The Multifaceted Nature of Robotic Companionship when Presented as a Secondary Function

Companion robots have been suggested as a promising technology for older adults who experience loneliness. However, healthy older adults commonly reject robots designed to be an ”artificial friend”. We follow the approach of ”companionship as a secondary function”, in which a non-humanoid robot is designed with a primary function that older adults perceive as appropriate, and a secondary function of companionship. In a Zoom-based exploratory need-study we unfold how older adults perceive the various aspects of a robot’s ”companionship” as a secondary function. Our qualitative analysis reveals several use cases that older adults find to be appropriate for their daily routine, and classify them into three high-level categories: companionship as ”attentive to me”, companionship as ”looking after me”, and companionship as ”experiencing together with me”. Our findings indicate that robot companionship, when designed as a secondary function, is perceived by older adults as a multifaceted social experience.

[1]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  The Role of Healthcare Robots for Older People at Home: A Review , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[2]  Mason Bretan,et al.  Chronicles of a Robotic Musical Companion , 2014, NIME.

[3]  Guy Hoffman,et al.  The Greeting Machine: An Abstract Robotic Object for Opening Encounters , 2018, 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[4]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Human emotion and the uncanny valley: A GLM, MDS, and Isomap analysis of robot video ratings , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[5]  Hadas Erel,et al.  Robots are Always Social: Robotic Movements are Automatically Interpreted as Social Cues , 2019, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[6]  C. McCreadie,et al.  The acceptability of assistive technology to older people , 2005, Ageing and Society.

[7]  N. Jecker You’ve got a friend in me: sociable robots for older adults in an age of global pandemics , 2020, Ethics and Information Technology.

[8]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  What is a robot companion - friend, assistant or butler? , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[9]  T. Fulmer,et al.  Successful aging. , 2002, The American journal of nursing.

[10]  Ya-Huei Wu,et al.  Designing robots for the elderly: appearance issue and beyond. , 2012, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[11]  Guy Hoffman,et al.  Home robotic devices for older adults: Opportunities and concerns , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  J. Morse,et al.  Situating and Constructing Diversity in Semi-Structured Interviews , 2015, Global qualitative nursing research.

[13]  Rjg Raymond Opdenakker Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research , 2006 .

[14]  T. Tamura,et al.  Is an entertainment robot useful in the care of elderly people with severe dementia? , 2004, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[15]  Rajiv Khosla,et al.  Socially Assistive Robots in Elderly Care: A Mixed-Method Systematic Literature Review , 2014, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[16]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Tuck Wah Leong,et al.  Co-design and Robots: A Case Study of a Robot Dog for Aging People , 2016, ICSR.

[18]  Hadas Erel,et al.  Companionship Is Not a Function: The Effect of a Novel Robotic Object on Healthy Older Adults' Feelings of "Being-Seen" , 2020, CHI.

[19]  Wendy A. Rogers,et al.  Domestic Robots for Older Adults: Attitudes, Preferences, and Potential , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[20]  Eva Berner,et al.  Semi-Autonomous Teleoperated Learning In-Home Service Robots for Elderly Care : A Qualitative Study on Needs and Perceptions of Elderly People, Family Caregivers, and Professional Caregivers , 2010 .

[21]  Elaine B. Hyder,et al.  The ELDer project: social, emotional, and environmental factors in the design of eldercare technologies , 2000, CUU '00.

[22]  Laurel D. Riek,et al.  Reframing Assistive Robots to Promote Successful Aging , 2018, ACM Trans. Hum. Robot Interact..

[23]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  The Grand Challenges in Socially Assistive Robotics , 2007 .

[24]  D. Knook,et al.  Successful aging in the oldest old: Who can be characterized as successfully aged? , 2001, Archives of internal medicine.

[25]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Mechanical Ottoman: How Robotic Furniture Offers and Withdraws Support , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[26]  Amanda J. C. Sharkey,et al.  Interaction with the Paro robot may reduce psychophysiological stress responses , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[27]  Wan Ling Chang,et al.  A Robot of My Own: Participatory Design of Socially Assistive Robots for Independently Living Older Adults Diagnosed with Depression , 2015, HCI.

[28]  Wendy Ju Approachability : How People Interpret Automatic Door Movement as Gesture , 2008 .

[29]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  The huggable: a therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch , 2006, CCNC 2006. 2006 3rd IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, 2006..

[30]  C. N. Scanaill,et al.  A Review of Approaches to Mobility Telemonitoring of the Elderly in Their Living Environment , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  K. Vogeley,et al.  Toward a second-person neuroscience 1 , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[32]  J. Rowe,et al.  Human aging: usual and successful. , 1987, Science.

[33]  Guy Hoffman,et al.  Effects of robotic companionship on music enjoyment and agent perception , 2013, 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[34]  Richard H. Williams,et al.  Processes of aging : social and psychological perspectives , 1965 .

[35]  Anne Marie Piper,et al.  Rethinking the Design of Robotic Pets for Older Adults , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[36]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Psychological and Social Effects of One Year Robot Assisted Activity on Elderly People at a Health Service Facility for the Aged , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[37]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  Configuring participation: on how we involve people in design , 2013, CHI.

[38]  Håkan Eftring,et al.  What Older People Expect of Robots: A Mixed Methods Approach , 2013, ICSR.

[39]  Günter Wallner,et al.  HOMIE: an artificial companion for elderly people , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[40]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[41]  Peter J. Bentley,et al.  Investigating the Suitability of Social Robots for the Wellbeing of the Elderly , 2011, ACII.

[42]  J. Broekens,et al.  Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review , 2009 .

[43]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Attitudinal and Intentional Acceptance of Domestic Robots by Younger and Older Adults , 2009, HCI.

[44]  Austin Lee Nichols,et al.  The Good-Subject Effect: Investigating Participant Demand Characteristics , 2008, The Journal of general psychology.