Adaptive Network-Device Cooperative Diversity for Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Wireless Control

Wireless motion control in the next generation of industrial control systems aims to provide the sensor/actuator devices on a factory floor with continuous closed-loop control updates from the controller entity, requiring communications with extremely low latency in the order of sub-ms and "cablelike" high reliability. This paper introduces a wireless communication protocol that uses channel state information (CSI) and cooperative communication among the devices to best utilize the radio resources and provide an ultra-reliable radio access. We propose to use CSI to identify devices with strong and weak channel conditions. We show that strong devices in the network are best to be served in a single-hop transmission with transmission rate adapted to their instantaneous channel conditions. Meanwhile, the remainder of time-frequency resources is used to serve the devices with weak channel condition, using a two-hop transmission with cooperative relaying. We formulate the optimization problem of partitioning time budget between the two groups and associating devices to each group. Numerical solution to the optimization problem and simulation results are provided. Thanks to combining multi-user diversity gain together with cooperative relaying, the proposed solution provides orders of magnitude improvement in system reliability, resulting in more than 10 dB signal to noise ratio (SNR) gain at 10−5 system outage probability point, with respect to state-of-the-art protocols.

[1]  Harish Viswanathan,et al.  Variable-rate ultra-reliable and low-latency communication for industrial automation , 2018, 2018 52nd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS).

[2]  Ke Wang Helmersson,et al.  Deployment Strategies for Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communication in Factory Automation , 2015, 2015 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[3]  Paul J. M. Havinga,et al.  Wireless Industrial Monitoring and Control Networks: The Journey So Far and the Road Ahead , 2012, J. Sens. Actuator Networks.

[4]  Gerhard P Hancke,et al.  Introduction to Industrial Control Networks , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[5]  Babak Hassibi,et al.  How much training is needed in multiple-antenna wireless links? , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[6]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Statistical channel impulse response models for factory and open plan building radio communicate system design , 1991, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[7]  Lei Zhao,et al.  Diversity and Multiplexing Tradeoff in General Fading Channels , 2007, 2006 40th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[8]  J. Nicholas Laneman Limiting analysis of outage probabilities for diversity schemes in fading channels , 2003, GLOBECOM '03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489).

[9]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  Capacity and power allocation for fading MIMO channels with channel estimation error , 2006, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[10]  Gianluca Cena,et al.  Hybrid wired/wireless networks for real-time communications , 2008, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.

[11]  Catherine A. Remley,et al.  Industrial Wireless Systems: Radio Propagation Measurements , 2017 .

[12]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Outage of Periodic Downlink Wireless Networks With Hard Deadlines , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[13]  Anant Sahai,et al.  Cooperative communication for high-reliability low-latency wireless control , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[14]  Anant Sahai,et al.  Design of a low-latency, high-reliability wireless communication system for control applications , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[15]  Harish Viswanathan,et al.  Analysis of Feedback Error in Automatic Repeat reQuest , 2017, ArXiv.

[16]  Stephen V. Hanly,et al.  Base Station Cooperation on the Downlink: Large System Analysis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.