Head flexion angle while using a smartphone

Repetitive or prolonged head flexion posture while using a smartphone is known as one of risk factors for pain symptoms in the neck. To quantitatively assess the amount and range of head flexion of smartphone users, head forward flexion angle was measured from 18 participants when they were conducing three common smartphone tasks (text messaging, web browsing, video watching) while sitting and standing in a laboratory setting. It was found that participants maintained head flexion of 33–45° (50th percentile angle) from vertical when using the smartphone. The head flexion angle was significantly larger (p < 0.05) for text messaging than for the other tasks, and significantly larger while sitting than while standing. Study results suggest that text messaging, which is one of the most frequently used app categories of smartphone, could be a main contributing factor to the occurrence of neck pain of heavy smartphone users. Practitioner Summary: In this laboratory study, the severity of head flexion of smartphone users was quantitatively evaluated when conducting text messaging, web browsing and video watching while sitting and standing. Study results indicate that text messaging while sitting caused the largest head flexion than that of other task conditions.

[1]  Jack T Dennerlein,et al.  Touch-screen tablet user configurations and case-supported tilt affect head and neck flexion angles. , 2012, Work.

[2]  L Straker,et al.  Effect of visual display height on modelled upper and lower cervical gravitational moment, muscle capacity and relative strain , 2009, Ergonomics.

[3]  J P Psihogios,et al.  A field evaluation of monitor placement effects in VDT users. , 2001, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  T. Lam,et al.  Clinical measurement of craniovertebral angle by electronic head posture instrument: a test of reliability and validity. , 2009, Manual therapy.

[5]  P M Bongers,et al.  Are neck flexion, neck rotation, and sitting at work risk factors for neck pain? Results of a prospective cohort study , 2001, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[6]  B. Amick,et al.  Musculoskeletal symptoms among mobile hand-held device users and their relationship to device use: A preliminary study in a Canadian university population. , 2011, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  L Karlqvist,et al.  Influence of laptop computer design and working position on physical exposure variables. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  J P Psihogios,et al.  The effects of video display terminal height on the operator: a comparison of the 15 degree and 40 degree recommendations. , 1998, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  Satoshi Suzuki,et al.  Changes in Posture of the Upper Extremity Through the Use of Various Sizes of Tablets and Characters , 2013, HCI.

[10]  Kamal Kothiyal,et al.  Effects of computer monitor setting on muscular activity, user comfort and acceptability in office work. , 2009, Work.

[11]  J E Gold,et al.  Characterization of posture and comfort in laptop users in non-desk settings. , 2012, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  Carolyn M. Sommerich,et al.  Effects of Computer Monitor Viewing Angle and Related Factors on Strain, Performance, and Preference Outcomes , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[13]  D. Elliott,et al.  Does head extension and flexion increase postural instability in elderly subjects when visual information is kept constant? , 2005, Gait & posture.

[14]  A. Spaepen,et al.  Posture, muscle activity and muscle fatigue in prolonged VDT work at different screen height settings , 2003, Ergonomics.

[15]  Jennie P. Psihogios,et al.  The effects of video display terminal height on the operator: a comparison of the 15° and 40° recommendations , 1998 .