Identifying safe cultivars of invasive plants: six questions for risk assessment, management, and communication

The regulation of biological invasions is often focussed at the species level. However, the risks posed by infraand inter-specific entities can be significantly different from the risks posed by the corresponding species, to the extent that they should be regulated and managed differently. In particular, many ornamental plants have been the subject of long-term breeding and selection programmes, with an increasing focus on trying to develop cultivars and hybrids that are less invasive. In this paper, we frame the problem of determining the risk of invasion posed by cultivars or hybrids as a set of six questions that map on to the key components of a risk analysis, viz., risk identification, risk assessment, risk management, and risk communication. 1) Has an infraor inter-specific entity been proposed as “safe to use” despite at least one of the corresponding species being a harmful invasive? 2) What are the trait differences between the proposed safe alternative and its corresponding invasive species? 3) Do the differences in traits translate into a difference in invasion risk that is significant for regulation? 4) Are the differences spatially and temporally stable? 5) Can the entities be distinguished from each other in practice? 6) What are the appropriate ways to communicate the risks and what can be done to manage them? For each question, we use examples to illustrate how they might be addressed focussing on plant cultivars that are purported to be safe due to sterility. We review the biological basis of sterility, methods used to generate sterile cultivars, and the methods available to confirm sterility. It is apparent that separating invasive genetic entities from less invasive, Copyright Arunava Datta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. NeoBiota 62: 81–97 (2020) doi: 10.3897/neobiota.62.51635 http://neobiota.pensoft.net DISCUSSION PAPER Advancing research on alien species and biological invasions A peer-reviewed open-access journal

[1]  Matthew V. Talluto,et al.  The changing role of ornamental horticulture in alien plant invasions , 2018, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[2]  H. Štorchová.  The Role of Non-Coding RNAs in Cytoplasmic Male Sterility in Flowering Plants , 2017, International journal of molecular sciences.

[3]  Günther Klonner,et al.  Will climate change increase hybridization risk between potential plant invaders and their congeners in Europe? , 2017, Diversity & distributions.

[4]  R. Freyre.  Breeding for sterility in invasive ornamental plants. , 2016 .

[5]  Lauren D. Quinn,et al.  Weed Risk Assessments Are an Effective Component of Invasion Risk Management , 2016, Invasive Plant Science and Management.

[6]  N. Gotelli,et al.  Climate change, genetic markers and species distribution modelling , 2015 .

[7]  R. Horn,et al.  Mitochondrion role in molecular basis of cytoplasmic male sterility. , 2014, Mitochondrion.

[8]  G. Knox,et al.  BREEDING RUELLIA AND TRIALING FOR STERILITY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA , 2014 .

[9]  R. D. Zenni,et al.  Adaptive evolution and phenotypic plasticity during naturalization and spread of invasive species: implications for tree invasion biology , 2014, Biological Invasions.

[10]  I. Alsaadawi,et al.  Combining effect of allelopathic Sorghum bicolor L. (Moench) cultivars with planting densities on companion weeds , 2013 .

[11]  G. Knox,et al.  Fruitless Ruellia simplex R10-102 ('Mayan Purple') and R10-108 , 2012 .

[12]  M. Brand,et al.  Fecundity of Japanese Barberry (Berberis thunbergii) Cultivars and Their Ability to Invade a Deciduous Woodland , 2012, Invasive Plant Science and Management.

[13]  I. Alsaadawi,et al.  Differential allelopathic potential of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genotypes on weeds and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crop , 2012 .

[14]  K. Vining,et al.  Genetic Methods for Mitigating Invasiveness of Woody Ornamental Plants: Research Needs and Opportunities , 2012 .

[15]  T. Knight,et al.  Will the use of Less Fecund Cultivars Reduce the Invasiveness of Perennial Plants? , 2011 .

[16]  D. Richardson,et al.  Predicting the subspecific identity of invasive species using distribution models: Acacia saligna as an example , 2011 .

[17]  D. Yakandawala,et al.  Hybridization between native and invasive alien plants: an overlooked threat to the biodiversity of Sri Lanka , 2011 .

[18]  Hao Yu,et al.  In Vitro Regeneration of Triploid Plants of Euonymus alatus ‘Compactus’ (Burning Bush) from Endosperm Tissues , 2011 .

[19]  S. Geerts.  Assembly and disassembly of bird pollination communities at the Cape of Africa , 2011 .

[20]  M. Brand,et al.  Purple-leaved Japanese Barberry (var. atropurpurea) Genotypes Become Visually Indistinguishable from Greenleaved Genotypes (Berberis thunbergii DC.) at Low Light Levels , 2010 .

[21]  D. Richardson,et al.  Molecular systematics and ecology of invasive Kangaroo Paws in South Africa: management implications for a horticulturally important genus , 2010, Biological Invasions.

[22]  Da‐Yong Zhang,et al.  Genetic uniformity characterizes the invasive spread of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), a clonal aquatic plant , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[23]  R. Wilson,et al.  Identification of Sterile, Noninvasive Cultivars of Japanese Spirea , 2009 .

[24]  J. Gaskin,et al.  Introgression between invasive saltcedars (Tamarix chinensis and T. ramosissima) in the USA , 2009, Biological Invasions.

[25]  T. Culley,et al.  The role of intraspecific hybridization in the evolution of invasiveness: a case study of the ornamental pear tree Pyrus calleryana , 2009, Biological Invasions.

[26]  T. Abe,et al.  Heavy-ion beam-induced sterile mutants of verbena (Verbena×hybrida) with an improved flowering habit , 2008 .

[27]  Shadila Venkatasamy,et al.  Leaky dioecy in Diospyros (Ebenaceae) endemic to the Island of Mauritius , 2007, Plant Ecology.

