Vascular pedicle ligation techniques during laparoscopic colectomy

BackgroundA variety of devices are available for pedicle ligation during laparoscopic colectomy including vascular staplers, clips, and electrothermal bipolar vessel-sealing devices. This study assesses their speed, reliability, and cost to guide surgeons in their choice for intracorporeal pedicle ligation.MethodsA prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic vascular staplers and disposable clip appliers (S/C) with the LigaSure Atlas (LIG) was performed during elective right, left, and total colectomy. Cases were stratified by procedure. Failure was defined as any bleeding after proper pedicle ligation.ResultsThe study included 48 S/C patients and 52 LIG patients with no differences in demographics, diagnosis, procedure, number of vessels ligated per procedure, or operative time. Failure occurred for 14 (9.2%) of the 152 vessels ligated in the S/C group, as compared with 5 (3%) of the 169 vessels ligated in the LIG group (p = 0.02). The median blood loss associated with device failure was 50 ml (range, 20–50 ml) in S/C group, as compared with 100 ml (range 25–800 ml) in the LIG group (p = 0.054). Major blood loss attributable to device failure and surgeon error occurred in only one LIG case. The mean cost per case of vessel ligation was significantly less in the LIG group ($317 ± $0 vs $400 ± $112; p < 0.001). The cost differences were greatest for total colectomy (LIG = $317 ± $0 vs S/C = $565 ± $67; p = 0.002).ConclusionDevice failure, although more common in the S/C group, does not result in significant blood loss. The LigaSure Atlas is more cost effective during laparoscopic colectomy, especially total colectomy, and may allow the surgeon more versatility in its application.

[1]  S. Brown,et al.  Surgical stapler-associated fatalities and adverse events reported to the Food and Drug Administration. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[2]  Y. Kuroda,et al.  Comparative study of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomy , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[3]  L. Emery,et al.  Randomized Trial of Suture Versus Electrosurgical Bipolar Vessel Sealing in Vaginal Hysterectomy , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  G. Mostafa,et al.  Effectiveness of the Ultrasonic Coagulating Shears, LigaSure Vessel Sealer, and Surgical Clip Application in Biliary Surgery: A Comparative Analysis , 2001, The American surgeon.

[5]  K. Shirouzu,et al.  Clipless hand-assisted laparoscopic total colectomy using Ligasure Atlas. , 2004, The Kurume medical journal.

[6]  B. Heniford,et al.  A comparison of laparoscopic bipolar vessel sealing devices in the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. , 2003, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[7]  D. Schoetz,et al.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: helping hand or hindrance? , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[8]  P. Marcello Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a helping hand? , 2004, Clinics in colon and rectal surgery.

[9]  M R Moran,et al.  The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. , 1997, Archives of surgery.

[10]  A. Senagore,et al.  Does Conversion of a Laparoscopic Colectomy Adversely Affect Patient Outcome? , 2004, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[11]  J. Murray,et al.  Benefits of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Restorative Proctocolectomy: A Comparative Study , 2004, Diseases of the colon and rectum.