Rational Ignorance in Education: A Field Experiment in Student Plagiarism

Plagiarism appears to be a common problem among college students, yet there is little evidence on the effectiveness of interventions designed to minimize plagiarism. This study presents the results of a field experiment that evaluated the effects of a web-based educational tutorial in reducing plagiarism. We found that assignment to the treatment group substantially reduced the likelihood of plagiarism, particularly among student with lower SAT scores who had the highest rates of plagiarism. A followup survey suggests that the intervention reduced plagiarism by increasing student knowledge rather than by increasing the perceived probabilities of detection and punishment.

[1]  J. Welsh,et al.  The Little Book of Plagiarism , 2008 .

[2]  Bob S. Brown,et al.  Explaining Variations in the Level of Academic Dishonesty in Studies of College Students: Some New Evidence , 2001 .

[3]  Stephen G. Donald,et al.  Inference with Difference-in-Differences and Other Panel Data , 2007, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[4]  Donald L. Mccabe,et al.  Faculty responses to academic dishonesty: The influence of student honor codes , 1993 .

[5]  Linda Klebe Trevino,et al.  Individual and Contextual Influences on Academic Dishonesty: A Multicampus Investigation , 1997 .

[6]  A. Schneider Why Professors Don't Do More To Stop Students Who Cheat. , 1999 .

[7]  C. Thompson,et al.  Unintended Lessons: Plagiarism and the University , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[8]  Michael Boss Economic theory of democracy , 1974 .

[9]  Donald L. Mccabe Cheating among college and university students: A North American perspective , 2005 .

[10]  L. Power University Students’ Perceptions of Plagiarism , 2009 .

[11]  D. Mueller Public choice II , 1989 .

[12]  John C. Wright,et al.  Cheating: Student/Faculty Views and Responsibilities , 1974 .

[13]  Daniel F. McCaffrey,et al.  Bias reduction in standard errors for linear regression with multi-stage samples , 2002 .

[14]  Shifra Baruchson-Arbib,et al.  Printed Versus Internet Plagiarism: A Study of Students' Perception , 2004 .

[15]  A. C. Singhal,et al.  Factors in Students' Dishonesty , 1982 .

[16]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[17]  G. Harrison,et al.  Field experiments , 1924, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[18]  D. Paulhus,et al.  Investigating Academic Dishonesty with Concrete Measures , 2005 .

[19]  David A. Rettinger,et al.  Situational and Personal Causes of Student Cheating , 2009 .

[20]  Patrick M. Scanlon,et al.  Internet Plagiarism among College Students. , 2002 .

[21]  Rebecca Moore Howard,et al.  Plagiarism in the Internet Age. , 2009 .

[22]  P. Jackson Plagiarism Instruction Online: Assessing Undergraduate Students’ Ability to Avoid Plagiarism , 2006 .

[23]  Thomas D. Snyder,et al.  Digest of Education Statistics , 1994 .

[24]  E. Duflo,et al.  How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? , 2001 .

[25]  Monitoring Costs and Tolerance Levels for Classroom Cheating , 2003 .

[26]  Randy Genereux,et al.  Circumstances surrounding cheating: A questionnaire study of college students , 1995 .

[27]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion , 2008 .

[28]  Linda Klebe Trevino,et al.  Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research , 2001 .

[29]  Elizabeth M. Nuss Academic Integrity: Comparing Faculty and Student Attitudes. , 1984 .

[30]  Lidija Bilic-Zulle,et al.  Is There an Effective Approach to Deterring Students from Plagiarizing? , 2008, Sci. Eng. Ethics.