Brain white matter lesion classification in multiple sclerosis subjects for the prognosis of future disability

This study investigates the application of classification methods for the prognosis of future disability on MRIdetectable brain white matter lesions in subjects diagnosed with clinical isolated syndrome (CIS) of multiple sclerosis (MS). In order to achieve these we had collected MS lesions from 38 subjects, manually segmented by an experienced MS neurologist, on transverse T2-weighted images obtained from serial brain MR imaging scans. The patients have been divided into two groups, those belonging to patients with EDSS 2 and those belonging to patients with EDSS > 2 (expanded disability status scale (EDSS)) that was measured at 24 months after the onset of the disease). Several image texture analysis features were extracted from the plaques. Using the Mann-Whitey rank sum test at p < 0.05 we had identified the features that could give acceptable significant difference. Based on these features three different classification models were investigated for predicting a subject’s disability score (two class models, EDSS 2 and EDSS > 2). These models were based on the Support Vector Machines (SVM), the Probabilistic Neural Networks (PNN), and the decision trees algorithm (C4.5). The highest percentage of correct classification’s score achieved was 69% when using the SVM classifier. The findings of this study provide evidence that texture features of MRI-detectable brain white matter lesions may have an additional potential role in the clinical evaluation of MR images in MS.

[1]  C. Pattichis,et al.  Quantitative analysis of brain white matter lesions in multiple sclerosis subjects , 2009, 2009 9th International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine.

[2]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[3]  Donald F. Specht,et al.  Probabilistic neural networks , 1990, Neural Networks.

[4]  A. Kassner,et al.  Texture Analysis: A Review of Neurologic MR Imaging Applications , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[5]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  Neural network PC tools: a practical guide , 1990 .

[6]  J Chambron,et al.  Distinct patterns of active and non-active plaques using texture analysis on brain NMR images in multiple sclerosis patients: preliminary results. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[7]  Rohit Bakshi,et al.  MRI in multiple sclerosis: current status and future prospects , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[8]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Feature Reduction and Texture Classification in MRI-Texture Analysis of Multiple Sclerosis , 2007, 2007 IEEE/ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering.

[9]  P. Tofts,et al.  Texture analysis of spinal cord pathology in multiple sclerosis , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Robert King,et al.  Textural features corresponding to textural properties , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[11]  A. J. Thompson,et al.  Multiple sclerosis: assessment of disability and disability scales , 1998, Journal of Neurology.

[12]  C. Schizas,et al.  Quantitative analysis of brain white matter lesions in multiple sclerosis subjects: Preliminary findings , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine.

[13]  Marius E Mayerhoefer,et al.  Are signal intensity and homogeneity useful parameters for distinguishing between benign and malignant soft tissue masses on MR images? Objective evaluation by means of texture analysis. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  H. Eskola,et al.  MRI texture analysis in multiple sclerosis: toward a clinical analysis protocol. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[16]  Marios S. Pattichis,et al.  Multiscale Amplitude-Modulation Frequency-Modulation (AM–FM) Texture Analysis of Multiple Sclerosis in Brain MRI Images , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[17]  Philip D. Wasserman,et al.  Advanced methods in neural computing , 1993, VNR computer library.

[18]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Texture analysis of multiple sclerosis: a comparative study. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[19]  G. Collewet,et al.  Influence of MRI acquisition protocols and image intensity normalization methods on texture classification. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[20]  E Le Rumeur,et al.  MRI texture analysis on texture test objects, normal brain and intracranial tumors. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[21]  อนิรุธ สืบสิงห์,et al.  Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques , 2014 .

[22]  Tong Zhang,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-Based Learning Methods , 2001, AI Mag..

[23]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1987 .

[24]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[25]  A. Compston,et al.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis , 2001, Annals of neurology.

[26]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  A Comparative Study of Texture Measures for Terrain Classification , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[27]  Dominik S. Meier,et al.  Time-series analysis of MRI intensity patterns in multiple sclerosis , 2003, NeuroImage.

[28]  Christos P. Loizou,et al.  Brain White Matter Lesions Classification in Multiple Sclerosis Subjects for the Prognosis of Future Disability , 2011, EANN/AIAI.

[29]  F. Barkhof,et al.  The contribution of magnetic resonance imaging to the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis , 1999, Neurology.