Toward Better Formula Lower Bounds: The Composition of a Function and a Universal Relation

One of the major open problems in complexity theory is proving superlogarithmic lower bounds on the depth of circuits (i.e., $\mathbf{P}\not\subseteq\mathbf{NC}^1$). This problem is interesting for two reasons: first, it is tightly related to understanding the power of parallel computation and of small-space computation; second, it is one of the first milestones toward proving superpolynomial circuit lower bounds. Karchmer, Raz, and Wigderson [Comput. Complexity, 5 (1995), pp. 191--204] suggested approaching this problem by proving the following conjecture: given two Boolean functions $f$ and $g$, the depth complexity of the composed function $g\diamond f$ is roughly the sum of the depth complexities of $f$ and $g$. They showed that the validity of this conjecture would imply that $\mathbf{P}\not\subseteq\mathbf{NC}^1$. As a starting point for studying the composition of functions, they introduced a relation called “the universal relation” and suggested studying the composition of universal relations. Thi...

[1]  Andrew Chi-Chih Yao,et al.  Some complexity questions related to distributive computing(Preliminary Report) , 1979, STOC.

[2]  Ran Raz,et al.  Super-logarithmic depth lower bounds via the direct sum in communication complexity , 1995, computational complexity.

[3]  Alexander A. Razborov,et al.  Applications of matrix methods to the theory of lower bounds in computational complexity , 1990, Comb..

[4]  Ran Raz,et al.  Monotone circuits for matching require linear depth , 1990, STOC '90.

[5]  N. Alon,et al.  Graph Products, Fourier Analysis and Spectral Techniques , 2004 .

[6]  Xi Chen,et al.  How to Compress Interactive Communication , 2013, SIAM J. Comput..

[7]  Zoltán Füredi,et al.  The Erdös-Ko-Rado Theorem for Integer Sequences , 1980, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[8]  Avi Wigderson,et al.  Monotone circuits for connectivity require super-logarithmic depth , 1990, STOC '88.

[9]  Alexander A. Razborov,et al.  Natural Proofs , 2007 .

[10]  Eyal Kushilevitz,et al.  Fractional covers and communication complexity , 1992, [1992] Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Structure in Complexity Theory Conference.

[11]  Richard P. Brent,et al.  The Parallel Evaluation of General Arithmetic Expressions , 1974, JACM.

[12]  Johan Håstad The Shrinkage Exponent of de Morgan Formulas is 2 , 1998, SIAM J. Comput..

[13]  Samuel R. Buss,et al.  Size-Depth Tradeoffs for Boolean Fomulae , 1994, Inf. Process. Lett..

[14]  Uri Zwick,et al.  Shrinkage of de Morgan formulae under restriction , 1991, [1991] Proceedings 32nd Annual Symposium of Foundations of Computer Science.

[15]  Avi Wigderson,et al.  Composition of the Universal Relation , 1990, Advances In Computational Complexity Theory.

[16]  Noam Nisan,et al.  The Effect of Random Restrictions on Formula Size , 1993, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[17]  M. Sipser,et al.  Monotone Separation of Logspace from NC. , 1991 .

[18]  L. Lovász,et al.  Applications of product colouring , 1974 .

[19]  Pavel Pudlák,et al.  Top-down lower bounds for depth-three circuits , 1995, computational complexity.

[20]  Russell Impagliazzo,et al.  Communication complexity towards lower bounds on circuit depth , 1991, [1991] Proceedings 32nd Annual Symposium of Foundations of Computer Science.

[21]  Or Meir,et al.  Toward better formula lower bounds: an information complexity approach to the KRW composition conjecture , 2014, STOC.