The Shades of Grey: Datenherrschaft in Data-Driven Gamification

Data-driven gamification refers to the use of data collection and data science methods together with gamification practices in order to improve the selected aspects of a service or a product. As new innovations cause new ethical questions, this study surveys possible ethical problems of data-driven gamification. Precisely, we focus on the ethical question of using data collected from a user to modify behaviour of the user. Instead of a clearly bright or dark side of the force, we focus on the ethically grey area where intentions might be ethically justified while the results are not. To discuss this dilemma, we borrow the concept of ‘Datenherrschaft’—mastery over information—and present a philosophical inquiry of five cases: Leisure, Governmental, Healthcare, Educational and Workplace solutions. As a result, this study shows that there are clearly ethical issues, different shades of grey, related to the data-driven gamification and future work is needed in order assess, analyze and answer the presented problems. Copyright © by the paper’s authors. Copying permitted for private and academic purposes. In: M. Meder, A. Rapp, T. Plumbaum, and F. Hopfgartner (eds.): Proceedings of the Data-Driven Gamification Design Workshop, Tampere, Finland, 20-September-2017, published at http://ceur-ws.org

[1]  Kai Kimppa,et al.  Wilma ruined my life: how an educational system became the criminal record for the adolescents , 2016, CSOC.

[2]  Sanna Salanterä,et al.  Determinants of tobacco-related health literacy: A qualitative study with early adolescents. , 2016, International journal of nursing studies.

[3]  Riichiro Mizoguchi,et al.  The Bright and Dark Sides of Gamification , 2016, ITS.

[4]  Jani Koskinen.  Datenherrschaft – an Ethically Justified Solution to the Problem of Ownership of Patient Information , 2016 .

[5]  Richard T. Herschel,et al.  Ethics & Big Data , 2017 .

[6]  Daniel J. Veit,et al.  Gamification - A Novel Phenomenon or a New Wrapping for Existing Concepts? , 2015, ICIS.

[7]  Rachel C. Callan,et al.  How to Avoid the Dark Side of Gamification: Ten Business Scenarios and Their Unintended Consequences , 2015 .

[8]  M. Heidegger.  The question concerning technology , 2024, East Asian Journal of Philosophy.

[9]  T. Beauchamp,et al.  Principles of biomedical ethics , 1991 .

[10]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Does Gamification Work? -- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  L. Miles,et al.  2000 , 2000, RDH.

[12]  Joshua A.T. Fairfield,et al.  Big Data, Big Problems: Emerging Issues in the Ethics of Data Science and Journalism , 2014 .

[13]  Sami Hyrynsalmi,et al.  The Dark Side of Gamification: How We Should Stop Worrying and Study also the Negative Impacts of Bringing Game Design Elements to Everywhere , 2017, GamiFIN.

[14]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  Understanding persuasion contexts in health gamification: A systematic analysis of gamified health behavior change support systems literature , 2016, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[15]  Lotta Kauhanen,et al.  The advantages and limitations of digital games in children's health promotion , 2014 .

[16]  Harri Sarsa.  Does Gamification Work? A Literature Review , 2013 .

[17]  Mila Versteeg.  Ethics & Gamification design: a moral framework for taking responsibility , 2013 .

[18]  Vasant Dhar,et al.  Data science and prediction , 2012, CACM.

[19]  John Haugeland,et al.  Heidegger on Being a Person , 1982 .

[20]  Tae Wan Kim,et al.  More than just a game: ethical issues in gamification , 2016, Ethics and Information Technology.

[21]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  How Should Health Data Be Used? , 2016, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.