Impairment–oriented training and adaptive motor cortex reorganisation after stroke: a fTMS study

AbstractIn a sample of 28 subacute anterior circulation ischemic stroke patients with severe arm paresis, reduced motor cortex excitability (increased motor thresholds, reduced MEP amplitudes, reduced number of active points) and a reduced conduction velocity in the corticospinal system were found in the affected hemisphere. At the same time motor cortex topology for the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) representation was comparable for the affected and non–affected hemisphere. Considerable arm motor recovery (Fugl–Meyer test) was observed when assessed four weeks later after a period of rehabilitation intervention. Motor cortex excitability and conduction velocity in the corticospinal system improved in the affected hemisphere. In addition, APB representation showed a medial shift in patients with such a representation at pre test (n = 14). Multiple stepwise regression indicated that of all transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) parameters only the medial shift of the motor cortex map predicted motor recovery. Assessing the effect of training time (nonintensified vs. intensified therapy) and type of arm training (Bobath approach vs. Arm BASIS training) with a randomised controlled design revealed that the impairment–oriented Arm BASIS training improved motor control more than the control conditions. In addition, patients of the group receiving the Arm BASIS training with an APB representation at pre test showed a medial shift of the motor cortex map and improved conduction times. In conclusion, changes in motor cortex topology were likely to be relevant for motor recovery and might have been induced by the impairment–oriented training.

[1]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Correlation between motor improvements and altered fMRI activity after rehabilitative therapy. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  B. Rosen,et al.  A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. , 1997, Stroke.

[3]  S. Cramer,et al.  Motor Cortex Organization After Stroke Is Related to Side of Stroke and Level of Recovery , 2003, Stroke.

[4]  H. Freund,et al.  The role of diaschisis in stroke recovery. , 1999, Stroke.

[5]  R. Seitz,et al.  Learning of Sequential Finger Movements in Man: A Combined Kinematic and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Study , 1992, The European journal of neuroscience.

[6]  T. Platz,et al.  Impairment-oriented training (IOT)--scientific concept and evidence-based treatment strategies. , 2004, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[7]  M. Hallett,et al.  Contribution of the ipsilateral motor cortex to recovery after chronic stroke , 2003, Annals of neurology.

[8]  T. Platz,et al.  Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[9]  A. Arsenault,et al.  Motor function and activities of daily living assessments: a study of three tests for persons with hemiplegia. , 1991, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[10]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  T. Olsen,et al.  Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  B. Ashworth.  PRELIMINARY TRIAL OF CARISOPRODOL IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS. , 1964, The Practitioner.

[13]  H. Jasper.  Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography , 1958 .

[14]  Treatment protocols. , 1990, The New Zealand medical journal.

[15]  K. Mauritz,et al.  Testing a motor performance series and a kinematic motion analysis as measures of performance in high-functioning stroke patients: reliability, validity, and responsiveness to therapeutic intervention. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. , 1997, Stroke.

[17]  R Langton-Hewer,et al.  The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. , 1983, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[18]  Sung Ho Jang,et al.  Cortical reorganization induced by task-oriented training in chronic hemiplegic stroke patients , 2003, Neuroreport.

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional reorganization of the brain in recovery from striatocapsular infarction in man , 1992, Annals of neurology.

[20]  Mary Elizabeth Parker,et al.  Recovery of Upper Extremity Function in Stroke Patients: The Copenhagen Stroke Study , 1995 .

[21]  K. Mauritz,et al.  Motor learning after recovery from hemiparesis , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  RaimondoTraversa,et al.  Mapping of Motor Cortical Reorganization After Stroke , 1997 .

[23]  M. Jüptner,et al.  Arm Training Induced Brain Plasticity in Stroke Studied with Serial Positron Emission Tomography , 2001, NeuroImage.

[24]  E. M. Rouiller,et al.  Mechanisms of recovery of dexterity following unilateral lesion of the sensorimotor cortex in adult monkeys , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  K. Mauritz,et al.  Human Motor Planning, Motor Programming, and Use of New Task‐relevant Information with Different Apraxic Syndromes , 1995, The European journal of neuroscience.

[26]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology , 2003, The Lancet Neurology.

[27]  W. Weerdt.  Measuring recovery of arm-hand function in stroke patients: A comparison of the Brunnstrom-Fugl-Meyer test and the Action Research Arm test , 1985 .

[28]  P. Stratford,et al.  Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. , 1993, Physical therapy.

[29]  M. Zwarts,et al.  Analysis of Recovery Processes After Stroke by Means of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2003, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[30]  B. Johansson,et al.  Neuronal Plasticity and Dendritic Spines: Effect of Environmental Enrichment on Intact and Postischemic Rat Brain , 2002, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[31]  Yue Cao,et al.  Pilot study of functional MRI to assess cerebral activation of motor function after poststroke hemiparesis. , 1998, Stroke.

[32]  K H Mauritz,et al.  Arm ability training for stroke and traumatic brain injury patients with mild arm paresis: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[33]  Gary W Thickbroom,et al.  Long-term changes in motor cortical organisation after recovery from subcortical stroke 1 1 Published on the World Wide Web on 1 December 2000. , 2001, Brain Research.

[34]  T. Platz,et al.  Reduced skilfulness of arm motor behaviour among motor stroke patients with good clinical recovery: does it indicate reduced automaticity? Can it be improved by unilateral or bilateral training? A kinematic motion analysis study , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  P M Matthews,et al.  Functional brain reorganization for hand movement in patients with multiple sclerosis: defining distinct effects of injury and disability. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[37]  J. Brion,et al.  Evidence of cortical reorganization in hemiparetic patients. , 1989, Stroke.

[38]  J. Liepert,et al.  Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. , 2000, Stroke.

[39]  J. Grotta,et al.  Graded neurologic scale for use in acute hemispheric stroke treatment protocols. , 1987, Stroke.

[40]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials , 2001, Clinical rehabilitation.

[41]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: A study with positron emission tomography , 1991, Annals of neurology.

[42]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[43]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Motor cortex activation is preserved in patients with chronic hemiplegic stroke , 2002, Annals of neurology.

[44]  R N Lemon,et al.  Contralateral and ipsilateral EMG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation during recovery of arm and hand function after stroke. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[45]  J. Bamford,et al.  Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction , 1991, The Lancet.