Dynamical Graph Theory Networks Methods for the Analysis of Sparse Functional Connectivity Networks and for Determining Pinning Observability in Brain Networks

Neuroimaging in combination with graph theory has been successful in analyzing the functional connectome. However almost all analysis are performed based on static graph theory. The derived quantitative graph measures can only describe a snap shot of the disease over time. Neurodegenerative disease evolution is poorly understood and treatment strategies are consequently only of limited efficiency. Fusing modern dynamic graph network theory techniques and modeling strategies at different time scales with pinning observability of complex brain networks will lay the foundation for a transformational paradigm in neurodegnerative diseases research regarding disease evolution at the patient level, treatment response evaluation and revealing some central mechanism in a network that drives alterations in these diseases. We model and analyze brain networks as two-time scale sparse dynamic graph networks with hubs (clusters) representing the fast sub-system and the interconnections between hubs the slow sub-system. Alterations in brain function as seen in dementia can be dynamically modeled by determining the clusters in which disturbance inputs have entered and the impact they have on the large-scale dementia dynamic system. Observing a small fraction of specific nodes in dementia networks such that the others can be recovered is accomplished by the novel concept of pinning observability. In addition, how to control this complex network seems to be crucial in understanding the progressive abnormal neural circuits in many neurodegenerative diseases. Detecting the controlling regions in the networks, which serve as key nodes to control the aberrant dynamics of the networks to a desired state and thus influence the progressive abnormal behavior, will have a huge impact in understanding and developing therapeutic solutions and also will provide useful information about the trajectory of the disease. In this paper, we present the theoretical framework and derive the necessary conditions for (1) area aggregation and time-scale modeling in brain networks and for (2) pinning observability of nodes in dynamic graph networks. Simulation examples are given to illustrate the theoretical concepts.

[1]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  Prototypical Components of Honeybee Homing Flight Behavior Depend on the Visual Appearance of Objects Surrounding the Goal , 2012, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[2]  Ludovico Minati,et al.  Connectivity of the amygdala, piriform, and orbitofrontal cortex during olfactory stimulation: a functional MRI study , 2013, Neuroreport.

[3]  Huijun Gao,et al.  A Constrained Evolutionary Computation Method for Detecting Controlling Regions of Cortical Networks , 2012, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

[4]  Joe H. Chow,et al.  Time scale modeling of sparse dynamic networks , 1985 .

[5]  Emrah Biyik,et al.  Area Aggregation and Time Scale Modeling for Sparse Nonlinear Networks , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[6]  J. M. A. Scherpen,et al.  Balancing for nonlinear systems , 1993 .

[7]  D. Hu,et al.  Identifying major depression using whole-brain functional connectivity: a multivariate pattern analysis. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  Tianping Chen,et al.  Pinning Complex Networks by a Single Controller , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[9]  Guanghui Wen,et al.  Pinning observability in complex networks , 2014 .

[10]  Jorge Munilla,et al.  Exploratory graphical models of functional and structural connectivity patterns for Alzheimer's Disease diagnosis , 2015, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[11]  E. Yaz Linear Matrix Inequalities In System And Control Theory , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Controllability of complex networks , 2011, Nature.

[13]  Anke Meyer-Bäse,et al.  Gene regulatory networks simplified by nonlinear balanced truncation , 2008, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[14]  Jinde Cao,et al.  On Pinning Synchronization of Directed and Undirected Complex Dynamical Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[15]  C. Thiel,et al.  Pro-cognitive drug effects modulate functional brain network organization , 2012, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[16]  J. Marsden,et al.  A subspace approach to balanced truncation for model reduction of nonlinear control systems , 2002 .

[17]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Schizophrenia, neuroimaging and connectomics , 2012, NeuroImage.

[18]  Anke Meyer-Bäse,et al.  Dynamical graph theory networks techniques for the analysis of sparse connectivity networks in dementia , 2017, Commercial + Scientific Sensing and Imaging.

[19]  B. Moore Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction , 1981 .