Peer Effects in Academic Cheating

Using self-reported academic cheating from the classes of 1959 through 2002 at the three major United States military service academies (Air Force, Army, and Navy), we measure how peer cheating influences individual cheating behavior. We find higher levels of peer cheating result in a substantially increased probability that an individual will cheat. One additional college student who cheated in high school drives approximately 0.33 to 0.47 additional college students to cheat. One additional college cheater drives approximately 0.61 to 0.75 additional college students to cheat. These results imply, in equilibrium, the social multiplier for academic cheating is approximately three.

[1]  B. Carruthers,et al.  Social Economics: Market Behavior in a Social Environment , 2010 .

[2]  David S. Lyle.  Estimating and Interpreting Peer and Role Model Effects from Randomly Assigned Social Groups at West Point , 2007, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[3]  Gigi Foster.  It's not your peers, and it's not your friends: Some progress toward understanding the educational peer effect mechanism , 2006 .

[4]  Todd R. Stinebrickner,et al.  What can be learned about peer effects using college roommates? Evidence from new survey data and students from disadvantaged backgrounds , 2006 .

[5]  David N. Figlio.  Boys Named Sue: Disruptive Children and Their Peers , 2005, Education Finance and Policy.

[6]  Lars Lefgren.  Educational peer effects and the Chicago public schools , 2004 .

[7]  M. Kremer,et al.  Peer Effects and Alcohol Use Among College Students , 2003 .

[8]  Mark A. Hager,et al.  Response Rates for Mail Surveys of Nonprofit Organizations: A Review and Empirical Test , 2003 .

[9]  Linda Klebe Trevino,et al.  Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research , 2001 .

[10]  Michael A. Boozer,et al.  Inside the 'Black Box' of Project Star: Estimation of Peer Effects Using Experimental Data , 2001 .

[11]  Kenneth D. Butterfield,et al.  Dishonesty in Academic Environments , 2001 .

[12]  D. Zimmerman.  Peer Effects in Academic Outcomes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[13]  E. Hudes,et al.  Estimating and correcting for response bias in self-reported HIV risk behavior. , 1999 .

[14]  S. Presser,et al.  Data collection mode and social desirability bias in self-reported religious attendance : Church attendance in the United States , 1998 .

[15]  S. Raphael,et al.  School-Based Peer Effects and Juvenile Behavior , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[16]  Linda Klebe Trevino,et al.  Individual and Contextual Influences on Academic Dishonesty: A Multicampus Investigation , 1997 .

[17]  E. Rasmusen.  Stigma and Self-Fulfilling Expectations of Criminality , 1996, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[18]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Learning by Doing and Learning from Others: Human Capital and Technical Change in Agriculture , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  Diane C. Thompson,et al.  The validity of self-reported smoking: a review and meta-analysis. , 1994, American journal of public health.

[20]  A. Case,et al.  Diffusion as a Learning Process: Evidence from HYV Cotton , 1994 .

[21]  C. Kirk Hadaway,et al.  What the polls don't show: A closer look at U.S. church attendance. , 1993 .

[22]  L. Treviño,et al.  Academic Dishonesty: Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences , 1993 .

[23]  C. Manski.  Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem , 1993 .

[24]  M. Traugott,et al.  LITTLE WHITE LIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCE MODELS CORRELATED RESPONSE ERRORS IN A PANEL STUDY OF VOTING , 1992 .

[25]  R. Sah.  Social Osmosis and Patterns of Crime , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  Lawrence F. Katz,et al.  The Company You Keep: The Effects of Family and Neighborhood on Disadvantaged Youths , 1991 .

[27]  H. Fujita,et al.  AI research , 1988 .

[28]  O. Svenson.  ARE WE ALL LESS RISKY AND MORE SKILLFUL THAN OUR FELLOW DRIVERS , 1981 .

[29]  W. Fuller,et al.  Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root , 1979 .

[30]  M. Spence.  Job Market Signaling , 1973 .

[31]  S. Levy.  Colleges and Careers. , 1973 .

[32]  G. Becker,et al.  Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis , 1962, Journal of Political Economy.

[33]  R. Crutchfield.  Conformity and character. , 1955 .

[34]  Hugh J. Parry,et al.  Validity of Responses to Survey Questions , 1950 .

[35]  D. Cressey,et al.  Principles of Criminology. , 1947 .

[36]  Bryan S. Graham,et al.  Identifying Social Interactions through Excess Variance Contrasts , 2005 .

[37]  Thomas J. Nechyba,et al.  Peer Effects in North Carolina Public Schools , 2004 .

[38]  Julian R. Bettsa.  Peer Groups and Academic Achievement: Panel Evidence from Administrative Data , 2004 .

[39]  P. Bayer,et al.  Building Criminal Capital behind Bars : Peer Effects in Juvenile Corrections , 2004 .

[40]  Suzanne Campbell.  Taking Race out of the Equation: Transracial Adoption in 2000 , 2000 .

[41]  Denison Gatehouse,et al.  PEER EFFECTS IN ACADEMIC OUTCOMES: Evidence from a Natural Experiment , 1999 .

[42]  W. J. Bowers,et al.  The College Fraternity as an Opportunity Structure for Meeting Academic Demands , 1970 .

[43]  Lester C. Thurow,et al.  INVESTMENT IN HUMAN CAPITAL , 2016 .

[44]  Lones Smith,et al.  Street Crime and Street Culture , 2004 .