Design of Disturbance Extended State Observer (D-ESO)-Based Constrained Full-State Model Predictive Controller for the Integrated Turbo-Shaft Engine/Rotor System

In the modern helicopter design and development process, constrained full-state control technology for turbo-shaft engine/rotor systems has always been a research hotspot in academia and industry. However, relevant references have pointed out that the traditional design method with an overly complex structure (Min-Max structure and schedule-based transient controller, i.e., M-M-STC) may not be able to meet the protection requirements of engine control systems under certain circumstances and can be too conservative under other conditions. In order to address the engine limit protection problem more efficiently, a constrained full-state model predictive controller (MPC) has been designed in this paper by incorporating a linear parameter varying (LPV) predictive model. Meanwhile, disturbance extended state observer (D-ESO) (which a sufficient convergence condition is deduced for) has also been proposed as the compensator of the LPV model to alleviate the MPC model mismatch problem. Finally, we run a group of comparison simulations with the traditional M-M-STC method to verify the effectiveness of this controller by taking compressor surge prevention problems as a case study, and the results indicate the validity of the proposed method.

[1]  Jay H. Lee,et al.  Model predictive control: past, present and future , 1999 .

[2]  David W. Clarke,et al.  Generalized predictive control - Part I. The basic algorithm , 1987, Autom..

[3]  Mayuresh V. Kothare,et al.  Robust output feedback model predictive control using off-line linear matrix inequalities , 2002 .

[4]  Alireza Behbahani,et al.  Physics-Based Dynamic Modeling of a Turboshaft Engine Driving a Variable Pitch Propeller , 2016 .

[5]  Volker Gümmer,et al.  The potential of helicopter turboshaft engines incorporating highly effective recuperators under various flight conditions , 2019 .

[6]  Miroslav Krstic,et al.  Multivariable adaptive control of instabilities arising in jet engines , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, 2003..

[7]  Bao-Zhu Guo,et al.  On Convergence of Nonlinear Active Disturbance Rejection Control for SISO Nonlinear Systems , 2016 .

[8]  Zhong-Ping Jiang,et al.  Linear output feedback with dynamic high gain for nonlinear systems , 2004, Syst. Control. Lett..

[9]  Hanz Richter,et al.  A multi-regulator sliding mode control strategy for output-constrained systems , 2011, Autom..

[10]  J. O'Reilly,et al.  Model predictive control of nonlinear systems: computational burden and stability , 2000 .

[11]  Jonathan S. Litt,et al.  Multiplexed Predictive Control of a Large Commercial Turbofan Engine , 2008 .

[12]  Ernesto Benini,et al.  Preliminary Study on a Wide-Speed-Range Helicopter Rotor/Turboshaft System , 2012 .

[13]  Xiaofeng Liu,et al.  Stability Analysis for GE T700 Turboshaft Distributed Engine Control Systems , 2017, IEEE Access.

[14]  Yuxin Su,et al.  Disturbance-rejection high-precision motion control of a Stewart platform , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[15]  B. Lehtinen,et al.  The role of modern control theory in the design of controls for aircraft turbine engines , 1982 .

[16]  Zhiqiang Gao,et al.  Active disturbance rejection control for MEMS gyroscopes , 2008, 2008 American Control Conference.

[17]  M. Soroush,et al.  Model Predictive Control Tuning Methods: A Review , 2010 .