al.  Non-negative Martingale Solutions to the Stochastic Thin-Film Equation with Nonlinear Gradient Noise , 2021, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis.

[14]  Martin Hairer,et al.  A Course on Rough Paths , 2020, Universitext.

[15]  C. Villani Topics in Optimal Transportation , 2003 .

[16]  Lorenzo Giacomelli,et al.  Rigorous lubrication approximation , 2003 .

[17]  K. Mecke,et al.  Thin-Film Flow Influenced by Thermal Noise , 2006 .

[18]  Yann Brenier,et al.  A computational fluid mechanics solution to the Monge-Kantorovich mass transfer problem , 2000, Numerische Mathematik.

[19]  Xiongzhi Chen Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus , 2008 .

[20]  M. Freidlin,et al.  Random Perturbations of Dynamical Systems , 1984 .

[21]  Entropic repulsion for massless fields , 2000 .

[22]  Harald Garcke,et al.  The thin viscous flow equation in higher space dimensions , 1998 .

[23]  Martin Rumpf,et al.  Nonnegativity preserving convergent schemes for the thin film equation , 2000, Numerische Mathematik.

[24]  Martin Hairer,et al.  A spatial version of the Itô–Stratonovich correction , 2010, 1011.0966.

[25]  L. Zambotti A conservative evolution of the Brownian excursion , 2007, 0711.1068.

[26]  Lorenzo Giacomelli,et al.  A waiting time phenomenon for thin film equations , 2001 .

[27]  B. Davidovitch,et al.  Spreading of viscous fluid drops on a solid substrate assisted by thermal fluctuations. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[28]  Francisco Bernis,et al.  Finite speed of propagation and continuity of the interface for thin viscous flows , 1996, Advances in Differential Equations.

[29]  Upper Bounds on Waiting Times for the Thin-Film Equation: The Case of Weak Slippage , 2014 .

[30]  M. Yor,et al.  Continuous martingales and Brownian motion , 1990 .

[31]  M. A. Peletier,et al.  On the Relation between Gradient Flows and the Large-Deviation Principle, with Applications to Markov Chains and Diffusion , 2013, 1312.7591.

[32]  Günther Grün,et al.  Existence of Positive Solutions to Stochastic Thin-Film Equations , 2018, SIAM J. Math. Anal..

[33]  Rishabh S. Gvalani,et al.  Instability, Rupture and Fluctuations in Thin Liquid Films: Theory and Computations , 2017, Journal of Statistical Physics.

[34]  Mary C. Pugh,et al.  The lubrication approximation for thin viscous films: Regularity and long-time behavior of weak solutions , 1996 .

[35]  N. Masmoudi,et al.  Darcy’s Flow with Prescribed Contact Angle: Well-Posedness and Lubrication Approximation , 2012, 1204.2278.

[36]  J. Gärtner,et al.  Large deviations from the mckean-vlasov limit for weakly interacting diffusions , 1987 .

[37]  Robert V. Kohn,et al.  Action minimization and sharp‐interface limits for the stochastic Allen‐Cahn equation , 2007 .

[38]  Andrea L. Bertozzi,et al.  Positivity-Preserving Numerical Schemes for Lubrication-Type Equations , 1999, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[39]  F. Otto THE GEOMETRY OF DISSIPATIVE EVOLUTION EQUATIONS: THE POROUS MEDIUM EQUATION , 2001 .

[40]  Harald Garcke,et al.  On A Fourth-Order Degenerate Parabolic Equation: Global Entropy Estimates, Existence, And Qualitativ , 1998 .

[41]  F. Otto,et al.  Quasilinear SPDEs via Rough Paths , 2016, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis.

[42]  A. Friedman,et al.  Higher order nonlinear degenerate parabolic equations , 1990 .

[43]  Max Sauerbrey Martingale solutions to the stochastic thin-film equation in two dimensions , 2021 .