Preservice Elementary Mathematics Teachers’ Emerging Ability to Write Problems to Build on Children’s Mathematics

It has become increasingly important for mathematics teacher educators to assist elementary preservice teachers (PSTs) in leveraging the knowledge of children’s learning of mathematics during instruction. Professional noticing (Jacobs et al. J Res Math Educ 41(2):169–202, 2010) involves the interrelated skills of attending, interpreting, and responding to children’s mathematics. Responding with problems that build on children’s mathematical thinking is a skill that is both difficult to learn and a critical practice in teaching elementary mathematics. We present our analyses of PSTs’ responses to a sequence of three increasingly complex methods course activities designed to scaffold PSTs’ engagement in professional noticing, and to develop their abilities to write problems that build on children’s mathematics. Supported by our series of activities, PSTs demonstrated a strong foundation in attending to and interpreting children’s mathematics. In comparison, however, these experiences did not result in comparable gains in responding to the children’s mathematical thinking, a result with implications for mathematics education.

[1]  Susan B. Empson,et al.  Cognitively Guided Instruction: A Research-Based Teacher Professional Development Program for Elementary School Mathematics. Research Report. , 2000 .

[2]  Thomas P. Carpenter,et al.  Children's Mathematics: Cognitively Guided Instruction , 1999 .

[3]  Margaret S. Smith,et al.  Thinking through a Lesson: Successfully Implementing High-Level Tasks. , 2008 .

[4]  L. Shulman Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[5]  C. Hirsch Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics , 1988 .

[6]  D. Ball,et al.  Unpacking Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Conceptualizing and Measuring Teachers' Topic-Specific Knowledge of Students , 2008, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.

[7]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[8]  Douglas A. Grouws,et al.  Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning , 1992 .

[9]  Pam Grossman,et al.  Teaching Practice: A Cross-Professional Perspective , 2009, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[10]  Robert Streit,et al.  Developments in School Mathematics Education around the World. University of Chicago School Mathematics Project. Volume Three. Proceedings of the UCSMP International Conference on Mathematics Education (3rd, October 30-November 1, 1991). , 1992 .

[11]  Randolph A. Philipp,et al.  Professional Noticing of Children's Mathematical Thinking. , 2010 .

[12]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[13]  Margaret S. Smith,et al.  Mathematical Tasks as a Framework for Reflection: From Research to Practice , 1998 .

[14]  Deborah Loewenberg Ball,et al.  Content Knowledge for Teaching , 2008 .

[15]  Nancy Nesbitt Vacc,et al.  Elementary Preservice Teachers' Changing Beliefs and Instructional Use of Children's Mathematical Thinking , 1999 .

[16]  Hyman Bass,et al.  Knowing Mathematics for Teaching Who Knows Mathematics Well Enough To Teach Third Grade, and How Can We Decide? , 2005 .

[17]  Elizabeth Fennema,et al.  Cognitively guided instruction: Building on the knowledge of students and teachers. , 1992 .

[18]  O. Mcnamara,et al.  Becoming a Mathematics Teacher , 2011 .

[19]  M. Franke,et al.  Teachers' knowledge and its impact. , 1992 .

[20]  T. P. Carpenter,et al.  Chapter 4 Cognitively guided instruction: Building on the knowledge of students and teachers* , 1992 .