The Mad1/Mad2 Complex as a Template for Mad2 Activation in the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint

BACKGROUND The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) imparts fidelity to chromosome segregation by delaying anaphase until all sister chromatid pairs have become bipolarly attached. Mad2 is a component of the SAC effector complex that sequesters Cdc20 to halt anaphase. In prometaphase, Mad2 is recruited to kinetochores with the help of Mad1, and it is activated to bind Cdc20. These events are linked to the existence of two distinct conformers of Mad2: a closed conformer bound to its kinetochore receptor Mad1 or its target in the checkpoint Cdc20 and an open conformer unbound to these ligands. RESULTS We investigated the mechanism of Mad2 recruitment to the kinetochore during checkpoint activation and subsequent transfer to Cdc20. We report that a closed conformer of Mad2 constitutively bound to Mad1, rather than Mad1 itself, is the kinetochore receptor for cytosolic open Mad2 and show that the interaction of open and closed Mad2 conformers is essential to sustain the SAC. CONCLUSIONS We propose that closed Mad2 bound to Mad1 represents a template for the conversion of open Mad2 into closed Mad2 bound to Cdc20. This simple model, which we have named the "Mad2 template" model, predicts a mechanism for cytosolic propagation of the spindle checkpoint signal away from kinetochores.

[1]  E. Koonin,et al.  The HORMA domain: a common structural denominator in mitotic checkpoints, chromosome synapsis and DNA repair. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[2]  E. Nigg,et al.  Role of Hec1 in Spindle Checkpoint Signaling and Kinetochore Recruitment of Mad1/Mad2 , 2002, Science.

[3]  E. Salmon,et al.  Mad2 and BubR1 function in a single checkpoint pathway that responds to a loss of tension. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[4]  Andrea Musacchio,et al.  Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1–Mad2 core complex: implications of a ‘safety belt’ binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[5]  A. Murray,et al.  Visualization of Mad2 Dynamics at Kinetochores, along Spindle Fibers, and at Spindle Poles in Living Cells , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  Viji M. Draviam,et al.  Timing and checkpoints in the regulation of mitotic progression. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[7]  Andrew W. Murray,et al.  MAD3 Encodes a Novel Component of the Spindle Checkpoint Which Interacts with Bub3p, Cdc20p, and Mad2p , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[8]  B. Tunquist,et al.  Spindle checkpoint proteins Mad1 and Mad2 are required for cytostatic factor–mediated metaphase arrest , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  M. Kirschner,et al.  The checkpoint protein MAD2 and the mitotic regulator CDC20 form a ternary complex with the anaphase-promoting complex to control anaphase initiation. , 1998, Genes & development.

[10]  E. Salmon,et al.  Inducing precocious anaphase in cultured mammalian cells. , 2002, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[11]  A. Murray,et al.  Budding yeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint. , 1998, Science.

[12]  J. Rizo,et al.  Conformation‐specific binding of p31comet antagonizes the function of Mad2 in the spindle checkpoint , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[13]  Hongtao Yu,et al.  Mad2-Independent inhibition of APCCdc20 by the mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1. , 2001, Developmental cell.

[14]  Hongtao Yu,et al.  The spindle checkpoint, aneuploidy, and cancer , 2004, Oncogene.

[15]  Andrew W. Murray,et al.  Spindle Checkpoint Protein Xmad1 Recruits Xmad2 to Unattached Kinetochores , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  Elliot Botvinick,et al.  Dynamics of Centromere and Kinetochore Proteins Implications for Checkpoint Signaling and Silencing , 2004, Current Biology.

[17]  A. Amon.  The spindle checkpoint. , 1999, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[18]  Hongtao Yu,et al.  The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein undergoes similar major conformational changes upon binding to either Mad1 or Cdc20. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[19]  Rey-Huei Chen,et al.  BubR1 is essential for kinetochore localization of other spindle checkpoint proteins and its phosphorylation requires Mad1 , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[20]  Jan-Michael Peters,et al.  The anaphase-promoting complex: proteolysis in mitosis and beyond. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[21]  A. Murray,et al.  The spindle checkpoint of budding yeast depends on a tight complex between the Mad1 and Mad2 proteins. , 1999, Molecular biology of the cell.

[22]  A. Mikhailov,et al.  DNA Damage during Mitosis in Human Cells Delays the Metaphase/Anaphase Transition via the Spindle-Assembly Checkpoint , 2002, Current Biology.

[23]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Structure of the Mad2 spindle assembly checkpoint protein and its interaction with Cdc20 , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[24]  G. Fang,et al.  Checkpoint protein BubR1 acts synergistically with Mad2 to inhibit anaphase-promoting complex. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[25]  G. Lucchini,et al.  Bub3 interaction with Mad2, Mad3 and Cdc20 is mediated by WD40 repeats and does not require intact kinetochores , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[26]  G. Chan,et al.  Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2 , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[27]  E. Salmon,et al.  Spindle Checkpoint Protein Dynamics at Kinetochores in Living Cells , 2004, Current Biology.

[28]  Emma Lees,et al.  Identification of an Overlapping Binding Domain on Cdc20 for Mad2 and Anaphase-Promoting Complex: Model for Spindle Checkpoint Regulation , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[29]  J. Rizo,et al.  The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein has two distinct natively folded states , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[30]  Andrej Shevchenko,et al.  The CCT chaperonin promotes activation of the anaphase-promoting complex through the generation of functional Cdc20. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[31]  Budding yeast Cdc20 , 1998 .

[32]  A. Murray,et al.  Localization of Mad2 to Kinetochores Depends on Microtubule Attachment, Not Tension , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[33]  K. Hardwick,et al.  Fission Yeast Mad3p Is Required for Mad2p To Inhibit the Anaphase-Promoting Complex and Localizes to Kinetochores in a Bub1p-, Bub3p-, and Mph1p-Dependent Manner , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[34]  Tomohiro Matsumoto,et al.  Identification of a MAD2‐binding protein, CMT2, and its role in mitosis , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[35]  G. Gorbsky,et al.  Rapid microtubule-independent dynamics of Cdc20 at kinetochores and centrosomes in mammalian cells , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[36]  Christian Haass,et al.  Games Played by Rogue Proteins in Prion Disorders and Alzheimer's Disease , 2003, Science.

[37]  A. Musacchio,et al.  The spindle checkpoint: structural insights into dynamic signalling , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[38]  Geert J P L Kops,et al.  Lethality to human cancer cells through massive chromosome loss by inhibition of the mitotic checkpoint. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  R. Agami,et al.  Survivin is required for a sustained spindle checkpoint arrest in response to lack of tension , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[40]  Hongtao Yu,et al.  Regulation of APC-Cdc20 by the spindle checkpoint. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[41]  J. R. Daum,et al.  Protein dynamics at the kinetochore: cell cycle regulation of the metaphase to anaphase transition , 1999, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[42]  K. Helin,et al.  Mad2 binding to Mad1 and Cdc20, rather than oligomerization, is required for the spindle checkpoint , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[43]  Rey-Huei Chen,et al.  Spindle checkpoint requires Mad1-bound and Mad1-free Mad2. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[44]  Kim Nasmyth,et al.  Segregating Sister Genomes: The Molecular Biology of Chromosome Separation , 2002, Science.

[45]  E. Salmon,et al.  Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin drives kinetochore protein transport to the spindle poles and has a role in mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.