Social learning theory and developmental psychology: The legacies of Robert Sears and Albert Bandura.

Social learning theory began as an attempt by Robert Sears and others to meld psychoanalytic and stimulus-response learning theory into a comprehensive explanation of human behavior, drawing on the clinical richness of the former and the rigor of the latter. Albert Bandura abandoned the psychoanalytic and drive features of the approach, emphasizing instead cognitive and information-processing capacities that mediate social behavior. Both theories were intended as a general framework for the understanding of human behavior, and their developmental aspects remain to be worked out in detail

[1]  A. T. Wray PERSONALITY AND PSYCHOTHERAPY , 1936 .

[2]  R. Sears II. Non-aggressive reactions to frustration. , 1941 .

[3]  John Cohen Frustration and Aggression , 1944, Nature.

[4]  John Cohen Social Learning and Imitation , 1945, Nature.

[5]  N. Miller,et al.  Theory and experiment relating psychoanalytic displacement to stimulus-response generalization. , 1948, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[6]  Neal E. Miller,et al.  Personality and Psychotherapy: An Analysis in Terms of Learning, Thinking, and Culture , 1963 .

[7]  R. Sears A theoretical framework for personality and social behavior. , 1951 .

[8]  J. W. Whiting,et al.  Some child-rearing antecedents of aggression and dependency in young children. , 1953, Genetic psychology monographs.

[9]  A L BALDWIN,et al.  Child psychology. , 1956, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  N. Littner Patterns of Child Rearing. Robert R. Sears , Eleanor E. Maccoby , Harry Levin , 1957 .

[11]  H. Levin,et al.  Patterns of child rearing , 1957 .

[12]  J. Rose Patterns of Child Rearing , 1958 .

[13]  U. Bronfenbrenner Freudian theories of identification and their derivatives. , 1960, Child development.

[14]  A. Bandura,et al.  INFLUENCE OF SOCIAL REINFORCEMENT AND THE BEHAVIOR OF MODELS IN SHAPING CHILDREN'S MORAL JUDGMENTS. , 1963, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[15]  A. Bandura,et al.  Social learning and personality development , 1964 .

[16]  A. Bandura,et al.  A COMPARATIVE TEST OF THE STATUS ENVY, SOCIAL POWER, AND SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT THEORIES OF IDENTIFICATORY LEARNING. , 1963, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[17]  A. Bandura Vicarious Processes: A Case of No-Trial Learning1 , 1965 .

[18]  R. Sears,et al.  Identification and child rearing , 1966 .

[19]  M. Hoffman,et al.  Review of Child Development Research , 1966 .

[20]  W. Hartup,et al.  Age and verbalization in observational learning. , 1969 .

[21]  Goslin,et al.  Handbook of socialization theory and research , 1969 .

[22]  M. Hoffman Conscience, personality, and socialization techniques. , 1970, Human development.

[23]  A. Bandura Aggression: a social learning analysis , 1971 .

[24]  R. Sears Your ancients revisited: A history of child development , 1975 .

[25]  R. Mccall Challenges to a science of developmental psychology. , 1977 .

[26]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[27]  U. Bronfenbrenner Toward an Experimental Ecology of Human Development. , 1977 .

[28]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychology Review.

[29]  A. Bandura,et al.  Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. , 1981 .

[30]  D. R. Shaffer,et al.  Contributions of parents and peers to children's moral socialization , 1982 .

[31]  L. Nucci Evaluating Teachers as Social Agents: Students’ Ratings of Domain Appropriate and Domain Inappropriate Teacher Responses to Transgressions , 1984 .

[32]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[33]  Wilbert J. McKeachie,et al.  THE NEED FOR STUDY STRATEGY TRAINING , 1988 .

[34]  Amartya Sen,et al.  The Concept of Development , 1988 .

[35]  G. Rebok,et al.  Memory self-efficacy and performance differences in young and old adults: The effect of mnemonic training. , 1989 .