Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the evaluation of antihypertensive treatment: additional information from a large data base.

Aims of our study were i) to compare in a large number of hypertensive subjects the relative effect of antihypertensive treatment on clinic (C) blood pressure (BP) and various ambulatory (A) BP components, and ii) to determine whether antihypertensive treatment affects BP variability. In 266 mild essential hypertensive outpatients (age: 18-78 years) CBP (trough measurements) and ABP (Spacelabs 90202 or 90207) were measured after 3 to 4 weeks of wash-out and after 4 to 8 weeks of treatment with an ACE-inhibitor (n = 135) or a calcium-antagonist (n = 131). ABP recordings were analyzed to obtain average 24 h, day-time (6 a.m. to midnight) and night-time (midnight to 6 a.m.) systolic and diastolic BP values and standard deviations (BP variabilities). Treatment reduced both CBP and ABP. Treatment-induced changes in CBP showed a poor correlation with those in 24h, day- and night-time BP (r never > 0.23) and the correlation was poor also when trough ABP (mean of last 2 h) was considered. Twenty-four hour, day- and night-time BP were similarly reduced by treatment with a direct relationship between the initial BP values and the subsequent BP falls. BP standard deviations were also reduced by treatment in relation to the pretreatment values but the overall reduction was small, limited to the day-time and proportional or less than proportional to the reduction in mean values, with no changes or an increase in variation coefficients. The effects of ACE-inhibitor and calcium-antagonist treatments were superimposable. Our results from a large data base show that antihypertensive treatment effectively reduces all ABP components. The reduction cannot be predicted by the concomitant fall in CBP but it relates to the initial ABP values. Treatment has a limited effect on BP variability, this being the case both for ACE-inhibitors and calcium-antagonists.

[1]  G. Schillaci,et al.  Circadian blood pressure changes and left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension. , 1990, Circulation.

[2]  B. Waeber,et al.  Blood pressure response to antihypertensive therapy: ambulatory versus office blood pressure readings. , 1985, Journal of hypertension.

[3]  G Parati,et al.  Relationship of 24-hour blood pressure mean and variability to severity of target-organ damage in hypertension. , 1987, Journal of hypertension.

[4]  G. Parati,et al.  Lack of placebo effect on ambulatory blood pressure. , 1995, American journal of hypertension.

[5]  N. Markandu,et al.  Contrasting effects of nifedipine, captopril, and propranolol in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. , 1982, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology.

[6]  R. de Gaudemaris,et al.  Comparison of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium antagonists in the treatment of mild to moderate systemic hypertension, according to baseline ambulatory blood pressure level. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  C. Bulpitt,et al.  The assessment of the relationship between blood pressure and sodium intake using whole-day, daytime and overnight urine collections. , 1991, Journal of hypertension.

[8]  B. Gould,et al.  DOES PLACEBO LOWER BLOOD-PRESSURE? , 1981, The Lancet.

[9]  J. Staessen,et al.  Response of ambulatory blood pressure to antihypertensive therapy guided by clinic pressure. , 1993, American journal of hypertension.

[10]  M. Weber,et al.  Characterization of antihypertensive therapy by whole-day blood pressure monitoring. , 1988, JAMA.

[11]  A Pedotti,et al.  Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Variabilities in Normotensive and Hypertensive Human Beings , 1983, Circulation research.

[12]  P. Palatini,et al.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the assessment of antihypertensive treatment: 24-h blood pressure control with lacidipine once a day. , 1991, Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension.

[13]  K. O’malley,et al.  Ambulatory blood pressure measurement in the evaluation of blood pressure lowering drugs. , 1989, Journal of hypertension.

[14]  G. Parati,et al.  Effect of placebo on 24-h non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure. , 1991, Journal of hypertension.

[15]  G. Parati,et al.  Evaluation of noninvasive blood pressure monitoring devices Spacelabs 90202 and 90207 versus resting and ambulatory 24-hour intra-arterial blood pressure. , 1992, Hypertension.

[16]  G. Parati,et al.  Calcium Antagonists and Neural Control of Circulation in Essential Hypertension , 1987, Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension.

[17]  P. Erne,et al.  Factors influencing the hypotensive effects of calcium antagonists. , 1983, Hypertension.

[18]  C. Palombo,et al.  Evaluation of the antihypertensive effect of once-a-day trandolapril by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring , 1992 .

[19]  P. Palatini,et al.  Clinical relevance of nighttime blood pressure and of daytime blood pressure variability. , 1992, Archives of internal medicine.

[20]  G Parati,et al.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the evaluation of antihypertensive treatment. , 1989, The American journal of medicine.

[21]  P. Palatini,et al.  Effect of timing of administration on the plasma ACE inhibitory activity and the antihypertensive effect of quinapril , 1992, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[22]  J. Drayer,et al.  BP as a determinant of cardiac left ventricular muscle mass. , 1983, Archives of internal medicine.

[23]  A Pedotti,et al.  Continuous vs intermittent blood pressure measurements in estimating 24-hour average blood pressure. , 1983, Hypertension.

[24]  Giuseppe Mancia,et al.  EFFECTS OF BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT BY THE DOCTOR ON PATIENT'S BLOOD PRESSURE AND HEART RATE , 1983, The Lancet.

[25]  W. White,et al.  Twenty-four-hour blood pressure load as a surrogate end-point in assessing antihypertensive therapy. , 1993, Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension.

[26]  Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al.  1993 guidelines for the management of mild hypertension. Memorandum from a World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension meeting. Guidelines Subcommittee of the WHO/ISH Mild Hypertension Liaison Committee. , 1993, Hypertension.

[27]  G Mancia,et al.  Prognostic value of 24-hour blood pressure variability , 1993, Journal of hypertension.

[28]  F. Mee,et al.  Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure in men and women aged 17 to 80 years: the Allied Irish Bank Study. , 1991, Journal of hypertension.

[29]  J. Laragh,et al.  How common is white coat hypertension? , 1988, JAMA.

[30]  V. Papademetriou,et al.  Application of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in differentiating between antihypertensive agents. , 1993, The American journal of medicine.

[31]  J. Floras ANTIHYPERTENSIVE TREATMENT, MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION, AND NOCTURNAL MYOCARDIAL ISCHAEMIA , 1988, The Lancet.

[32]  A. Dupont,et al.  Placebo does not lower ambulatory blood pressure. , 1987, British journal of clinical pharmacology.