Spectacle lens compensation in the pigmented guinea pig

When a young growing eye wears a negative or positive spectacle lens, the eye compensates for the imposed defocus by accelerating or slowing its elongation rate so that the eye becomes emmetropic with the lens in place. Such spectacle lens compensation has been shown in chicks, tree-shrews, marmosets and rhesus monkeys. We have developed a model of emmetropisation using the guinea pig in order to establish a rapid and easy mammalian model. Guinea pigs were raised with a +4D, +2D, 0D (plano), -2D or -4D lens worn in front of one eye for 10 days or a +4D on one eye and a 0D on the fellow eye for 5 days or no lens on either eye (littermate controls). Refractive error and ocular distances were measured at the end of these periods. The difference in refractive error between the eyes was linearly related to the lens-power worn. A significant compensatory response to a +4D lens occurred after only 5 days and near full compensation occurred after 10 days when the effective imposed refractive error was between 0D and 8D of hyperopia. Eyes wearing plano lenses were slightly more myopic than their fellow eyes (-1.7D) but showed no difference in ocular length. Relative to the plano group, plus and minus lenses induced relative hyperopic or myopic differences between the two eyes, inhibited or accelerated their ocular growth, and expanded or decreased the relative thickness of the choroid, respectively. In individual animals, the difference between the eyes in vitreous chamber depth and choroid thickness reached +/-100 and +/-40microm, respectively, and was significantly correlated with the induced refractive differences. Although eyes responded differentially to plus and minus lenses, the plus lenses generally corrected the hyperopia present in these young animals. The effective refractive error induced by the lenses ranged between -2D of myopic defocus to +10D of hyperopic defocus with the lens in place, and compensation was highly linear between 0D and 8D of effective hyperopic defocus, beyond which the compensation was reduced. We conclude that in the guinea pig, ocular growth and refractive error are visually regulated in a bidirectional manner to plus and minus lenses, but that the eye responds in a graded manner to imposed effective hyperopic defocus.

[1]  N. Mcbrien,et al.  Modulation of scleral DNA synthesis in development of and recovery from induced axial myopia in the tree shrew. , 1999, Experimental eye research.

[2]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[3]  Earl L. Smith,et al.  The role of optical defocus in regulating refractive development in infant monkeys , 1999, Vision Research.

[4]  S. Metlapally,et al.  The effect of positive lens defocus on ocular growth and emmetropization in the tree shrew. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[5]  R. Held,et al.  Effects of spectacle intervention on the progression of myopia in children. , 1999, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[6]  S. McFadden,et al.  Form-deprivation myopia in the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus) , 2006, Vision Research.

[7]  Adrian Glasser,et al.  Accommodation, refractive error and eye growth in chickens , 1988, Vision Research.

[8]  Further evidence that chick eyes use the sign of blur in spectacle lens compensation , 2003, Vision Research.

[9]  J. Qu,et al.  Recovery from axial myopia induced by a monocularly deprived facemask in adolescent (7-week-old) guinea pigs , 2007, Vision Research.

[10]  Earl L. Smith,et al.  Spectacle lenses alter eye growth and the refractive status of young monkeys , 1995, Nature Medicine.

[11]  S. McFadden,et al.  Emmetropization and schematic eye models in developing pigmented guinea pigs , 2007, Vision Research.

[12]  Neville A. McBrien,et al.  Normal development of refractive state and ocular component dimensions in the tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri) , 1992, Vision Research.

[13]  M. Corballis,et al.  Orientation sensitivity of the N1 evoked by letters and digits. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[14]  T T Norton,et al.  Animal models of emmetropization: matching axial length to the focal plane. , 1995, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[15]  D. Goss.  Overcorrection as a Means of Slowing Myopic Progression , 1984, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[16]  J. Wallman,et al.  Vision-dependent changes in the choroidal thickness of macaque monkeys. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  M. Tigges,et al.  Emmetropization in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta): birth to young adulthood. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  Earl L. Smith,et al.  Recovery from form-deprivation myopia in rhesus monkeys. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  Andrew R Whatham,et al.  Compensatory changes in eye growth and refraction induced by daily wear of soft contact lenses in young marmosets , 2001, Vision Research.

[20]  C. Wildsoet,et al.  Choroidal thickness changes during altered eye growth and refractive state in a primate. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  E. Mugnaini,et al.  Fine structure of the choroidal coat of the avian eye , 1997, Anatomy and Embryology.

[22]  Lynn Marran,et al.  Moving the retina: Choroidal modulation of refractive state , 1995, Vision Research.

[23]  Josh Wallman,et al.  Choroidal and scleral mechanisms of compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks , 1995, Vision Research.

[24]  S. Saw,et al.  Myopia: attempts to arrest progression , 2002, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  S. McFadden,et al.  Retinoic acid signals the direction of ocular elongation in the guinea pig eye , 2004, Vision Research.

[26]  E. Smith,et al.  Developmental visual system anomalies and the limits of emmetropization. , 1999, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[27]  E. Irving,et al.  Refractive plasticity of the developing chick eye , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.