In search of a good neuro-genetic computational paradigm

This paper reports the effect of some advanced genetic operators like two-parents multipoint restricted crossover (Double-MRX), three-parents multipoint restricted crossover (Triple-MRX), elitist selection and scheduled mutation on the adaptability of feedforward neural networks trained over complex and computationally expensive electronic nose data. The authors show that the performance of Triple-MRX is better that of Double-MRX. Upon applying elitist selection with Double-MRX and scheduled mutation with Triple-MRX, the performance of the genetic training of the neural network improves up to some extent, but Triple-MRX is still better than Double-MRX as far as quality of solution and speed of convergence are concerned. It is also shown that the performance levels of these hybrid techniques far exceeds those of the commonly used backpropagation model. The search for a good neuro-genetic hybrid computational paradigm based on advanced genetic operators is a frontier research area in the evolution of a sixth generation computing system.

[1]  Günter Rudolph,et al.  Convergence analysis of canonical genetic algorithms , 1994, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[2]  Surya B. Yadav,et al.  The Development and Evaluation of an Improved Genetic Algorithm Based on Migration and Artificial Selection , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[3]  Derek A. Linkens,et al.  Learning systems in intelligent control: an appraisal of fuzzy, neural and genetic algorithm control applications , 1996 .

[4]  Cesare Alippi,et al.  Genetic-algorithm programming environments , 1994, Computer.

[5]  E. Clothiaux,et al.  Neural Networks and Their Applications , 1994 .

[6]  Gerrit Kateman,et al.  Optimization of calibration data with the dynamic genetic algorithm , 1992 .

[7]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[8]  Sam Kwong,et al.  Genetic algorithms: concepts and applications [in engineering design] , 1996, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[9]  Sam Kwong,et al.  Genetic algorithms and their applications , 1996, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[10]  J. D. Schaffer,et al.  Combinations of genetic algorithms and neural networks: a survey of the state of the art , 1992, [Proceedings] COGANN-92: International Workshop on Combinations of Genetic Algorithms and Neural Networks.

[11]  Vittorio Maniezzo,et al.  Genetic evolution of the topology and weight distribution of neural networks , 1994, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[12]  Halbert White,et al.  Learning in Artificial Neural Networks: A Statistical Perspective , 1989, Neural Computation.

[13]  David B. Fogel,et al.  An introduction to simulated evolutionary optimization , 1994, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[14]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Fuzzy connectives based crossover operators to model genetic algorithms population diversity , 1997, Fuzzy Sets Syst..