[28]  A. Soylu,et al.  Morphology and anatomy of pollen grains from male-fertile and male-sterile cultivars of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) , 2007 .

[29]  Sandra B. Wilson,et al.  Evaluating North and South Florida Landscape Performance and Fruiting of Ten Cultivars and a Wild-type Selection of Nandina domestica, a Potentially Invasive Shrub , 2006 .

[30]  M. Brand,et al.  Four Cultivars of Japanese Barberry Demonstrate Differential Reproductive Potential under Landscape Conditions , 2006 .

[31]  D. Hartley,et al.  Matching the origin of an invasive weed for selection of a herbivore haplotype for a biological control programme , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[32]  D. Thompson,et al.  Implications of Invasive Plant Variation for Weed Management1 , 2004 .

[33]  R. Petit.  Biological invasions at the gene level , 2004 .

[34]  Sandra B. Wilson,et al.  Florida Nursery Sales and Economic Impacts of 14 Potentially Invasive Landscape Plant Species , 2004 .

[35]  J. Grosser,et al.  Targeted cybridization in citrus: transfer of Satsuma cytoplasm to seedy cultivars for potential seedlessness , 2004, Plant Cell Reports.

[36]  J. Jun,et al.  An RAPD marker linked to the pollen sterility gene ps in peach (Prunus persica) , 2004 .

[37]  Laurie K. Mecca,et al.  Seed Production and Germination of Eight Cultivars and the Wild Type of Ruellia tweediana: A Potentially Invasive Ornamental , 2003 .

[38]  P. White,et al.  Horticulture as a Pathway of Invasive Plant Introductions in the United States , 2001 .

[39]  K. Schierenbeck,et al.  Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants , 2000 .

[40]  S. Ellner,et al.  SIZE‐SPECIFIC SENSITIVITY: APPLYING A NEW STRUCTURED POPULATION MODEL , 2000 .

[41]  M Rejmánek,et al.  Plant invasions — the role of mutualisms , 2000, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[42]  G. Huxel.  Rapid displacement of native species by invasive species: effects of hybridization , 1999 .

[43]  O. Savolainen,et al.  Why do plants abort so many developing seeds: bad offspring or bad maternal genotypes? , 1999, Evolutionary Ecology.

[44]  D. Luu,et al.  Pollen–Stigma Adhesion in Brassica spp Involves SLG and SLR1 Glycoproteins , 1999, Plant Cell.

[45]  P. Schnable,et al.  The molecular basis of cytoplasmic male sterility and fertility restoration , 1998 .

[46]  C. Daehler.  The taxonomic distribution of invasive angiosperm plants: Ecological insights and comparison to agricultural weeds , 1998 .

[47]  Sarah H. Reichard,et al.  Predicting Invasions of Woody Plants Introduced into North America , 1997, Conservation Biology.

[48]  K. Ganeshaiah,et al.  Factors Affecting Embryo Abortion in Syzygium cuminii (L.) Skeels (Myrtaceae) , 1996, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[49]  K. Ganeshaiah,et al.  Seed and fruit abortion as a process of self organization among developing sinks , 1994 .

[50]  N. Chua,et al.  Flower Development in Petunia. , 1993, The Plant cell.

[51]  D. G. Lloyd,et al.  Self- and Cross-Fertilization in Plants. I. Functional Dimensions , 1992, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[52]  C. I. Davern,et al.  Developmental failure and loss of reproductive capacity in the rare palaeoendemic shrub Dedeckera eurekensis , 1989, Nature.

[53]  H. D. Plessis,et al.  Sterile Lanterna camara: fact or theory , 1987 .

[54]  Jarmila Solárová,et al.  Incompatibility in Angiosperms , 1978, Biologia Plantarum.

[55]  H. G. Baker,et al.  The Evolution of Weeds , 1974 .

[56]  O. Mattsson,et al.  Protein Pellicle of Stigmatic Papillae as a Probable Recognition Site in Incompatibility Reactions , 1974, Nature.

[57]  R. Ornduff.  The Breeding System of Pontederia cordata L. , 1966 .

[58]  S. Kumschick,et al.  A framework to support alien species regulation: the Risk Analysis for Alien Taxa (RAAT) , 2020 .

[59]  A. Nóvoa,et al.  Is spinelessness a stable character in cactus pear cultivars? Implications for invasiveness , 2019, Journal of Arid Environments.

[60]  D. Richardson,et al.  A framework for engaging stakeholders on the management of alien species. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[61]  Z. Deng,et al.  UF-T3 and UF-T4: Two Sterile Lantana camara Cultivars , 2012 .

[62]  G. Knox,et al.  Fruitless Ruellia simplex R 10-102 ( ‘ Mayan Purple ’ ) and R 10-108 ( ‘ Mayan White ’ ) , 2012 .

[63]  R. Noyes.  Apomixis in the Asteraceae: Diamonds in the Rough , 2009 .

[64]  J. Sellmer,et al.  Flower and Seed Production of Norway Maple Cultivars , 2009 .

[65]  S. Bentolila,et al.  The petunia restorer of fertility protein is part of a large mitochondrial complex that interacts with transcripts of the CMS-associated locus. , 2007, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[66]  D. G. Lloyd,et al.  Self-and Cross-Fertilization in Plants , 2007 .

[67]  J. Jong.  Radiation-induced male-sterility in daisy-types of Chrysanthemum morifoliumRam , 2004, Euphytica.

[68]  D. de Nettancourt.  Incompatibility in angiosperms , 1997 .

[69]  J. L. Doust,et al.  Patterns of fruit and seed production. , 1988 .

[70]  J. Heslop-Harrison,et al.  Evaluation of pollen viability by enzymatically induced fluorescence; intracellular hydrolysis of fluorescein diacetate. , 1970, Stain technology.