STUDENTS’ AND INSTRUCTORS’ BELIEFS ABOUT EXCELLENT LECTURERS AND DISCUSSION LEADERS

To what extent do students and teachers hold similar beliefs about excellent teaching? Do differences in beliefs have practical implications (e.g., how students rate their teachers on end-of-semester evaluation forms)? In Study 1, undergraduate students (N=414) and faculty members (N=128) responded to questionnaires assessing their perceptions of an excellent discussion leader, lecturer, or instructor. Participants judged items that contributed to a Structure composite as more characteristic of excellent lecturers than excellent discussion leaders and items that contributed to a Process composite as more characteristic of excellent discussion leaders than excellent lecturers. Results for students and teachers showed several systematic differences. In Study 2,278 students and their course teachers rated the characteristics of a hypothetical excellent lecturer. In addition, students rated the effectiveness of their individual teachers. Students’ ratings of their teachers were higher when students and teachers agreed on their perceptions of characteristics of excellent lecturers.

[1]  D. Broverman,et al.  Sex‐Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal , 1972 .

[2]  V. Benassi,et al.  Preparing Tomorrow's Psychologists for Careers in Academe , 1993 .

[3]  J. C. Smart,et al.  Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research , 2001, Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research.

[4]  J. Baron,et al.  An analysis of the word-superiority effect☆ , 1973 .

[5]  Gary S. Goldstein,et al.  The Relation between Teacher Self-Disclosure and Student Classroom Participation , 1994 .

[6]  M. Knowles.  The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy , 1970 .

[7]  H. Marsh,et al.  Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. , 1997 .

[8]  Joseph Lowman,et al.  Mastering the Techniques of Teaching , 1984 .

[9]  Claude Mathis,et al.  Mastering the Techniques of Teaching by Joseph Lowman. San Francisco , 1984 .

[10]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  Students' Evaluations of Tertiary Instruction: Testing the Applicability of American Surveys in an Australian Setting , 1981 .

[11]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[12]  K. Eble,et al.  The craft of teaching , 1976 .

[13]  J. P. Rushton,et al.  Teacher personality traits and student instructional ratings in six types of university courses , 1990 .

[14]  K. Patricia Cross,et al.  Classroom Assessment Techniques , 1993 .

[15]  Gary S. Goldstein,et al.  Students' Perceptions of Excellent Lecturers and Discussion Leaders. , 1996 .

[16]  Dieter J. Schönwetter,et al.  Content Familiarity: Differential Impact of Effective Teaching on Student Achievement Outcomes , 2002 .

[17]  Sandi W. Smith.  The Prototypical Features of the Outstanding Professor from the Female and Male Undergraduate Perspective: The Roles of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication. , 1994 .

[18]  W. McKeachie.  Teaching tips: A guidebook for the beginning college teacher , 1963 .

[19]  Kenneth A. Feldman,et al.  Effective college teaching from the students' and faculty's view: Matched or mismatched priorities? , 1988 .

[20]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  The Lecture and Discussion Method for Management Education:Pros and Cons , 1989 .