The impact of repetition-induced familiarity on agreement with weak and strong arguments.

Repeated statements are perceived as more valid than novel ones, termed the illusion of truth effect, presumably because repetition imbues the statement with familiarity. In 3 studies, the authors examined the conditions under which and the processes by which familiarity signals from repetition and argument quality signals from processing of message content influenced agreement with persuasive arguments. Participants with low or high motivation to process information were presented persuasive arguments seen once or twice. In all 3 studies, repetition increased the persuasiveness of weak and strong arguments when little processing of message content occurred. Two of the studies used a process dissociation procedure to reveal that both greater controlled processing (which reflected argument content) and the greater automatic influence of familiarity (which reflected repetition) were associated with increased acceptance of strong arguments but that greater controlled processing dissipated the benefits of familiarity for agreement with weak arguments.

[1]  Christian Unkelbach,et al.  Reversing the truth effect: learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Mário B. Ferreira,et al.  Automatic and controlled components of judgment and decision making. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  R. Petty,et al.  The Malleable Meaning of Subjective Ease , 2006, Psychological science.

[4]  D. Balota,et al.  Conceptualizing control in social cognition: how executive functioning modulates the expression of automatic stereotyping. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Denise C. Park,et al.  How warnings about false claims become recommendations , 2005 .

[6]  Heather M. Claypool,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF PERSONAL RELEVANCE AND REPETITION ON PERSUASIVE PROCESSING , 2004 .

[7]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  The Effect of Conceptual and Perceptual Fluency on Brand Evaluation , 2004 .

[8]  Karl Christoph Klauer,et al.  Bearing false witness under pressure: Implicit and explicit components of stereotype-driven memory distortions. , 2003 .

[9]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Diane M. Mackie,et al.  The Feeling of Familiarity as a Regulator of Persuasive Processing , 2001 .

[11]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  Model Comparisons and Model Selections Based on Generalization Criterion Methodology. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[12]  Joseph P. Forgas,et al.  The Message Within : The Role of Subjective Experience In Social Cognition And Behavior , 2000 .

[13]  D. Mackie,et al.  The positive feeling of familiarity: Mood as an information processing regulation mechanism. , 2000 .

[14]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Judgments of Truth , 1999, Consciousness and Cognition.

[15]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. , 1998 .

[16]  Patrick E. Shrout,et al.  Toward a psychometric analysis of violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation , 1997 .

[17]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  In defense of functional independence: Violations of assumptions underlying the process-dissociation procedure? , 1997 .

[18]  Ian Begg,et al.  Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth , 1992 .

[19]  N. Sanders,et al.  Journal of behavioral decision making: "The need for contextual and technical knowledge in judgmental forecasting", 5 (1992) 39-52 , 1992 .

[20]  L. Jacoby.  A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[21]  I. Begg,et al.  Repetition and the ring of truth: Biasing comments. , 1991 .

[22]  R. Bornstein.  Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[23]  Catherine Hackett,et al.  The generality of the relation between familiarity and judged validity. , 1989 .

[24]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of message Repetition on Argument Processing, Recall, and Persuasion , 1989 .

[25]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[26]  Ian Begg,et al.  On believing what we remember. , 1985 .

[27]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Personal involvement as a determinant of argument based persuasion , 1981 .

[28]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[29]  Frederick T. Bacon.  Credibility of Repeated Statements: Memory for Trivia. , 1979 .

[30]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Frequency and the Conference of Referential Validity. , 1977 .

[31]  M. Sherif,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1946, Psychological review.

[32]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[33]  Lewis Carroll,et al.  The Hunting of the Snark: An Agony in Eight Fits , 1876 .