Perceptual Quality Assessment of 3d Point Clouds

The real-world applications of 3D point clouds have been growing rapidly in recent years, but effective approaches and datasets to assess the quality of 3D point clouds are largely lacking. In this work, we construct so far the largest 3D point cloud database with diverse source content and distortion patterns, and carry out a comprehensive subjective user study. We construct 20 high quality, realistic, and omni-directional point clouds of diverse contents. We then apply downsampling, Gaussian noise, and three types of compression algorithms to create 740 distorted point clouds. Based on the database, we carry out a subjective experiment to evaluate the quality of distorted point clouds, and perform a point cloud encoder comparison. Our statistical analysis find that existing point cloud quality assessment models are limited in predicting subjective quality ratings. The database will be made publicly available to facilitate future research.

[1]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[2]  Marc Levoy,et al.  A volumetric method for building complex models from range images , 1996, SIGGRAPH.

[3]  Rufael Mekuria,et al.  Evaluation criteria for PCC (Point Cloud Compression) , 2016 .

[4]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  Point Cloud Subjective Evaluation Methodology based on 2D Rendering , 2018, 2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[5]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[6]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2006, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[7]  Catarina Brites,et al.  Subjective and objective quality evaluation of 3D point cloud denoising algorithms , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo Workshops (ICMEW).

[8]  Michael M. Kazhdan,et al.  Screened poisson surface reconstruction , 2013, TOGS.

[9]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  Point Cloud Quality Assessment Metric Based on Angular Similarity , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME).

[10]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  On subjective and objective quality evaluation of point cloud geometry , 2017, 2017 Ninth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[11]  Sugato Chakravarty,et al.  Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures , 1995 .

[12]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  A novel methodology for quality assessment of voxelized point clouds , 2018, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[13]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  Point cloud subjective evaluation methodology based on reconstructed surfaces , 2018, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[14]  Dong Tian,et al.  Geometric distortion metrics for point cloud compression , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[15]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[16]  Rufael Mekuria,et al.  Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Point Cloud Codec for Tele-Immersive Video , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[17]  Rufael Mekuria,et al.  Emerging MPEG Standards for Point Cloud Compression , 2019, IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems.

[18]  Catarina Brites,et al.  Subjective and objective quality evaluation of compressed point clouds , 2017, 2017 IEEE 19th International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP).

[19]  Paolo Cignoni,et al.  MeshLab: an Open-Source Mesh Processing Tool , 2008, Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference.

[20]  Pan Gao,et al.  Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment for Volumetric Video Compression , 2019, IQSP.