Factors influencing the differential sorption of odorant molecules across the olfactory mucosa

By use of a flow dilution olfactometer, tritium-labeled odorants were presented through the external naris to the bullfrog's intact olfactory sac. After stimulation the animal was frozen in liquid nitrogen. The dorsal surface and eminentia of the olfactory sac were then removed and sawed into sections perpendicular to the long axis of the mucosal surface. Each section was dissolved in a tissue solubilizer and counted in a liquid scintillation system. The amount of radioactivity in each section was used to estimate the number of odorant molecules it sorbed. For tritiated butanol there was a significant decrease in radioactivity from the section containing the external naris to that overhanging the internal naris. The steepness of the gradient was unaffected by a rather large range of stimulus flow rates, volumes, and partial pressures. Only when these parameters were pushed to extreme physical limits did this gradient change significantly. When the stimulus was presented through the internal rather than the external naris, the butanol gradient reversed its direction, decreasing from the internal to external. Unlike butanol, tritiated octane presented through the external naris was rather evenly distributed among the mucosal sections. That is, octane showed no distribution gradient across the mucosa. These results complement previous electrophysiological data that suggested a "chromatographic-like" differential sorption of odorant molecules across the mucosa.

[1]  E. Adrian Sensory discrimination with some recent evidence from the olfactory organ. , 1950, British medical bulletin.

[2]  M. M. Mozell,et al.  Quantitative stimulation of frog olfactory receptors. , 1969, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[3]  D. B. Duncan MULTIPLE RANGE AND MULTIPLE F TESTS , 1955 .

[4]  J. Y. Lettvin,et al.  ODOR SPECIFICITIES OF THE FROG'S OLFACTORY RECEPTORS, , 1963 .

[5]  M. M. Mozell,et al.  Evidence for Sorption as a Mechanism of the Olfactory Analysis of Vapours , 1964, Nature.

[6]  Clyde Young Kramer,et al.  Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications , 1956 .

[7]  E. Adrian,et al.  The basis of sensation; some recent studies of olfaction. , 1954, British medical journal.

[8]  E. D. Adrian,et al.  The Basis of Sensation , 1928, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[9]  M. M. Mozell,et al.  Evidence for a Chromatographic Model of Olfaction , 1970, The Journal of general physiology.

[10]  D. Hornung,et al.  Distribution of butanol molecules along bullfrog olfactory mucosa , 1975, Nature.

[11]  D. F. Mathews,et al.  Response Patterns of Single Neurons in the Tortoise Olfactory Epithelium and Olfactory Bulb , 1972, The Journal of general physiology.

[12]  M. M. Mozell,et al.  The Spatiotemporal Analysis of Odorants at the Level of the Olfactory Receptor Sheet , 1966, The Journal of general physiology.

[13]  M. M. Mozell,et al.  Chromatographic Separation of Odorants by the Nose: Retention Times Measured across in vivo Olfactory Mucosa , 1973, Science.

[14]  R. Moncrieff The sorptive properties of the olfactory membrane , 1955, The Journal of physiology.