Mutualism Promotes Diversity and Stability in a Simple Artificial Ecosystem

This work investigates the effect of ecological interactions between organisms on the evolutionary dynamics of a community. A spatially explicit, individual-based model is presented, in which organisms compete for space and resources. We investigated how introducing the potential for mutualistic relationships (where the presence of one type of organism stimulates the growth of another type, and vice versa) affected the evolutionary dynamics of the system. Without this potential, one or a small number of individual types of organisms dominated the simulated community from the onset. When mutualistic relationships were allowed, many persisting types arose, with new types appearing continually. Furthermore, we investigated how the stability of the community differed when mutualistic relationships were allowed and disallowed. Our results suggest that the existence of mutualistic relationships improved community stability.

[1]  Timothy J. Taylor,et al.  From artificial evolution to artificial life , 1999 .

[2]  387 Riley St,et al.  Evolvability in the Context of the Biosphere , .

[3]  Michael F. Allen,et al.  The ecology of mycorrhizae , 1990 .

[4]  C. Titus Brown,et al.  Visualizing Evolutionary Activity of Genotypes , 1998, Artificial Life.

[5]  V. Grimm.  Ten years of individual-based modelling in ecology: what have we learned and what could we learn in the future? , 1999 .

[6]  J. Bown,et al.  Towards a general theory of biodiversity , 2001, Nature.

[7]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[8]  John H. Holland,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity , 1995 .

[9]  N. Packard,et al.  A classification of long-term evolutionary dynamics , 1998 .

[10]  Phil Husbands,et al.  The View From Elsewhere: Perspectives on ALife Modeling , 2002, Artificial Life.

[11]  Terry Jones,et al.  The Ecology of Echo , 1997, Artificial Life.

[12]  John von Neumann,et al.  Theory Of Self Reproducing Automata , 1967 .

[13]  N. Pierce.  Origin of Species , 1914, Nature.

[14]  J. Krebs,et al.  Arms races between and within species , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[15]  Catherine E. Lovelock,et al.  Differential effects of tropical arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inocula on root colonization and tree seedling growth: implications for tropical forest diversity , 2000 .

[16]  Matthew A. Parker,et al.  Symbiotic specialization and the potential for genotypic coexistence in a plant-bacterial mutualism , 1996, Oecologia.

[17]  K. Christensen,et al.  Tangled nature: a model of evolutionary ecology. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  Nils Aall Barricelli,et al.  Numerical testing of evolution theories , 1963 .

[19]  John R. Koza,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. , 1995, Artificial Life.

[20]  John S. McCaskill,et al.  Artificial Life VII: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Artificial Life , 2000 .

[21]  Paul Marrow,et al.  The coevolution of predator—prey interactions : ESSS and Red Queen dynamics , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Christoph Adami,et al.  Artificial life VI : proceedings of the sixth International Conference on Artificial Life , 1998 .

[23]  M. Conrad,et al.  Evolution experiments with an artificial ecosystem. , 1970, Journal of theoretical biology.

[24]  Charles E. Taylor,et al.  Artificial Life II , 1991 .

[25]  L. V. Valen,et al.  A new evolutionary law , 1973 .

[26]  Thomas S. Ray,et al.  An Approach to the Synthesis of Life , 1991 .

[27]  P. Young,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[28]  G. Booth,et al.  Modelling food web complexity: The consequences of individual-based, spatially explicit behavioural ecology on trophic interactions , 1997, Evolutionary Ecology.