Sensitivity of Fit Indexes to Misspecified Structural or Measurement Model Components: Rationale of Two-Index Strategy Revisited

In previous research (Hu & Bentler, 1998, 1999), 2 conclusions were drawn: standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) was the most sensitive to misspecified factor covariances, and a group of other fit indexes were most sensitive to misspecified factor loadings. Based on these findings, a 2-index strategy-that is, SRMR coupled with another index-was proposed in model fit assessment to detect potential misspecification in both the structural and measurement model parameters. Based on our reasoning and empirical work presented in this article, we conclude that SRMR is not necessarily most sensitive to misspecified factor covariances (structural model misspecification), the group of indexes (TLI, BL89, RNI, CFI, Gamma hat, Mc, or RMSEA) are not necessarily more sensitive to misspecified factor loadings (measurement model misspecification), and the rationale for the 2-index presentation strategy appears to have questionable validity.

[1]  Kern W. Dickman,et al.  Sample and population score matrices and sample correlation matrices from an arbitrary population correlation matrix , 1962 .

[2]  K. Bollen.  Sample size and bentler and Bonett's nonnormed fit index , 1986 .

[3]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[4]  S. Mulaik,et al.  EVALUATION OF GOODNESS-OF-FIT INDICES FOR STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS , 1989 .

[5]  James C. Anderson,et al.  Monte Carlo Evaluations of Goodness of Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models , 1992 .

[6]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[7]  H. Marsh,et al.  An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical properties. , 1996 .

[8]  P. Bentler,et al.  Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification , 1998 .

[9]  Xitao Fan,et al.  Effects of Potential Confounding Factors on Fit Indices and Parameter Estimates for True and Misspecified SEM Models , 1998 .

[10]  B. Thompson,et al.  EFFECTS OF SAMPLE SIZE, ESTIMATION METHODS, AND MODEL SPECIFICATION ON STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING FIT INDEXES , 1999 .

[11]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[12]  Book Review of A First Course in Structural Equation Modeling , 2001 .

[13]  Score Comparability of a State Reading Assessment Across Selected Groups of Students With Disabilities , 2001 .

[14]  Book Review of A First Course in Structural Equation Modeling, by Tenko Raykov and George A. Marcoulides , 2001 .

[15]  James Algina,et al.  Comparison of Methods for Estimating and Testing Latent Variable Interactions , 2002 .

[16]  Christine DiStefano,et al.  The Impact of Categorization With Confirmatory Factor Analysis , 2002 .

[17]  D. Glaser.  Book review of Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions, by David Kaplan , 2002 .

[18]  Willem E. Saris,et al.  Fit of Different Models for Multitrait-Multimethod Experiments , 2002 .

[19]  H. Marsh,et al.  In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) Findings , 2004 .