Designedly Incomplete Utterances: A Pedagogical Practice for Eliciting Knowledge Displays in Error Correction Sequences

This article uses a conversation analytic framework to analyze a practice used by teachers in 1-on-1, second-language writing conferences when eliciting self-correction of students' written language errors. This type of turn, used to elicit a knowledge display from the student, is not a syntactic question or even a complete turn constructional unit. It is designed to be incomplete; hence the name designedly incomplete utterance (DIU). The teachers use DIUs made up of the students' own words to begin turns that they are prompting the students to complete. Several types of DIU are discussed, showing how their turn design is related to the action they are being used to do. DIUs are then compared to similar practices found in ordinary conversation (i.e., word searches and anticipatory completions), showing how DIUs are adaptations of these practices to accomplish specialized institutional tasks.

[1]  C. Goodwin.  Gestures as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation , 1986 .

[2]  E. Schegloff.  Interaction and grammar: Turn organization: one intersection of grammar and interaction , 1996 .

[3]  Craig Chaudron,et al.  Second Language Classrooms. Research on Teaching and Learning. , 1988 .

[4]  Paul Drew,et al.  Analyzing talk at work: an introduction , 1992 .

[5]  Ilona Leki,et al.  Second Language Writing: Coaching from the margins: issues in written response , 1990 .

[6]  Gene H. Lerner.  Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities , 1995 .

[7]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word , 1986 .

[8]  Ilona Leki.  Understanding ESL writers : a guide for teachers , 1992 .

[9]  K. Bailey,et al.  Focus on the language classroom : an introduction to classroom research for language teachers , 1993 .

[10]  Michelle G. Paterno.  Responding to Student Writing , 2002 .

[11]  Glynda Hull,et al.  The Editing Process in Writing: A Performance Study of More Skilled and Less Skilled College Writers , 1987, Research in the Teaching of English.

[12]  Gene H. Lerner.  On the syntax of sentences-in-progress , 1991, Language in Society.

[13]  Gene H. Lerner.  Notes on overlap management in conversation: The case of delayed completion , 1989 .

[14]  Colette Daiute,et al.  Psycholinguistic Foundations of the Writing Process. , 1981 .

[15]  A. Cohen,et al.  Second Language Writing: Feedback on compositions: teacher and student verbal reports , 1990 .

[16]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[17]  Harriet D. Semke.  Effects of the Red Pen , 1984 .

[18]  Steven J. Ross,et al.  SALIENCE OF FEEDBACK ON ERROR AND ITS EFFECT ON EFL WRITING QUALITY , 1986 .

[19]  S. Levinson.  Activity types and language , 1979, Linguistics.

[20]  E. Goffman,et al.  Forms of talk , 1982 .

[21]  W. Chafe.  Cognitive constraints on information flow , 1984 .

[22]  E. Schegloff,et al.  The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation , 1977 .

[23]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  The Relevance of Repair to Syntax-for-Conversation in Discourse and Syntax. , 1979 .

[24]  H. Mehan.  ‘What time is it, Denise?”: Asking known information questions in classroom discourse , 1979 .

[25]  Karen Ann Watson-Gegeo,et al.  Interactions and authority: The dominant interpretive framework in writing conferences , 1989 .

[26]  Gene H. Lerner.  Interaction and grammar: On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker , 1996 .

[27]  Mina Shaughnessy Scholar.  Errors and expectations : a guide for the teacher of basic writing , 1977 .

[28]  Marjorie Harness Goodwin.  Searching for a Word as an Interactive Activity , 1983 .

[29]  I Hutchby,et al.  Interaction and grammar. , 1998 .

[30]  Ann K. Fathman,et al.  Second Language Writing: Teacher response to student writing: focus on form versus content , 1990 .

[31]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[32]  J. Atkinson,et al.  A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement , 1985 .

[33]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other‐initiated repair , 1997 .

[34]  R. Mackay.  Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology , 1987 .

[35]  Cecilia E. Ford,et al.  Interaction and grammar: Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns , 1996 .