Accurate First Impressions Leave a Lasting Impression

Above and beyond the benefits of biases such as positivity and assumed similarity, does the accuracy of our first impressions have immediate and long-term effects on relationship development? Assessing accuracy as distinctive self-other agreement, we found that more accurate personality impressions of new classmates were marginally associated with greater liking concurrently, and significantly predicted greater interaction throughout the semester and greater liking and interest in future interactions by the end of the semester. Importantly, greater distinctive self-other agreement continued to promote social interaction even after controlling for Time 1 liking, suggesting that these positive effects of accuracy operate independently of initial liking. Forming positively biased first impressions was a strong predictor of both initial and longer term relationship development, while assumed similarity showed strong initial but not long-term associations. In sum, independent of the benefits of biased impressions, forming accurate impressions has a positive impact on relationship development among new acquaintances.

[1]  S. Srivastava,et al.  The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. , 1999 .

[2]  D. Ariely,et al.  Less is more: the lure of ambiguity, or why familiarity breeds contempt. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  F. Al-Shamali,et al.  Author Biographies. , 2015, Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation.

[4]  Michael Sunnafrank,et al.  At First Sight: Persistent Relational Effects of Get-Acquainted Conversations , 2004 .

[5]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  A Leap of Faith? Positive Illusions in Romantic Relationships , 1997 .

[7]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Accuracy and bias in the perception of the partner in a close relationship. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  R. Furr A framework for profile similarity: integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness. , 2008, Journal of personality.

[9]  J. C. Biesanz,et al.  Do We Know When Our Impressions of Others Are Valid? Evidence for Realistic Accuracy Awareness in First Impressions of Personality , 2011 .

[10]  Paul W. Eastwick,et al.  Familiarity does indeed promote attraction in live interaction. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Accuracy and Biases in Newlyweds' Perceptions of Each Other , 2009, Psychological science.

[12]  D. Leising,et al.  The letter of recommendation effect in informant ratings of personality. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  J. C. Biesanz,et al.  The Cost of Forming More Accurate Impressions , 2010, Psychological science.

[14]  A. L. Edwards The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research , 1958 .

[15]  Lorne Campbell,et al.  The unique and combined benefits of accuracy and positive bias in relationships , 2010 .

[16]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[17]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. , 1996 .

[18]  Jaap J. A. Denissen,et al.  In the eye of the beholder: perceived, actual, and peer-rated similarity in personality, communication, and friendship intensity during the acquaintanceship process. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  J. C. Biesanz,et al.  The Social Accuracy Model of Interpersonal Perception: Assessing Individual Differences in Perceptive and Expressive Accuracy , 2010, Multivariate behavioral research.

[20]  D. Funder,et al.  Congruence of others' and self-judgments of personality. , 1997 .

[21]  G. L. Lorenzo,et al.  What Is Beautiful Is Good and More Accurately Understood , 2010, Psychological science.

[22]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Kindred spirits? The benefits of egocentrism in close relationships. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  D. Byrne,et al.  Attraction and similarity of personality characteristics. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  The measurement of interpersonal sensitivity: Consideration of design, components, and unit of analysis. , 2001 .

[25]  J. C. Biesanz,et al.  Accuracy and assumed similarity in first impressions of personality: Differing associations at different levels of analysis , 2012 .

[26]  P. Borkenau,et al.  Effects of self‐enhancement on agreement on personality profiles , 2009 .

[27]  D. Ariely,et al.  Does familiarity breed contempt or liking? Comment on Reis, Maniaci, Caprariello, Eastwick, and Finkel (2011). , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  A. Gelman Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[29]  Elizabeth W. Dunn,et al.  Your Best Self Helps Reveal Your True Self , 2012 .

[30]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[31]  J. C. Biesanz,et al.  Through the looking glass clearly: accuracy and assumed similarity in well-adjusted individuals' first impressions. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  L. Cronbach Processes affecting scores on understanding of others and assumed similarity. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  Lisa A. Neff,et al.  To know you is to love you: the implications of global adoration and specific accuracy for marital relationships. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.