The Auditory Comprehension of Wh-Questions in Aphasia: Support for the Intervener Hypothesis.

PURPOSE This study examines 3 hypotheses about the processing of wh-questions in both neurologically healthy adults and adults with Broca's aphasia. METHOD We used an eye tracking while listening method with 32 unimpaired participants (Experiment 1) and 8 participants with Broca's aphasia (Experiment 2). Accuracy, response time, and online gaze data were collected. RESULTS In Experiment 1, we established a baseline for how unimpaired processing and comprehension of 4 types of wh-question (subject- and object-extracted who- and which-questions) manifest. There was no unambiguous support found for any of the 3 hypotheses in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2 with the Broca's participants, however, we found significantly lower accuracy, slower response times, and increased interference in our gaze data in the object-extracted which-questions relative to the other conditions. CONCLUSIONS Our results provide support for the intervener hypothesis, which states that sentence constructions that contain an intervener (a lexical noun phrase) between a displaced noun phrase and its gap site result in a significant processing disadvantage relative to other constructions. We argue that this hypothesis offers a compelling explanation for the comprehension deficits seen in some participants with Broca's aphasia.

[1]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia , 1976, Brain and Language.

[2]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[3]  A. Friederici,et al.  Comprehension in aphasia: A cross-linguistic study , 1987, Brain and Language.

[4]  Y. Grodzinsky.  Theoretical perspectives on language deficits , 1990 .

[5]  M. de Vincenzi,et al.  Syntactic Parsing Strategies in Italian: The Minimal Chain Principle , 1991 .

[6]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[7]  D. Swinney,et al.  An On-Line Analysis of Syntactic Processing in Broca′s and Wernicke′s Aphasia , 1993, Brain and Language.

[8]  L. Frazier,et al.  Favor Referential Representations , 1995, Brain and Language.

[9]  Y. Grodzinsky.  A Restrictive Theory of Agrammatic Comprehension , 1995, Brain and Language.

[10]  G. Hickok,et al.  Comprehension of Wh-Questions in Two Broca's Aphasics , 1996, Brain and Language.

[11]  Paul D. Allopenna,et al.  Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models , 1998 .

[12]  Y. Grodzinsky,et al.  The Neurology of Empty Categories: Aphasics' Failure to Detect Ungrammaticality , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  K. Ballard,et al.  Agrammatic Aphasic Subjects' Comprehension of Subject and Object ExtractedWhQuestions , 1999, Brain and Language.

[14]  S. Avrutin.  Comprehension of Discourse-Linked and Non-Discourse-Linked Questions by Children and Broca's Aphasics , 2000 .

[15]  Y. Grodzinsky.  The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  Lewis P. Shapiro,et al.  Some Recent Investigations of Gap Filling in Normal Listeners: Implications for Normal and Disordered Language Processing , 2000 .

[17]  M. Piñango.  On the proper generalization for Broca's aphasia comprehension pattern: Why argument movement may not be at the source of the Broca's deficit , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Processing “d-Linked” Phrases , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[19]  Tracy Love,et al.  On the Categorization of Aphasic Typologies: The SOAP (A Test of Syntactic Complexity) , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[20]  E. Gordon,et al.  Defining the temporal threshold for ocular fixation in free-viewing visuocognitive tasks , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[21]  L. Shapiro,et al.  Agrammatic comprehension of simple active sentences with moved constituents: Hebrew OSV and OVS structures. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[22]  P. Gordon,et al.  Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity , 2004 .

[23]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Statistics in Psycholinguistics: A critique of some current gold standards , 2004 .

[24]  C. Salis,et al.  Discourse linking, canonicity, and comprehension of wh-questions in agrammatism , 2005, Brain and Language.

[25]  Sun-Young Lee,et al.  A Note on Canonical Word Order , 2005 .

[26]  Petra B. Schumacher,et al.  The Syntax–Discourse Interface: Representing and interpreting dependency , 2005 .

[27]  Antonino Grillo,et al.  Minimality effects in agrammatic comprehension , 2005 .

[28]  Wh-questions and the nature of D-linking : a processing perspective , 2006 .

[29]  P. Gordon,et al.  Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  Y. Grodzinsky,et al.  A new empirical angle on the variability debate: Quantitative neurosyntactic analyses of a large data set from Broca’s Aphasia , 2006, Brain and Language.

[31]  J. V. Van Dyke.  Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  Raquel González Rodríguez.  Reconstruction and scope in exclamative sentences , 2007 .

[33]  C. Thompson,et al.  Real-time comprehension of wh- movement in aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking while listening , 2007, Brain and Language.

[34]  L. Rizzi.  Relativized Minimality Effects , 2008 .

[35]  Sergey Avrutin,et al.  Slower-than-normal syntactic processing in agrammatic Broca's aphasia: Evidence from Dutch , 2008, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[36]  D. Swinney,et al.  How left inferior frontal cortex participates in syntactic processing: Evidence from aphasia , 2008, Brain and Language.

[37]  C. Thompson,et al.  Automatic processing of wh- and NP-movement in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking , 2009, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[38]  Nino Grillo.  Generalized Minimality: Feature impoverishment and comprehension deficits in agrammatism , 2009 .

[39]  A. Belletti,et al.  Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies , 2009 .

[40]  B. McElree,et al.  Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. , 2011 .

[41]  J. Rothman,et al.  The mind-context divide: on acquisition at the linguistic interfaces , 2011 .

[42]  Matthew Walenski,et al.  The time-course of lexical activation during sentence comprehension in people with aphasia. , 2012, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[43]  N. Friedmann,et al.  Intervention and Locality in agrammatic aphasia , 2012 .

[44]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[45]  H. Goodglass.  Boston diagnostic aphasia examination , 2013 .

[46]  L. Stowe,et al.  D-linking or set-restriction? Processing Which-questions in Dutch , 2013 .