Applying structural equation modeling to report psychometric properties of Chinese version 10-item CES-D depression scale

This study investigates the psychometric properties of Chinese-version short-form 10-item CES-D (i.e., CESD-10) in clinical depression patients and non-clinical college students by structural equation modeling approach. Several statistical procedures are applied to investigate the psychometric properties of CESD-10. First, the single factor model of CESD-10 shows merely mediocre fit due to “error term correlations”. The two pairs of error term correlations indicate that CESD-10 has redundant items and negative-worded effect. The revised model, based on the modification index, demonstrates good fit, and is adopted for subsequent analysis. Results of the SEM-based method show that configure invariance holds, while weak factorial invariance is not supported. A comparison the psychometric properties of the two groups shows that the clinical sample has better reliability, while the non-clinical sample has superior factorial validity. This finding confirms that the Chinese-version CESD-10 is most appropriate for the nonclinical, general population, although it is also valid for the clinically depressed.

[1]  Jan de Leeuw,et al.  On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables , 1987 .

[2]  B. Zumbo,et al.  Sample Invariance of the Structural Equation Model and the Item Response Model: A Case Study , 2002 .

[3]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[4]  Timothy R. Hinkin.  A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations , 1995 .

[5]  Sheung-Tak Cheng,et al.  The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in older Chinese: thresholds for long and short forms , 2005, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[6]  L. Berkman,et al.  Two Shorter Forms of the CES-D Depression Symptoms Index , 1993 .

[7]  D L Patrick,et al.  Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale). , 1994, American journal of preventive medicine.

[8]  J. Grzywacz,et al.  Evaluating Short-Form Versions of the CES-D for Measuring Depressive Symptoms Among Immigrants From Mexico , 2006, Hispanic journal of behavioral sciences.

[9]  K. Bollen,et al.  What Are We Measuring? An Evaluation of the CES-D Across Race/Ethnicity and Immigrant Generation , 2005 .

[10]  Sen-Chi Yu,et al.  Comparison of Internet-Based and Paper-Based Questionnaires in Taiwan Using Multisample Invariance Approach , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[11]  L. Radloff.  The CES-D Scale , 1977 .

[12]  B Sachs,et al.  Psychometrics for two short forms of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale. , 1998, Issues in mental health nursing.

[13]  K. Boey.  Cross‐validation of a short form of the CES‐D in Chinese elderly , 1999, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[14]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Item factor analysis: current approaches and future directions. , 2007, Psychological methods.

[15]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .