Managing Heterogeneous Access Networks Coordinated policy based decision engines for mobility management

Next generation networks will consist of heterogeneous access networks and will provide a variety of services. In such an environment the question of the assignment of terminals to access networks and mobility management becomes a challenging problem. This is especially true when one takes the user goals and network operator goals into account. Users would like to be connected to their services over the best available access technology, where the users should be able to define what "best" means for themselves, in other terms users want to be Always-Best-Connected (ABC). The network operator has to satisfy ABC property for users who are essentially competing for resources and has to maintain the best possible utility out of its investment. This can be coined as Always-Best-Managed (ABM) networks. Taking into account that what best means for different users will be different in practice that it will not be possible to fulfill the requirements of each of the users simultaneously, and that the network itself is dynamic in nature, one can imagine the difficulty of achieving ABC and ABM continuously and simultaneously. In this paper we introduce a new approach to policy based mobility management based on two coordinated decision engines, one residing in the terminal and one in the network. We describe our architecture enabling network controlled policy based mobility management and discuss first results observed with our prototype implementation of this architecture.

[1]  James Kempf,et al.  Problem Statement for Network-Based Localized Mobility Management (NETLMM) , 2007, RFC.

[2]  Sahin Albayrak,et al.  JADL - An Agent Description Language for Smart Agents , 2006, DALT.

[3]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobility support in IPv6 , 1996, MobiCom '96.

[4]  Volker Jungnickel,et al.  MIMO-OFDM for a cellular deployment — Concepts, real-time implementation and measurements towards 3GPP-LTE , 2007, 2007 15th European Signal Processing Conference.

[5]  Dinesh C. Verma,et al.  Simplifying network administration using policy-based management , 2002, IEEE Netw..

[6]  Robert Hsieh Pro-collaborative mobile systems in next generation IP networks , 2004 .

[7]  Frank Stajano,et al.  Autonomic system for mobility support in 4G networks , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[8]  Chetan Sharma,et al.  Always Best Connected , 2008 .

[9]  Roch Guérin,et al.  A Framework for Policy-based Admission Control , 2000, RFC.

[10]  Cornel Pampu,et al.  Policy based Mobile IP Handoff Decision (Polimand) using Generic Link Layer Information , 2003, MWCN.

[11]  Alex Galis,et al.  A Policy Based Context-aware Service for Next Generation Networks , 2003 .

[12]  Joachim Sachs,et al.  A generic link layer for future generation wireless networking , 2003, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2003. ICC '03..

[13]  Aruna Seneviratne,et al.  S-MIP: a seamless handoff architecture for mobile IP , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[14]  Morris Sloman,et al.  Policy driven management for distributed systems , 1994, Journal of Network and Systems Management.

[15]  Kun Yang,et al.  Policy-Driven Mobile Agents for Context-Aware Service in Next Generation Networks , 2003, MATA.

[16]  Dinesh C. Verma,et al.  A policy framework for integrated and differentiated services in the Internet , 1999, IEEE Netw..