Temporary vegetation disturbance as an explanation for permanent loss of tidal wetlands

[1] Coastal ecosystems respond to sea level and sediment supply change according to complex, three-way interactions between vegetation, hydrology, and sediment transport. While biogeomorphic feedbacks preserve the morphology of intertidal surfaces covered by marshland, we demonstrate with numerical model and field experimentation that temporary disturbance to vegetation facilitates rapid and widespread degradation. Vertical accretion slows in disturbed areas, allowing localized submergence of the marsh platform, tidal prism enlargement, and permanent channel network expansion. Vegetated portions of an episodically disturbed platform accrete more rapidly than rates of relative sea level rise, giving submerging marshland the appearance of maintaining elevation. This feedback between vegetation disturbance and channel erosion, and its effect on platform accretion, may explain peculiar patterns of wetland loss in Europe and North America.

[1]  Aaron M. Ellison,et al.  Determinants of Pattern in a New England Salt Marsh Plant Community , 1987 .

[2]  M. Kirwan,et al.  A coupled geomorphic and ecological model of tidal marsh evolution , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  W. Hood.  Scaling tidal channel geometry with marsh island area: A tool for habitat restoration, linked to channel formation process , 2007 .

[4]  John B. Anderson,et al.  Researchers focus attention on coastal response to climate change , 2001 .

[5]  A. Kolker,et al.  Anthropogenic and climate-change impacts on salt marshes of Jamaica Bay, New York City , 2002, Wetlands.

[6]  Odette Paramor,et al.  The effects of bioturbation and herbivory by the polychaete Nereis diversicolor on loss of saltmarsh in south‐east England , 2004 .

[7]  H. Williams,et al.  Sedimentary Dynamics of an Eroding Tidal Marsh Derived from Stratigraphic Records of 137Cs Fallout, Fraser Delta, British Columbia, Canada , 1995 .

[8]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  On the drainage density of tidal networks , 2001 .

[9]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  Landscape evolution in tidal embayments: Modeling the interplay of erosion, sedimentation, and vegetation dynamics , 2006 .

[10]  D. Reed.  The response of coastal marshes to sea‐level rise: Survival or submergence? , 1995 .

[11]  D. Haydon,et al.  Alternative stable states in ecology , 2003 .

[12]  D. Wal,et al.  Patterns, rates and possible causes of saltmarsh erosion in the Greater Thames area (UK) , 2004 .

[13]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[14]  R. Delaune,et al.  Sedimentation rates determined by 137Cs dating in a rapidly accreting salt marsh , 1978, Nature.

[15]  M. Bertness,et al.  Drought, Snails, and Large-Scale Die-Off of Southern U.S. Salt Marshes , 2005, Science.

[16]  Michael S. Kearney,et al.  Landsat imagery shows decline of coastal marshes in Chesapeake and Delaware Bays , 2002 .

[17]  P. V. Sundareshwar,et al.  RESPONSES OF COASTAL WETLANDS TO RISING SEA LEVEL , 2002 .

[18]  J. Allen.  Simulation models of salt-marsh morphodynamics: some implications for high-intertidal sediment couplets related to sea-level change , 1997 .