The future of natural gas infrastructure development in the United states

Abstract Changes in the natural gas market have spawned the need for pipeline infrastructure planning. Previous studies have analyzed natural gas infrastructure development largely independent of the interactions of the natural gas sector with the broader economy. However, natural gas infrastructure development is strongly influenced by broader domestic and international socioeconomic conditions. We couple a global Human-Earth system model with state-level detail in the United States (GCAM-USA) that provides the broader socioeconomic context for natural gas supply and demand with a natural gas infrastructure investment model (NANGAM) to examine inter-state natural gas pipeline infrastructure development in the U.S. under a range of socioeconomic scenarios. Here we show that existing pipeline infrastructure in the U.S. is insufficient to satisfy the increasing demand for natural gas and investments in pipeline capacity will be required. However, the geographic distribution of investments within the U.S. is heterogeneous and depends on the capacity of existing infrastructure as well as the magnitude of increase in demand. Our results also illustrate the risks of under-utilization of pipeline capacity, in particular, under a scenario characterized by long-term systemic transitions toward a low-carbon economy. More broadly, our study highlights the value of integrated approaches to facilitate informed decision-making.

[1]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Forecasting natural gas supply in China: Production peak and import trends , 2012 .

[2]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Natural gas pricing reform in China: Getting closer to a market system? , 2015 .

[3]  Alain Haurie,et al.  A Coupled Bottom-Up/Top-Down Model for GHG Abatement Scenarios in the Swiss Housing Sector , 2005 .

[4]  Steven A. Gabriel,et al.  A Complementarity Model for the European Natural Gas Market , 2007 .

[5]  宮森 悠 ライブラリー Annual Energy Outlook 2000 , 2000 .

[6]  Panagiotis Andrianesis,et al.  A planning approach for reducing the impact of natural gas network on electricity markets , 2016 .

[7]  P. Kyle,et al.  Modeling the effect of climate change on U.S. state-level buildings energy demands in an integrated assessment framework , 2014 .

[8]  Matthew E. Oliver,et al.  Pipeline congestion and basis differentials , 2014 .

[9]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  MESSAGE-MACRO: Linking an energy supply model with a macroeconomic module and solving it iteratively , 2000 .

[10]  P. Kyle,et al.  Cost of power or power of cost: A U.S. modeling perspective , 2017 .

[11]  Philipp M. Richter,et al.  The Role of Natural Gas in a Low-Carbon Europe: Infrastructure and Supply Security , 2016 .

[12]  Hongbin Sun,et al.  An interval gas flow analysis in natural gas and electricity coupled networks considering the uncertainty of wind power , 2017 .

[13]  Matthew E. Oliver Economies of scale and scope in expansion of the U.S. natural gas pipeline network , 2015 .

[14]  J. Xu,et al.  Applying a third party access model for China’s gas pipeline network: an independent pipeline operator and congestion rent transfer , 2017 .

[15]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  MERGE. A model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies , 1995 .

[16]  M. Tavoni,et al.  A World Induced Technical Change Hybrid Model , 2006 .

[17]  Steven A. Gabriel,et al.  The World Gas Model , 2010 .

[18]  Mine K. Yücel,et al.  Deliverability and regional pricing in U.S. natural gas markets , 2008 .

[19]  J. Edmonds,et al.  The ObjECTS Framework for Integrated Assessment: Hybrid Modeling of Transportation , 2006 .

[20]  Stefan Lochner,et al.  European natural gas infrastructure: The impact of market developments on gas flows and physical market integration , 2013 .

[21]  Daniel Huppmann,et al.  Market power, fuel substitution and infrastructure - A large-scale equilibrium model of global energy markets , 2014 .

[22]  Henry D. Jacoby,et al.  Experiments with a Hybrid CGE-MARKAL Model1 , 2006 .

[23]  Page Kyle,et al.  Measuring progress from nationally determined contributions to mid-century strategies , 2017, Nature Climate Change.

[24]  Mita Bhattacharya,et al.  Natural gas, trade and sustainable growth: empirical evidence from the top gas consumers of the developing world , 2017 .

[26]  Daniel Huppmann,et al.  North American natural gas model: Impact of cross-border trade with Mexico , 2016 .

[27]  Sriram Sankaranarayanan,et al.  Sensitivity and covariance in stochastic complementarity problems with an application to North American natural gas markets , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Franziska Holz,et al.  Risks in global natural gas markets: Investment, hedging and trade , 2016 .

[29]  J. Eom,et al.  The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview , 2017 .

[30]  Abdullah Abusorrah,et al.  Security-Constrained Co-Optimization Planning of Electricity and Natural Gas Transportation Infrastructures , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[31]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Security-Constrained Unit Commitment With Natural Gas Transmission Constraints , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[32]  James R. McFarland,et al.  Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change? , 2015, Science.

[33]  Franziska Holz,et al.  The World Gas Model: A Multi-Period Mixed Complementarity Model for the Global Natural Gas Market , 2009 .

[34]  Joao P. S. Catalao,et al.  Multi-Period Integrated Framework of Generation, Transmission, and Natural Gas Grid Expansion Planning for Large-Scale Systems , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[35]  Jianzhou Wang,et al.  China’s natural gas production and consumption analysis based on the multicycle Hubbert model and rolling Grey model , 2016 .

[36]  EnergyInformationAdministration Annual Energy Outlook 2008 With Projections to 2030 , 2008 .

[37]  Steven A. Gabriel,et al.  Investigating the potential effects of U.S. LNG exports on global natural gas markets , 2014 .

[38]  T. Rutherford,et al.  Combining bottom-up and top-down , 2008 .

[39]  Michael Baldea,et al.  The effect of distributed electricity generation using natural gas on the electric and natural gas grids , 2016 .

[40]  Hailong Li,et al.  Study on the impacts of natural gas supply cost on gas flow and infrastructure deployment in China , 2016 .

[41]  Michael Chertkov,et al.  Coordinated Scheduling for Interdependent Electric Power and Natural Gas Infrastructures , 2017 .

[42]  Marshall A. Wise,et al.  The Value of Advanced End-Use Energy Technologies in Meeting U.S. Climate Policy Goals , 2011 .

[43]  L. Clarke,et al.  Climate Policy and the Long-Term Evolution of the U.S. Buildings Sector , 2007 .