Quantifying the visual quality of wavelet-compressed images based on local contrast, visual masking, and global precedence

The paper presents a two-stage metric which quantifies the visual quality of images that have undergone wavelet-based compression. The first stage operates via a model of visual pattern masking, which takes as input original and distorted images, and which outputs masked contrast detection thresholds. For distortions beyond the threshold of detection, the images and the thresholds are fed into a second stage which estimates visual quality based on the distance between the distribution of assumed ideal and actual contrast signal-to-noise ratios across scale-space. Results indicate that the proposed metric yields a higher correlation with subjective-rating data than other visual quality metrics when applied to a sample of wavelet-coded images (with rates ranging from approximately 0.08-0.85 bits/pixel) for which peak signal-to-noise ratio correlates poorly with subjective quality.

[1]  M. CONCETTA MORRONE,et al.  Noise and recognizability of coarse quantized images (reply) , 1984, Nature.

[2]  Matthew Anderson,et al.  Proposal for a Standard Default Color Space for the Internet - sRGB , 1996, CIC.

[3]  BELA JULESZ,et al.  Noise and recognizability of coarse quantized images , 1984, Nature.

[4]  P. Bex,et al.  Spatial frequency, phase, and the contrast of natural images. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[5]  Andrew P. Bradley,et al.  A wavelet visible difference predictor , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[6]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Image Quality Assessment: From Error Measurement to Structural Similarity , 2004 .

[7]  D. Chandler,et al.  Effects of natural images on the detectability of simple and compound wavelet subband quantization distortions. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  C.-C. Jay Kuo,et al.  Image quality measurement using the Haar wavelet , 1997, Optics & Photonics.

[9]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  J A Solomon,et al.  Model of visual contrast gain control and pattern masking. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[11]  Charles A. Poynton,et al.  Rehabilitation of gamma , 1998, Electronic Imaging.

[12]  D. Field,et al.  Sensitivity to contrast histogram differences in synthetic wavelet-textures , 2001, Vision Research.

[13]  Wenjun Zeng,et al.  An overview of the visual optimization tools in JPEG 2000 , 2002, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[14]  M. G. Ramos,et al.  Suprathreshold wavelet coefficient quantization in complex stimuli: psychophysical evaluation and analysis. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[15]  Velitchko Manahilov,et al.  Energy model for contrast detection: spatial-frequency and orientation selectivity in grating summation , 2001, Vision Research.

[16]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Jyrki Rovamo,et al.  Contrast matching of two-dimensional compound gratings , 1994, Vision Research.

[18]  David S. Taubman,et al.  High performance scalable image compression with EBCOT. , 2000, IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society.

[19]  Scott J. Daly,et al.  Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[20]  Stephen A. Engel,et al.  Linearity across spatial frequency in object recognition , 1998, Vision Research.

[21]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[22]  Benjamin Belzer,et al.  Wavelet filter evaluation for image compression , 1995, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[23]  Sheila S. Hemami,et al.  Suprathreshold image compression based on contrast allocation and global precedence , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[24]  B. Moulden,et al.  The Standard Deviation of Luminance as a Metric for Contrast in Random-Dot Images , 1990, Perception.

[25]  Sheila S. Hemami,et al.  Dynamic contrast-based quantization for lossy wavelet image compression , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[26]  John D. Villasenor,et al.  Visibility of wavelet quantization noise , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[27]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  D. Field,et al.  What's constant in contrast constancy? The effects of scaling on the perceived contrast of bandpass patterns , 1995, Vision Research.